What if?

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
59,258
13,875
136
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: JS80
What if Obama wasn't a socialist?

what if you knew what socialism was?

What if you did?

Obama IS a socialist. He has been, and still is in favor of forced redistribution of wealth.

a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.

Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.

Who owns GM? Government. Check.
Who controls GM? Government. CEO fired, Barney Frank decides not to close his district's plant. Check.
Who owns majority of Citi? Government. Check.
Who owns stake in B of A? Government. Check.

So that covers means of production (GM - cars), and capital (banks).

Pleaze do explain, what iz socializm?

Shouldn't we be in P&N if we're going to fling this kind of feces about?
Was it socialism when Bush did it?
 

Danwar

Senior member
May 30, 2008
240
1
71
If the persecution & killings of the jews and other minorities had not happened in WWII the world would be quite different today imo.

No holocaust = Israel would most likely not even exist and therefore terrorism from muslim radicals towards the west would probably not even had existed either.
 

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
59,258
13,875
136
Originally posted by: Captain Howdy
Also, what if no one would have taken JS80's bait? Besides this thread only having one page...

I would have had to find something else to do with that time.
 

PieIsAwesome

Diamond Member
Feb 11, 2007
4,054
1
0
If Hitler had just stuck with uniting all the Germans under Germany and righting the wrongs of the treaty of Versailles he would have been glorious hero of fatherland.

But no, he had to go on with enslaving and genocide and all that noise.

EDIT: Har-har@ thread becoming about Bush and Obama.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: JS80
What if Obama wasn't a socialist?

what if you knew what socialism was?

What if you did?

Obama IS a socialist. He has been, and still is in favor of forced redistribution of wealth.

a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.

Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.

Who owns GM? Government. Check.
Who controls GM? Government. CEO fired, Barney Frank decides not to close his district's plant. Check.
Who owns majority of Citi? Government. Check.
Who owns stake in B of A? Government. Check.

So that covers means of production (GM - cars), and capital (banks).

Pleaze do explain, what iz socializm?

Shouldn't we be in P&N if we're going to fling this kind of feces about?
Was it socialism when Bush did it?

When Bush did what?
 

Paddington

Senior member
Jun 26, 2006
538
0
0
I'm no expert on the matter, but my impression is that the Germans from around then were profoundly anti-semetic and xenophobic. Bashing non-Germans, and promoting the Aryan superman and all that other stuff is how Hitler united all the ethnic Germans and got powerful in the first place. So I don't think Hitler would have gained power in the first place if he was just your regular run of the mill strong-man like Mussolini without all the wild racial superiority trappings.
 

BeauJangles

Lifer
Aug 26, 2001
13,941
1
0
Originally posted by: Paddington
I'm no expert on the matter, but my impression is that the Germans from around then were profoundly anti-semetic and xenophobic. Bashing non-Germans, and promoting the Aryan superman and all that other stuff is how Hitler united all the ethnic Germans and got powerful in the first place. So I don't think Hitler would have gained power in the first place if he was just your regular run of the mill strong-man like Mussolini without all the wild racial superiority trappings.

Not really. Most Germans were not fans of Hitler's racist ideology. Hitler would adjust the racism in his speeches depending on what crowd he was speaking to. As he gained power a prestige in the country, however, he was able to compellingly link the Jews to the surrender in 1918 and increasingly blame them for Germany's defeat. Eventually, that mantra penetrated a lot of society, but I still wouldn't call most Germans gung-go or pro-holocaust.

Plus, Hitler's racism really had little to do with his appointment as Chancellor. Hitler was made Chancellor by powerful men who were not fans of the Weimar Republic. For the most part, they didn't believe whatever Hitler chose to spout, they picked him to be Chancellor because the Nazi party was big (>30% of the vote at the time, though declining) and because they believed they could control him and rule Germany via proxy.
 

natto fire

Diamond Member
Jan 4, 2000
7,117
10
76
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: Captain Howdy
Also, what if no one would have taken JS80's bait? Besides this thread only having one page...

I would have had to find something else to do with that time.

That reminds me it has been a while since I have been to TFNN...
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Amused
Hey guys!

We disagree on a great many things...

But...

Can we all agree that Kate Gosselin is a wise and beautiful woman?


You know what I find funny about the Kunt Gosselin story? Ultimately ended in no more show, but with divorce. If you had to point the finger it's all her fault. Jon wanted no show, but family. Now Kate has no show, broken family. Congrats you selfish biatch.

yeap thats what was thinking. she wanted a show so bad well she got it..now what though?

 

MovingTarget

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2003
9,002
115
106
Hitler keels over in 1939, he goes down as one of the greatest statesmen that ever lived, but with a few scary 'what-if' asterisks. Oh, and I hope you like Marx. Ever played Red Alert?
 

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Originally posted by: RoloMather
What if Hitler and the Nazi didn't do the Holocaust? Let imagine Hitler to be a nice guy who wanted the best for his country. Imagine the Nazi did everything that they did in WW2 like try to take over Europe but instead of the killing of Jews and other races they didn't do any of that.

How would history judge Hitler and the Nazi?

Godwin's law.

/thread

ZV

Godwin's law can't apply to a thread specifically about Hitler/Nazi's, can it?
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
what's really sad about Hitler is I have heard a few times if he did the same thing as he did to the Jews to 'A-RABS' no one would have cared and perhaps even honored him.

I don't buy that though.
 

Candymancan21

Senior member
Jun 8, 2009
278
3
81
If hitler didnt kill jews and instead considered them normal people, the United states i doubt would have ever been able to make the Atomic bomb because remember Einstein and the other Jews/Germans were helpfull in making Rockets and the bomb, the war in the pacific would have gone on forever, and Germany would have probably been the first to develop the bomb instead. I also think the Germans would have had alot more man power in there army if they let Jews join possibly turning the war around in the east and west.

I also like someone said dont think Israel would even exist and terrorism today wouldnt be at the level its at now.
 

natto fire

Diamond Member
Jan 4, 2000
7,117
10
76
LOL, a P&N debate and then a distraction celebrity story to try to take the heat off. Classic mass media strategy. Granted this BS P&N thread will continue to exist, it is really too bad the leniency OT mods give for you trifling ass P&N whiners. Literally, if any of us actually cared about your bullshit we would actually post in P&N. or have more than 2 posts per day, etc...
 

cheesehead

Lifer
Aug 11, 2000
10,079
0
0
Originally posted by: RoloMather
What if Hitler and the Nazi didn't do the Holocaust? Let imagine Hitler to be a nice guy who wanted the best for his country. Imagine the Nazi did everything that they did in WW2 like try to take over Europe but instead of the killing of Jews and other races they didn't do any of that.

How would history judge Hitler and the Nazi?

Badly.

They were royal bastards even without the wholesale slaughter of anyone who wasn't exactly like them.

American history education fail.....as usual.

That said....he most asssuredly would have won. The sheer expense of killing millions upon millions of Jews, homosexuals, Communists, and anyone else he didn't particularly like is the only reason we're not calling the U.K. New Hitlerland.
 

Matthiasa

Diamond Member
May 4, 2009
5,755
23
81
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: JS80
What if Obama wasn't a socialist?

what if you knew what socialism was?

What if you did?

Obama IS a socialist. He has been, and still is in favor of forced redistribution of wealth.

Only thing is that is not what socialism is... so try again?
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Originally posted by: Matthiasa
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: JS80
What if Obama wasn't a socialist?

what if you knew what socialism was?

What if you did?

Obama IS a socialist. He has been, and still is in favor of forced redistribution of wealth.

Only thing is that is not what socialism is... so try again?

Who owns GM? Government. Check.
Who controls GM? Government. CEO fired, Barney Frank decides not to close his district's plant. Check.
Who owns majority of Citi? Government. Check.
Who owns stake in B of A? Government. Check.

So that covers means of production (GM - cars), and capital (banks).

Pleaze do explain, what iz socializm?
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
56,554
16,394
146
Originally posted by: Matthiasa
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: JS80
What if Obama wasn't a socialist?

what if you knew what socialism was?

What if you did?

Obama IS a socialist. He has been, and still is in favor of forced redistribution of wealth.

Only thing is that is not what socialism is... so try again?

Redistribution of wealth is most certainly a form of, and part of socialism.

Come on, you're like Clinton saying head wasn't sex.
 

Matthiasa

Diamond Member
May 4, 2009
5,755
23
81
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Matthiasa
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: JS80
What if Obama wasn't a socialist?

what if you knew what socialism was?

What if you did?

Obama IS a socialist. He has been, and still is in favor of forced redistribution of wealth.

Only thing is that is not what socialism is... so try again?

Who owns GM? Government. Check.
Who controls GM? Government. CEO fired, Barney Frank decides not to close his district's plant. Check.
Who owns majority of Citi? Government. Check.
Who owns stake in B of A? Government. Check.

So that covers means of production (GM - cars), and capital (banks).

Pleaze do explain, what iz socializm?

He said socialism was the forced redistribution of wealth, which it is not.
I know the government is shifting to a more socialist stance in how to run the economy, with what its been doing, but that was not what I was commenting about.

Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: Matthiasa
snip

Redistribution of wealth is most certainly a form of, and part of socialism.

Come on, you're like Clinton saying head wasn't sex.
Forced redistribution of wealth has nothing to do with socialism and everything to do with authoritarianism.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |