I know it does not work that way,but it SHOULD. That's what I'm saying. Copyright has just gone too far these days and gotten ridiculous. You should be allowed to use other work, as long as you don't try to say it's yours. But now, it's closer to censorship than anything. Unless you make something 100% from scratch you practically can't even upload it... but they're so selective about it, because I see tons of copyrighted stuff on Youtube that does NOT get taken down yet the second I upload even a 2 second clip of something it gets taken down. They should at least be consistent about it, but it's all about money. Of course they're not going to pull down someone's video if it's getting millions of views because YT is making money off it, but someone with <100 views, they'll take it down.
Heck I heard of artists uploading their own content even getting nailed. It's completely absurd. The parody clause also does not exist anymore. Before, you used to be able to use copyrighted work if it's for a parody.
LOL! So if I or you make a popular YouTube video but it only gets popular after someone stole it from your YouTube channel and uploaded it to theirs, it's totally OK as long as they don't claim to have made it?! Bull.
The reason some get pulled instantly is because they are already on file as belonging to someone else who has specified what you and YouTube are allowed to do with it. They aren't policing it for copyrighted stuff, they are policing it for SPECIFIC copyrighted stuff that the owners have asserted copyright to (sometimes inappropriately). It has nothing to do with inconsistency. It's actually pretty consistent.
You can't just rip audio from a Vevo video and use it in your own video and say "but they allowed Vevo to upload it!" Vevo has permission from the copyright owners/record companies. Heck, they practically ARE the record companies. You should expect them to have it flagged. Even if it was original content produced for YouTube by independent content creators it's not OK to just take it. Period.
https://youtu.be/L6A1Lt0kvMA
https://youtu.be/t7tA3NNKF0Q
It's NOT "OK" and, no, it should NOT work that way. Using it for non-commercial purposes shouldn't be criminal and shouldn't have to be removed unless the copyright owner wants it, but that's exactly how the current system is: It doesn't have to be tolerated by the copyright owner but it CAN be and, by default, nothing happens to your video.
There are plenty of wrongfully-asserted copyrights on YouTube, but that's a completely different issue. For example, Ichinisan played Ninja Gaiden live and got slammed by some record company claiming that he used one of their artist's songs just because their artist made a track which sampled the game. They don't own the copyright to it, the developer (Tecmo) does. I would have no issue with Tecmo asserting their copyright but not this record company that thinks it's OK for their artist to use and not OK for us to use. ImPat the NES Punk has been nailed for Ninja Gaiden music in his videos too.
Remember: this is an ENTIRELY different issue and not what you were unjustifiably complaining about. Don't want your videos pulled? Make your own content or host the copyrighted content yourself (exposes you to liability and limits your audience). Them's the ropes. Deal with it.