What? No government shutdown threads?

Page 12 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Wait, are you trying to say that the REPUBLICANS are being responsible here?

You cannot possibly be serious. If people are this delusional about what's going on, we are in deep, deep trouble.

I am not using party as political; think of a marriage if you want.

One must live within their means; you do not keep spending without a way of paying for it. Cutting back hurts but it is the fiscal responsible thing to be done.

And looking for excuses to not cut back does not accomplish anything toward the goal.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,620
50,820
136
I am not using party as political; think of a marriage if you want.

One must live within their means; you do not keep spending without a way of paying for it. Cutting back hurts but it is the fiscal responsible thing to be done.

And looking for excuses to not cut back does not accomplish anything toward the goal.

So you're talking about appropriations again. Although I think that cutting appropriations in our current situation is exceptionally foolish, that is a different discussion.

So we both agree that Republicans threatening not to raise the debt ceiling is extremely irresponsible, right?
 

Texashiker

Lifer
Dec 18, 2010
18,811
197
106
Wait, are you trying to say that the REPUBLICANS are being responsible here?

You cannot possibly be serious. If people are this delusional about what's going on, we are in deep, deep trouble.

Of course the republicians are being responsible.

Show me a place where democrats have held power for a long time, and I will show you a place that is bankrupt.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Republicans are fighting this deficit spending in the wrong arena. The spending is already authorized. Using the debt ceiling as a way to cut spending is the worst way to go about it. But that doesnt surprise me they keep banging their head against the wall and losing the public on this potential move.

If they are serious about cutting the deficits and size of govt. The time to do it is when authorizing a budget. Or in the time of Obama apporpriation bills.

But I dont think they want to truely cut spending anyways. So dont expect any meaningful cuts to come from that party.

Edit: One more thing. I'd be for getting rid of the ceiling all together. It really serves little purpose other than to grandstand and then do nothing anyways. It also allows these politicians to vote to spend more then try to look like they are small govt on the back end. Getting rid of the debt ceiling would require them to actually address our spending problems at the time of voting on the spending.
 
Last edited:

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,620
50,820
136
Of course the republicians are being responsible.

Show me a place where democrats have held power for a long time, and I will show you a place that is bankrupt.

You are either ignorant or delusional. None of what you've written makes any sense.

Can you provide me with any credible sources that state that the current Republican threats to force a default are responsible?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,620
50,820
136
Republicans are fighting this deficit spending in the wrong arena. The spending is already authorized. Using the debt ceiling as a way to cut spending is the worst way to go about it. But that doesnt surprise me they keep banging their head against the wall and losing the public on this potential move.

If they are serious about cutting the deficits and size of govt. The time to do it is when authorizing a budget. Or in the time of Obama apporpriation bills.

But I dont think they want to truely cut spending anyways. So dont expect any meaningful cuts to come from that party.

In addition, they are trying to use the debt ceiling to repeal lawfully enacted legislation that they don't like. This is without precedent. No one who understands how our government works should want anyone to have that power as all it will lead to is never ending debt crisis, year after year.

In the future when a Republican is elected president and passes a big tax cut, say the Democrats gain control of a house of Congress. Now they can mandate the tax cut's repeal or they force a debt default. They can mandate an increase in food stamp funding or force a debt default, etc, etc.
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Republicans are fighting this deficit spending in the wrong arena. The spending is already authorized. Using the debt ceiling as a way to cut spending is the worst way to go about it. But that doesnt surprise me they keep banging their head against the wall and losing the public on this potential move.

If they are serious about cutting the deficits and size of govt. The time to do it is when authorizing a budget. Or in the time of Obama apporpriation bills.

But I dont think they want to truely cut spending anyways. So dont expect any meaningful cuts to come from that party.

I can agree on that.....

I'll throw this in (not to bash Boehner but to point out that we've done this for 55 of 60 years and whichever party is in power, it never changes):

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-...plains-why-his-deficit-position-is-phony.html
 

networkman

Lifer
Apr 23, 2000
10,436
1
0
Look, you need to realize something. Enough of the American public, who has been raised to think of today and not tomorrow, generations over now at this point, has been bought with things they never should have had, and the "bill has been 'paid'" with debt. There is no plan to ever pay this debt off. Ever. The Politicians in charge understand this. Their job is simply to keep the populace con game going. How long you ask? Infinitely. Because if the populace were ever to have to feel the affects of not blowing insane amounts of money we don't have, of not actually living not within just their own means, but, the Govs (Fed, state, and local) living within their means, that would be a shitstorm of epic proportions.

That's a great summary there Chucky2 ! Really, I like it!

Now understand this: I and probably Texashiker, most of the Tea Partiers or Teahadists/whatever WANT that shitstorm to happen! REALLY!! We want that to come to pass. We want the status quo to come to an insane crashing halt. We may not be the majority - but we, unlike the rest of the populace, know what reality truly is and embrace it.
 

Texashiker

Lifer
Dec 18, 2010
18,811
197
106
You are either ignorant or delusional. None of what you've written makes any sense.

Insults, the last resort of a weak mind.

I expected more from you.

You have no valid argument supporting the government driving itself or its citizens into debt.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
36,112
30,500
136


We went well past the ceiling/deadline that time and the Treas Sec had to do quite a bit of 'juggling' to keep things together. So, yes, we rolled over debt into new. I.e. default on outstanding debt isn't an issue; issuing new/additional future debt is.

Fern
IIRC, we've been juggling since early this year. The upcoming deadline is when even juggling won't be enough.
 

michal1980

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2003
8,019
43
91
So you're talking about appropriations again. Although I think that cutting appropriations in our current situation is exceptionally foolish, that is a different discussion.

So we both agree that Republicans threatening not to raise the debt ceiling is extremely irresponsible, right?

"The fact that we're here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. Leadership means 'The buck stops here.' Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better. I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America's debt limit"

Your boy.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,620
50,820
136
Insults, the last resort of a weak mind.

I expected more from you.

You have no valid argument supporting the government driving itself or its citizens into debt.

Those aren't insults, those are statements of fact. This entire thread is filled with many, many people giving you piles of valid arguments as to why your position is insane. You have been unable to come up with a single valid argument as to why provoking a worldwide financial crisis is the way to go with here. Instead, you just edit out the arguments you can't answer.

Why can't you provide any credible sources that advocate the same position that you have?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,620
50,820
136
"The fact that we're here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. Leadership means 'The buck stops here.' Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better. I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America's debt limit"

Your boy.

Irrelevant. Whether a policy is good or bad has no relation to what Obama says about it.
 

Texashiker

Lifer
Dec 18, 2010
18,811
197
106
Those aren't insults, those are statements of fact. This entire thread is filled with many, many people giving you piles of valid arguments as to why your position is insane. You have been unable to come up with a single valid argument as to why provoking a worldwide financial crisis is the way to go with here. Instead, you just edit out the arguments you can't answer.

Why can't you provide any credible sources that advocate the same position that you have?

My stance is insane because I do not want the government piling debt on my kids and grandkids?

Do you realize every dollar for the next three generations of tax payers has already been spent?

But for some reason we are supposed to be happy about the government raising the debt ceiling? Hurray, the debt ceiling has been raised, now we owe even more taxes!!! And I am supposed to support that madness?
 

Texashiker

Lifer
Dec 18, 2010
18,811
197
106
No. We've already been over this.

Provide sources that back up your policy preference as being a good idea.

We have been through this.

You provide sources stating massive government debt is good.

Staying out of debt should be common sense.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,620
50,820
136
We have been through this.

You provide sources stating massive government debt is good.

Staying out of debt should be common sense.

No. We are discussing raising the debt limit or not. Links to authoritative sources saying that not raising the debt limit would be catastrophic are a dime a dozen.

Provide sources that back up what you're saying. You won't do this because you can't. Why? Because every credible source out there knows your ideas are insane.
 

kia75

Senior member
Oct 30, 2005
468
0
71
My stance is insane because I do not want the government piling debt on my kids and grandkids?

Do you realize every dollar for the next three generations of tax payers has already been spent?

But for some reason we are supposed to be happy about the government raising the debt ceiling? Hurray, the debt ceiling has been raised, now we owe even more taxes!!! And I am supposed to support that madness?

Your stance is insane because you are WRONG and when you are corrected instead of changing your understanding you state how you WISH the government worked and then use your fantasies to justify your current opinion.

Stating wrong stuff over and over and over without updating your understanding of an issue is insane,especially since you're completely wrong about WHAT the Debt Ceiling is, and about how economics works.
 

BlueWolf47

Senior member
Apr 22, 2005
653
0
76
My stance is insane because I do not want the government piling debt on my kids and grandkids?

Do you realize every dollar for the next three generations of tax payers has already been spent?

But for some reason we are supposed to be happy about the government raising the debt ceiling? Hurray, the debt ceiling has been raised, now we owe even more taxes!!! And I am supposed to support that madness?

And shutting down the government will solve this how again?
 

Texashiker

Lifer
Dec 18, 2010
18,811
197
106
No. We are discussing raising the debt limit or not. Links to authoritative sources saying that not raising the debt limit would be catastrophic are a dime a dozen.

Provide sources that back up what you're saying. You won't do this because you can't. Why? Because every credible source out there knows your ideas are insane.

Lets think outside the box here, so what if the government shuts down?

Maybe the people will start paying attention to what is going on.


Your stance is insane because you are WRONG and when you are corrected instead of changing your understanding you state how you WISH the government worked and then use your fantasies to justify your current opinion.

Stating wrong stuff over and over and over without updating your understanding of an issue is insane,especially since you're completely wrong about WHAT the Debt Ceiling is, and about how economics works.

Let the government shutdown.


And shutting down the government will solve this how again?

Maybe when the sheep go to get their food stamps filled, and the offices are closed, the people will demand real change in government.

Nothing motivates people to action like a hungry stomach.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,620
50,820
136
Lets think outside the box here, so what if the government shuts down?

Maybe the people will start paying attention to what is going on.

Stop trying to change the subject. First, the debt ceiling is not a government shutdown.

Second, PROVIDE SOURCES TO BACK UP WHAT YOU ARE SAYING.
 

BlueWolf47

Senior member
Apr 22, 2005
653
0
76
Lets think outside the box here, so what if the government shuts down?

Maybe the people will start paying attention to what is going on.




Let the government shutdown.




Maybe when the sheep go to get their food stamps filled, and the offices are closed, the people will demand real change in government.

Nothing motivates people to action like a hungry stomach.

Just checking to see if you were actually arguing that shutting down the goverment would have a positive effect on our economy.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |