Your "answer" to the middle question is a non-answer. You can't answer yes or no because use of the word should is invalid? You think that's an answer to anything? As others have pointed out repeatedly, that is psychobabble.
You also missed question 2: The problem is not with the abuser? None of the questions were answered originally, 2 remain unanswered, and the answer to question one is useless. So what if the rage is chemically produced within me? It's probably a natural survival instinct on the subconscious level, and though you may believe it is poison that's just like, your opinion man.
If you want to take away my bitterness a good place to start would be to stop pretending it's difficult to figure out when professional liars are lying.
Prove to me that professional liars can lie and be believed. The largest so called test of the effectiveness of Ivermectin was a fabrication that lasted 7 months before being exposed:
The preprint endorsing ivermectin as a coronavirus therapy has been widely cited, but independent researchers find glaring discrepancies in the data
www.theguardian.com
"
Meyerowitz-Katz told the Guardian that “this is one of the biggest ivermectin studies out there”, and it appeared to him the data was “just totally faked”. This was concerning because
two meta-analyses of
ivermectin for treating Covid-19 had included the Elgazzar study in the results. A meta-analysis is a statistical analysis that combines the results of multiple scientific studies to determine what the overall scientific literature has found about a treatment or intervention.
“Because the Elgazzar study is so large, and so massively positive – showing a 90% reduction in mortality – it hugely skews the evidence in favour of ivermectin,” Meyerowitz-Katz said.
You are telling me it is easy to detect:
Lawrence said what started out as a simple university assignment had led to a comprehensive investigation into an apparent scientific fraud at a time when “there is a whole ivermectin hype … dominated by a mix of right-wing figures, anti-vaxxers and outright conspiracists”.
“Although science trends towards self-correction, something is clearly broken in a system that can allow a study as full of problems as the Elgazzar paper to run unchallenged for seven months,” he said.
“Thousands of highly educated scientists, doctors, pharmacists, and at least four major medicines regulators missed a fraud so apparent that it might as well have come with a flashing neon sign. That this all happened amid an ongoing global health crisis of epic proportions is all the more terrifying.”
My Dear dank, what you have insisted on throughout this thread is an egotistical arrogance that your finely tuned bullshit meter has all along known that the Ivermectin thingi was a fraud and a joke and that any who fell for it were fools. That makes you the fool. I was also fooled but instead of denying it to the point of absurdity, as you have, I was reminded again just how herd mentality, your own personal herd mentality, can blind you to the truth.
Yes or no, should you stopped beating people to death with your arrogance?