What is the best processor, athon xp, p4?

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

CrazySaint

Platinum Member
May 3, 2002
2,441
0
0
Originally posted by: CrawlingEye
Originally posted by: SaintGeorge
The XP2200+ outperforms a 2.26b in a lot of

Lets see your SiSandra benchies, I'll show mine at default speeds.

HAHAHAHA LOL That's a good one! *regains composure* Ok, and since when do SiSandra scores mean squat? Everybody knows that SiSandra is a synthetic benchmark and has approx. nothing to do with real world performance. I've seen systems that clobbered the competition in SiSandra and got their butt smacked in real world performance.
 

HelzBelz

Member
Jul 31, 2002
53
0
0
Originally posted by: Rainsford ... The truth is that I think both are good and I will buy an Intel processor again when they get one thing right. In my price range, AMD offers much better value than Intel. For what I spend I get a faster processor. Why in the world would I care about the high end when I can't afford it? Sure, Intel has the fastest CPU out right now, but that's doesn't help me any when I don't want to spend that much on a CPU. My Athlon XP 1800 was $100 retail. Please point me to a competing Intel solution in my price range that's better. Oh wait, it doesn't exist. If I wasn't a poor college student I might support Intel more, but I don't have tons of money to spend on computers, and in my price range AMD beats Intel hands down. The day I can buy an Intel CPU in my price range that is both cheaper and faster than the competing AMD chip is the day I start buying Intel again.
Rainsford : Well written, I can't agree more.

So, if I read you right, "Price vs the Performance you need" is what this whole question of "which processor is better" comes down to.

I've purchased both AMD and Intel solutions over the last few years: sometimes Intel got my money, sometimes AMD did...

To complement your idea : since both platforms do accept the same peripherals, and that motherboards* can be found with SAME features, for EITHER processors, at the same price, then the only variable left here is the price of the processor ! Isn't it ? Again, not that simple...

* : not counting the RDRAM option for the P4 since the XP doesn't have an equivalent Rambus solution today... another story, a different thread, but read on...

Anyhow, we should be talking about the price of a complete system (not just the processor), and be comparing "same price" systems to each other.

Fastest processor available TODAY (between an Athlon XP or a Pentium 4) : Intel Pentium 4 ! (easy)

Fastest processor available for your budget : here's where the line cannot easily be drawn...


SSXeon : Yes, you have a great system (for your own reasons and requirements) !

But then so does my mother, with a Celery 900 and integrated everything; for what she needs : browsing and e-mail ! (I guess she's an Intel fan just like you...).

And you did pay a whole lot more money than the vast majority of computer owners... Some people probably need the highest framerates and "benchmark" scores; some would rather pay substantially less, still get a darn fast system, and save the cash for whatever else they find more important... We sure can't be the judge on any requirements but our own.


Getting back to the subject of this thread (... remember ? ... helping out budgieboo selecting a processor !! ...)

Originally posted by: budgieboo ... that is very tempting since it is about half what i am expecting to pay for the small form factor shuttle. The enlight looks like a good case, but I really do like the smaller case size though.
Do you really need to build a new system from scratch ? Replacing the processor of your existing system and adding RAM could be impressive enough for now, and give you time to research your next big purchase... You will need (most likely) new RAM sticks for a P4 or Athlon XP system, but not if you upgrade the processor in your current system...

Make sure to verify the compatibility of your current motherboard with the faster Intel processors : not many socket 370 motherboards will recognize the "Tualatin" Celerons and P3s; you would then be limited to the "Coppermine" versions (up to 1 GHz)... Good enough for you ?

On the other end, if you drop your old system completely : do you intend to keep some of your previous hardware to drop into the new box ? And, is the physical size of your system so important to you that you would pay extra for the smallest there is ? How much upgrading (RAM, video card, more peripherals to fit in your case, etc.) do you expect to latter do with your future system ?

The Shuttle barebones might or might no be expandable to your likings... not much room in there (if you ever need it). Also, a micro-ATX case is not that much larger than the Shuttle SFF...

Sooo many factors to consider, budgieboo !

Tell us a little more, we'll might be able to help you circle the question even better...


 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: HelzBelz

...

Well said, and welcome to the forums! And your advise is right on, there are many factors to consider, it's really a matter of what you want to spend among other things.
 

alexruiz

Platinum Member
Sep 21, 2001
2,836
556
126
Duvie, I am talking STOCK speeds for the systems (no Oc in CPU or memory).....
 

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
Ok....Well what about with sis chipsets where one is able to run 400mhz ddr at stock 100fsb or 333mmhz at stock fsb....That can't really be considering ocing if the ram is rated for those speeds.

I agree fsb boosting will enhance system so oc'd systems are not always fair comparison....However that is what I compare myself to....If I can buy something for a lot less and oc it and have it be totally stable to the point one could not tell it wasn't the default system...I like to see what I got and how much less did I pay to get it....


Stock AMD chips....hands down the best bang for the buck, period.....If the northwoods did not oc so madly they would still have the best bang for the buck in oc'd systems as well....When intel drops prices madly at the end of the month it will be closer but still amd will likely be the best bang for the buck.
 

CrawlingEye

Senior member
May 28, 2002
262
0
0
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: CrawlingEye
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: alexruiz
I have some question about the heat disipation. The athlon runs much hotter (nobody is going to disagree) but the electrical power consumption is about the same!!! (check the docs)

If the total electrical power consumptions is almost the same, the heat produced should be the same (W=VI, W=I^2R, W=V^2/R....). It think obviously the P4 is more effient taking the heat out. Why or how??? Formulas welcome.

Alex

Doesn't the P4 have a larger core than the AXP? I mean not counting the heatspreader (which I don't think matters a lot), isn't the real core on the P4 larger?

No, the problem is that the AXP's .13u has decreased the size, making the 1w/1m dissipation rate even slower. That's why Tbred's don't OC worth a damn.

Heh, don't be so quick to disagree with me. That's what I said. The P4 has a larger core size, so it's better at getting rid of heat. At least that's my understanding.

You're misunderstanding. The P4 has a heatspreader giving it just the same-sized contact area, that's where part of it's main "cooling" advantages lies. The AXP has decreased as well, but without a heatspreader.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: CrawlingEye
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: CrawlingEye
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: alexruiz
I have some question about the heat disipation. The athlon runs much hotter (nobody is going to disagree) but the electrical power consumption is about the same!!! (check the docs)

If the total electrical power consumptions is almost the same, the heat produced should be the same (W=VI, W=I^2R, W=V^2/R....). It think obviously the P4 is more effient taking the heat out. Why or how??? Formulas welcome.

Alex

Doesn't the P4 have a larger core than the AXP? I mean not counting the heatspreader (which I don't think matters a lot), isn't the real core on the P4 larger?

No, the problem is that the AXP's .13u has decreased the size, making the 1w/1m dissipation rate even slower. That's why Tbred's don't OC worth a damn.

Heh, don't be so quick to disagree with me. That's what I said. The P4 has a larger core size, so it's better at getting rid of heat. At least that's my understanding.

You're misunderstanding. The P4 has a heatspreader giving it just the same-sized contact area, that's where part of it's main "cooling" advantages lies. The AXP has decreased as well, but without a heatspreader.

Well I guess that all depends on how effective you think a heatspreader is. But even without the heatspreader, wouldn't the P4 run cooler partially because it has a larger core size?
 

CrazySaint

Platinum Member
May 3, 2002
2,441
0
0
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: CrawlingEye
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: CrawlingEye
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: alexruiz
I have some question about the heat disipation. The athlon runs much hotter (nobody is going to disagree) but the electrical power consumption is about the same!!! (check the docs)

If the total electrical power consumptions is almost the same, the heat produced should be the same (W=VI, W=I^2R, W=V^2/R....). It think obviously the P4 is more effient taking the heat out. Why or how??? Formulas welcome.

Alex

Doesn't the P4 have a larger core than the AXP? I mean not counting the heatspreader (which I don't think matters a lot), isn't the real core on the P4 larger?

No, the problem is that the AXP's .13u has decreased the size, making the 1w/1m dissipation rate even slower. That's why Tbred's don't OC worth a damn.

Heh, don't be so quick to disagree with me. That's what I said. The P4 has a larger core size, so it's better at getting rid of heat. At least that's my understanding.

You're misunderstanding. The P4 has a heatspreader giving it just the same-sized contact area, that's where part of it's main "cooling" advantages lies. The AXP has decreased as well, but without a heatspreader.

Well I guess that all depends on how effective you think a heatspreader is. But even without the heatspreader, wouldn't the P4 run cooler partially because it has a larger core size?

