What lens is this?

[spacejamz]

It is on a Nikon body...


this pic was on the F35 Lighting demo facebook page for the Tinker airshow, but I can't confirm/deny that camera/lens was used to take this...but if it was, my bank account might be in trouble...

 

[biostud]

Looks like 500mm f5.6 nikkor

Nikon 500mm f5.6E PF VR review | Cameralabs

www.cameralabs.com

Or the f4 500mm

Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 500mm f/4E FL ED VR Review | Photography Blog

The Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 500mm f/4E FL ED VR is a new super telephoto lens for Nikon SLR cameras with an FX sized sensor. Read our in-depth Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 500mm f/4E FL ED VR review now...

www.photographyblog.com

 

[spacejamz]

Is that just a massive lens hood?

 

[biostud]

Is that just a massive lens hood?

I think so, yes.

 

[SKORPI0]

Nikon AF-S FX NIKKOR 500 or 600mm f/4E FL ED​

Amazon.com

This super zooms are monstrous and are quite heavy. Expensive too.

Super Telephoto Lenses: Amazing or Overrated?

Last summer I bought a super telephoto lens to capture wildlife in Alaska. After more than half a year of using it as a lens for landscape photography, was it worth it? For most of my photography career, I’ve shot with a very minimal kit in different variations: a camera, 16-35mm super-wide, and...

fstoppers.com

 

[BoomerD]

Nikon AF-S FX NIKKOR 600mm f/4E FL ED​

View attachment 84082

Amazon.com

Damn...that would fit my D3300!!

 

[A///]

Damn...that would fit my D3300!!

Really driving it's the glass not the camera argument. Nikkor lenses at least like op's have never seemed as impressive visually to the average person or laymen what have you compared to canon's usm lenses with that beautiful ivory white.

 

[right_to_know]

They might as well have a rifle stock to hold it and the camera at that size.

 

[sdifox]

Weaksauce

Canon EF 1200mm f/5.6L USM Lens Review

Is the Canon EF 1200mm f/5.6L USM Lens right for you? Learn all you need to know in The-Digital-Picture.com's review!

www.the-digital-picture.com

 

[IronWing]

Who writes a review of a telescope without providing the diameter of the primary objective?

 

[Ajay]

Who writes a review of a telescope without providing the diameter of the primary objective?

I don't know. PPL who can't divide 1200 by 5.6 ;-)