- Sep 21, 2001
- 18,445
- 127
- 106
Apparently it's being considered in Australia, and I found the comments in this thread to be interesting, very different from the current prevailing view in the US. Or, at least, that's my perception. I just can't see many people in the US stating their intent to discriminate against women in their hiring (even if they did intend it.)
What's your view on paid maternity leave and where do you live?
http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/...-hiring-women/comments-e6frep2f-1225965947487
What's your view on paid maternity leave and where do you live?
http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/...-hiring-women/comments-e6frep2f-1225965947487
yes i would not employ anyone of them if i had a shop.i think it's stupid to employ them now.why do they have to pay for something they want.have a kid and stay home.my mother did and she had 9 so i'am getting sick of woman wanting this and that.
I wont employ women of child-bearing age now it is just too hard. I guess the government is trying to reduce unemployment figures, sort of going backward getting the ladies back in the home.
Pregnancy IS a total inconvenience to small business. Trying to find replacement staff, putting up with women having sickies while they are pregnant and now more paperwork. No way in the world i would employ a woman of child bearing age now