Or maybe you should find a new troll to run with.
Are feminist willing to give up their "you do not hit a woman" card?
Are feminist willing to give up their "you do not hit a woman" card?
How about we don't hit anyone? Troll around the pond a few more times, I'll keep nibbling.
If women really want to be equal, they have to be willing to get punched by men.
In the name of equality feminist should be demanding women register for the draft, pay their fair share of child support, she work and he stay home with the kids, she work long hours, dangerous jobs and rotating shifts.
Equality, right?
Women should be calling to be incarcerated in prisons in the same proportion as men, too, because equality, I guess.
This is fun.
A new study by Sonja Starr, an assistant law professor at the University of Michigan, found that men are given much higher sentences than women convicted of the same crimes in federal court.
The study found that men receive sentences that are 63 percent higher, on average, than their female counterparts.
Are feminist willing to give up their "you do not hit a woman" card?
Trying to see just how big a jackass you can be?
Women are so lucky that they're never hit!Women carry a lot of cards. They want equality but are not willing to give up their little perks.
Women carry a lot of cards. They want equality but are not willing to give up their little perks.
Trying to see just how big a jackass you can be?
Just being honest.
Women want equality but want certain perks.
Ever considered a sex change? That could be your ticket to the good life.
Is this standup, or is this something you actually believe?I want to see a feminist campaign to repeal the policy of women first when there is an emergency. Should be children first, then children's parents (male or female), then childless males and females last. You know, for equality. What if the child is closer to her father? Should the father still die?
If a feminist does that, I might believe that they actually care about equality.
I want to see a feminist campaign to repeal the policy of women first when there is an emergency. Should be children first, then children's parents (male or female), then childless males and females last. You know, for equality. What if the child is closer to her father? Should the father still die?
If a feminist does that, I might believe that they actually care about equality.
I'd donate to that cause!
I would also donate the entire $5 necessary for someone to write a script to maintain the old TH's presence on these forums. It would bring a tear to the eye and a smile from regulars here, and conversations along the following lines:
What an insightful woman!
Wasn't it amazing how she single-handedly championed several causes for the common downtrodden man, becoming the first female to be drafted, and successfully dismantling the ideology known as feminism after proving that women indeed have had it better than men through a combination of more favourable prison sentences, the myth of violence against them and not getting drafted!
Does this kind of logic work for all kinds of campaigners for equality (that they have to campaign for something that isn't their primary interest before you take them seriously), or just feminists? How about if the Campaigners for Children Then Parents First came along, would they have to do something else first as well?
Will it be a major boost to their campaign to know that you take them seriously, or just one less person who thinks they should prove themselves to him in some random way?
If feminists are for equality, then they should be campaigning for equality in all its forms. This means cases where men are disadvantaged as well as where women are disadvantaged.
However, we all know that feminists do not care about equality. There is nothing wrong about that, as long as they are honest about it.
In case it isn't obvious, Campaigners for Children Then Parents do not claim to be pro equality. Their stance is that children need more support than parents, which is fine.
Have you interviewed every person who self-identifies as a feminist (or can at least cite a survey of thousands of such people), regarding their opinions on various topics regarding equality? I'd like to know how you came to this conclusion (that they're dishonest).Some feminists (the dishonest ones) claim that feminism is really for equality. If you claim to support equality, then any issue in which the genders are not equal merits your attention.
If you claim to be a feminists that supports the rights of women only (which is the reality for all feminists, whether they like to admit it or not), then go ahead and support women's rights, but don't claim to be pro equality.
Sheesh I didn't think it was that difficult to understand.
An organisation that I just made up doesn't claim to be pro equality. Interesting...
Have you interviewed every person who self-identifies as a feminist (or can at least cite a survey of thousands of such people), regarding their opinions on various topics regarding equality? I'd like to know how you came to this conclusion (that they're dishonest).
Furthermore, do you realise that you've contructed a straw man, unless you honestly believe that even if you could find someone who self-identifies as a feminist, claims to be pro equality in general yet isn't really, even then, do you really believe that if you can find one dishonest person (or even a hundred) who follows a particular ideology that it somehow affects all the followers of that ideology?
The name of your made up organisation kinda gave it away they were not pro equality, no?
No it isn't. One can believe that women deserve equal rights to men, and that same person can also believe, let's say that alimony laws do not treat men equally to men (I have no idea about alimony laws in the US, I'm just picking what may as well be a hypothetical example).Quite simply, claiming to be a feminist and claiming to be pro equality are mutually exclusive
Ok, you've found one, me. I'm not sure where that leaves your argument exactly.Find me a feminist who supports fathers rights, for instance.