No. Supposedly it takes half an hour or something like that to get good low-light vision, for most people. It takes maybe 2-3 minutes for me. But, I am sensitive to bright lights, can be nearly blinded by LED and SilverStar headlights, and the new cold LED street lights hurt my eyes (all are bluer than late-day sunlight).For the Blue & Blackers...do you have troubles adjusting to darkness quickly? Like when a light turns off, does it take you a while to adjust? That's one thing I'm reading. People that see the white and gold are able to adjust faster in poor lighting. That holds true for my wife and I.
The catch is that those of us who have troubles with lighting are better at interpreting color.
Opinions?
Tho I'm still seeing blue/black in the original pic, this is the first example I've seen that helps me visualize what the white-holders are seeing:
No, the question is "What color is this dress?", not "What colors are the pixels found within the image of this dress?". The question requires a higher level of critical and contextual thinking that goes beyond the average autistic hyper-literal ATOT member. Your interpretation makes as much sense as looking at a bad photo of a white guy, analyzing the pixels to determine those corresponding to his skin are closer to black than white, and saying "See, he's a black guy!" No, you are not correct. You are laughably wrong.
Sorry losers, it's Blue and Black straight from the dress owner.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/26/us/blue-black-white-gold-dress/
Funny thing is the polls online are 3/4 of people said white and gold.
In your example of what colour is the guy in the picture, yeah he's a black guy.
Youre supposed to be looking at the picture not searching out the guy/dress IRL and finding out what race/colour he/it is.
The point is that youre looking at the picture without context and examining that with respect to other peoples experience of the picture.
The interesting thing is that some people are seeing false colours in the picture (black/blue) and some people aren't. More interesting is that some people (we'll call them weirdos for brevity) can change between both.
Go back and read all the posts from the beginning and you'll see everyone saying "I see gold/white" or "I see blue/black". No one mentioned anything about "I see these colors but I think it's really these instead. Nor "I perceive these colors even though the image shows different"
I can see the gold in the black, but I can't see how people are getting white out the blue. Maybe when I go home later today it will change on me!
Where do I fit in? Because I see it as gold and blue.
But in all seriousness, I still find it interesting that people saw (and still see?) white/gold especially when the backgrounds of web pages are much, much closer to white as a reference. I can believe the perception thing with the brain - but I almost can't believe it when a baseline white is present around the image everywhere on the page. The fact it still happens is kind of amazing and does have me wondering just how different each of us may be seeing the world around us. This goes beyond those basic color perception tests that everyone sees wrong consistently.
Been looking at this on and off yesterday and today on my phone and my laptop. I always see gold and white with a slight blue tint. Can't see the black and blue even after looking at the altered pics.
With color sampling, it turns out it really is gold and blue-tinted white. So that is what it actually is (the picture that is, not the actual dress). Those black and blue people must have weak minds that are easily deceived by context. The flip floppers probably have some brain defect. The gold and white people see it as it actually is. We are superior.
With color sampling, it turns out it really is gold and blue-tinted white. So that is what it actually is (the picture that is, not the actual dress). Those black and blue people must have weak minds that are easily deceived by context. The flip floppers probably have some brain defect. The gold and white people see it as it actually is. We are superior.
Been looking at this on and off yesterday and today on my phone and my laptop. I always see gold and white with a slight blue tint. Can't see the black and blue even after looking at the altered pics.
With color sampling, it turns out it really is gold and blue-tinted white. So that is what it actually is (the picture that is, not the actual dress). Those black and blue people must have weak minds that are easily deceived by context. The flip floppers probably have some brain defect. The gold and white people see it as it actually is. We are superior.
RED 98 128
GREEN 149 167
BLUE 200 200 RED 128 124 157
GREEN 128 135 171
BLUE 160 164 223i can't believe people still think this whole thing is about the actual color in the picture. It's all about what your brain perceives!
Can't someone just get the RGB values for these? Wouldn't they be the same regardless of monitor?
I can't believe people still think this whole thing is about the actual color in the picture. It's all about what your brain perceives!
ermergerd ur right!!
I'm so used to undressing women with my eyes, I don't actually see the dress at all.