What graphics card to buy for replacement?

[erik8ant]

For Overwatch at 720p yea, you are fine. Just a question, you say you've had the 670 for 3 years and it's dying. There's a 3yr warranty on that card. I assume you've checked to make sure you are outside of the warranty period? My next questions and sorry if I have missed it is are you buying in the US? It's very rare that you'd find a 1060 3gb for less than a 470, usually they are $30-$50 higher and 470/1050 ti are usually close in price ($10-$20 when 470 is on sale). Honestly I'd still recommend the xfx 480 that has been recommended several times here. It's a solid card that should serve you well seeing how you keep your cards for several years. I'd buy the xfx 480 and then start saving for a new 1080p freesync monitor to replace your 720p.

It's outside of the warranty period. No I'm not buying in the US. I can't buy RX 480 because it's out of my budget. I use 720p for desktop resolution because it looks good for my eyes. Do I really need to change my monitor? Isn't S22B350 display 1080p too?

 

[erik8ant]

Also just choose the best 470 I don't know what it is, but this forum should have some 470 experts.

Does RX 470 consume more power and generate more heat than GTX 1050 Ti?

 

[Bacon1]

You missed my edit...........

Edit:
I just saw this 8gb rx480 offer on Newegg. 13 hours left.!
XFX 8gb rx480 for $210 AR and a free copy of Civ 6.
I'd sell the game for $20 and walk away with a rx480 8gb for under $190.
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod...50774&cm_re=rx_480_8gb-_-14-150-774-_-Product

His budget is $230, why buy the slower 470 with less Vram? Spend the extra $40.

No I saw that, but I was saying the 470 is a much better bang/buck. Its $140 + game vs $210 + game or $70 (50% more money) for 15% performance gain. If he just saved that money he could rebuy a new card in half the time.

However he just said he isn't US based so it doesn't matter.

 

[Bacon1]

Does RX 470 consume more power and generate more heat than GTX 1050 Ti?

Yes, but it's also over 33% faster, so completely different performance tiers.

 

[tential]

Does RX 470 consume more power and generate more heat than GTX 1050 Ti?

Yes, but any gpu would. Getting the lowest end gpu just for "low power" isn't really the best idea for a long term gpu.

Unless you purely plan on playing overwatch, and mobas and relatively low settings which I suspect. In that case go ahead.

 

[happy medium]

Do I really need to change my monitor? Isn't S22B350 display 1080p too?

yes it is

 

[erik8ant]

Yes, but it's also over 33% faster, so completely different performance tiers.

Do I need to have a good cooling solution since RX 470 generate more heat? My case is CM K280 and I have 1 rear fan, Intel stock cooler for i5-3470. For power supply, can S12II-620W run it?

 

[Bacon1]

Do I need to have a good cooling solution since RX 470 generate more heat? My case is CM K280 and I have 1 rear fan, Intel stock cooler for i5-3470. For power supply, can S12II-620W run it?

Regardless of what card you get you should get a 120mm front fan. They are usually under $10. Just make sure to buy one that has good reviews for being quiet. Yes that Seasonic should have no issues at all running it

 

[erik8ant]

I play esports titles mostly and I want to reduce my budget. Which one to buy? RX 460 2GB or GTX 1050? 75Hz Freesync or 144Hz Gsync monitor?

 

[Madpacket]

I think we're getting trolled now. No offense erik8ant but you've been generously provided enough guidance from the forum members here WRT which card to buy. I recommend starting a new thread instead of continually changing the goal posts.

 

[littleg]

He already has a 1080 monitor, he's just running it at 720.

 

[Creig]

I'd say the 8GB 1330 MHz PowerColor Red Devil RX480 for $200 AR is an excellent deal. Certainly better than any 1060 you can find while being just as fast. And it has more VRAM than any 1060. I have that exact same card in my computer and I'm totally satisfied with it. Triple fan cooler is nice and quiet. Just be sure your case has enough room to fit it.

https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?item=N82E16814131694

 

[crisium]

I play esports titles mostly and I want to reduce my budget. Which one to buy? RX 460 2GB or GTX 1050? 75Hz Freesync or 144Hz Gsync monitor?

Just in case you are serious, let me set you straight. Those cards are slower than the GTX 670 in many games.

As madpacket said, there is plenty of info here already. Reread the thread. Buy the best card you can afford in this order:
RX 480 8GB / GTX 1060 6GB (either one)
RX 480 4GB
RX 470 4GB / GTX 1060 3GB (either one though I personally would go 470 4GB)

A RX 470 uses less power / watts than a GTX 670. Forget any power concerns. And a 1050 Ti is too small of an upgrade from a 670, in my opinion.

If you want to buy a monitor and card with the same budget then you simply cannot improve performance, and will have to go monitor only. Just 1080p your current one if you want a new GPU. One or the other - not both with your budget. And I'd recommend starting another thread if you want the monitor.

 

[Bacon1]

75Hz Freesync or 144Hz Gsync monitor?

Agreed with the others but just wanted to point out that these are basically complete opposites. You can find tons of 60-144hz Freesync monitors, and a 144hz GSync will cost you at least $400-500 depending on your country.

 

[erik8ant]

Sorry I'm not a tech savvy guy. Ok I change my graphics card instead of monitor due to limited budget. If I don't change my monitor then I just have to bear with screen tearing with Vsync off when playing Overwatch and other first person shooter games for higher FPS. So RX 470 4GB is the way to go? MSI or Gigabyte?

 

[Bacon1]

Sorry I'm not a tech savvy guy. Ok I change my graphics card instead of monitor due to limited budget. If I don't change my monitor then I just have to bear with screen tearing with Vsync off when playing Overwatch and other first person shooter games for higher FPS. So RX 470 4GB is the way to go? MSI or Gigabyte?

For games like CS:GO or Overwatch, having max FPS is a must over screen tearing, as the higher FPS the faster the simulation time. But yes if you want to get rid of screen tearing you can get a 144hz freesync monitor to go with a 470. Whichever is cheaper quality wise they are very similar.

 

[erik8ant]

I'm stuck in choosing between GTX 1050 Ti and RX 470 4GB. If I want to save electricity bill, isn't GTX 1050 Ti a better choice since Nvidia GPU consume less power than AMD GPU therefore less heat and less noise right?

 

[crisium]

You will be saving on the electricity bill. The RX 470 uses less than your GTX 670.

 

[raghu78]

I'm stuck in choosing between GTX 1050 Ti and RX 470 4GB. If I want to save electricity bill, isn't GTX 1050 Ti a better choice since Nvidia GPU consume less power than AMD GPU therefore less heat and less noise right?

There is no dilemma . Power savings are not going to be huge even if you plan on gaming 2-3 hours a day. Performance wise Rx 470 is in a different league altogether when compared with GTX 1050 Ti. 50 - 60% faster than GTX 1050 Ti .

http://gamegpu.com/test-video-cards/opredelenie-naibolee-bystrykh-i-optimalnykh-reshenij-2016-goda

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Jml0uItdnE

The Rx 470 is a gem at sub USD 150 prices including rebates. faster than GTX 970 at less than half the GTX 970 launch price. This is the generational leap which a GPU should bring. MSI Rx 470 Armor for USD 160 (USD 130 after rebates).

https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814137076

 

[crisium]

I don’t think they are that far apart on average if you include many other games, but you’re right that they are not comparable cards in performance. The 470 is clearly faster by a significant and noticeable amount. If you can afford both, which you obviously can, and if your current PSU can handle it, which it obviously can (670) then there is no need to consider the 1050 Ti unless you are heavily tethered to some Nvidia eco system thing, which does not seem to be the case.

 

[AtenRa]

+1 for the 470, at sub $150 its the better choice.

 

[Creig]

Unless you're mining 24/7, electricity costs will ALWAYS be a negligible difference between video cards.

 

[IEC]

Unless you're mining 24/7, electricity costs will ALWAYS be a negligible difference between video cards.

And even if you were mining 24/7, the RX470 would still be the better choice because AMD cards have the best perf/W for most mining applications.

RX 470 is better in every respect versus his current GTX 670. He will get much better FPS while still using less electricity than he is now. And unlike the GTX 1050 Ti, the RX 470 is actually a significant upgrade over his GTX 670.

 

[Creig]

Oh, I agree. I was just mentioning that using electricity costs as a reason to get one card over another is usually a moot point. It's such a small difference for the time that you're actually gaming that it's worthless to consider.

 

[Headfoot]

Power differences will account for $1-5 a year. Negligible. It's a waste of time to even talk about it.