OMG!! Five (well, now six ) levels of quoting! THUGSROOK would be doubled over laughing by now! Speaking of which, where has the Overlord of the Overclock been keeping himself lately? I haven't seen him in a long while.
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
29,484
24,219
146
Great! another Bruce Lee vs Coke vs Nvidia vs Intel vs ? thread
Congrats to those who addressed the original poster's question and pointed out that both companies make great processors that have their respective strengths As for the rest of this camp A Less filling! camp B taste great! garbage................STFU and join the Carnival as a psychic if you want to look in your crystal ball to predict what the future will hold for each Companies CPUs
 

Nyquest007

Member
Sep 17, 2001
124
0
0
Okay, that said I have a question. I'm looking to buy a new set-up myself. SHould I go with the xp2200+ or Overclock the mess out of a 1.8a pIV? I'm only wondering about performance, the price difference doesn't bother me. And with the pIV, should I go for the 1066 rdram or stick with 400ddr for overclocking? I'm not sure how well rdram OC's.
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
29,484
24,219
146
Originally posted by: Nyquest007
Okay, that said I have a question. I'm looking to buy a new set-up myself. SHould I go with the xp2200+ or Overclock the mess out of a 1.8a pIV? I'm only wondering about performance, the price difference doesn't bother me. And with the pIV, should I go for the 1066 rdram or stick with 400ddr for overclocking? I'm not sure how well rdram OC's.
your question is a "6 of these a half dozen of those" variety IMO. Either setup will give great performance and the RDRAM vs DDR is another raging debate with no clear winner that is going on around here I would personally suggest getting either the 1.8A and DDR or a 1600+(AGOIA or AROIA stepping) and 8K3A+ with DDR. EDIT: I suggest the 1600+ because the 2200+ has very little headroom and myself and many others are getting 2100-2200+ speeds with 166 and higher FSB speeds out of the 1600+/8K3A combo. I also think the 1.8A is a fine value given the yields on the recent batches as well.
 

Nyquest007

Member
Sep 17, 2001
124
0
0
This may sound like a dumb question DAPUNISHER, but which of your systems would you recomend to a gamer and web surfer? I'm running a kt333 board with a 1800+ chip with 768mb of 2100 crucial and a Geforce4 4400. I've been wanting to go P4a for a while and with the P4bs out now, the price has come down some. And I'm researching to see how the P4a are incredible Overclockers. I just want more FPS with out breaking the bank wide open. I'm just so curious to build a P4 machine. I've built countless Amd boxes over the last few years. Just want to see if all the hype is for real
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
29,484
24,219
146
Well, as long as your playing at high enough resolutions to keep the games from being largely CPU limited you could just buy the ATI R300 here soon and seriously impact your frame rates im most games, also you could juice that 1800+ and 2100DDR for some more bandwidth and mhz most likely as well. If you really want to build a P4 box though just grab a 1.8A and 1 of the boards Thugsrook and the gang are blowin' up on and have it Really, the P4s aren't much different than the AMDs to build (easier IMO) but like you I hadn't built one in forever and had to "see for myself" BTW, I'm not disappointed at all with my Intel box and actually made a profit of 50$ selling the 1500+XP box I had at the time after paying for what I needed to finish the P4
 

SeePeeYou

Junior Member
Jul 14, 2002
3
0
0
I'm quite certain I could find benchmarks where a 2100+ beats a 2.53GHz P4.

Where from? And would it be a benchmark that's been run for 3 days non stop? Becuase benchmarks which run non stop are pointless.
 

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
I think of an argument for ddr...dual channel ddr will be out in a few months...getting ddr now will be ready to fly in those boards...dual pc2100 runs at rdram 1066 speeds...imagine pc2700 or pc3200 dual channel??? It will be the best shortly...

Intel is no longer designing for the rdram and thus it will be up to sis and via's of the world...
 

HelzBelz

Member
Jul 31, 2002
53
0
0
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: HelzBelz

...

Well said, and welcome to the forums! And your advise is right on, there are many factors to consider, it's really a matter of what you want to spend among other things.
You're welcome, Rainsford !

Let's just hope that other threads won't degrade into pointless wars (unfortunately, from very few individuals, not to name'em), for the sake of AT Forums' integrity !

Again, getting back to the purpose of this thread :

budgieboo : Have you decided yet ? We're still waiting for your input (see my previous post)... There are so many questions to consider in your particular situation !

 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |