The feminists can spin it however they want, but the stats don't lie. Marriage rates are down. Birth rates are down. And while the actual feminists might not care about that (but most actually do,) the vast majority of women do. And they've been left out in the cold by the second and third order effects of their radical sisters.
As the article points out, males of most species will do the bare minimum to get laid (take a look at male lions, walruses, etc.) When you break the basic biological hierarchy, via changing gender roles, birth control, etc. you get a lot of negative results. Why would I get married when I can have a different Tinder date that's dtf every day of the week? And if I don't feel like doing that, I can hang out with my other single guy friends in their late 20s and 30s, who all make good money, and we can do guy stuff.
You can call me Peter Pan and a "perpetual adolescent" all you want, but as long as I can still hook up with a couple 21 year olds per week, drive a Porsche, buy as big of a TV & speakers as I want, and generally do whatever I want, you're not going to make me feel bad about it. As the article says, women used to exchange sex for commitment. Now they exchange sex for nothing, and wonder why there's no commitment to be had. I've seen at least 10 Tinder profiles written by what appear to be good girls that say, "Since Tinder & hookups broke romance, I guess this is all that's left." \
Women let feminists (women who weren't really in the dating\relationship market to begin with) ruin the dating market. I'd say it's up to women to fix it, because men are just going to enjoy the ride.