The admissions staff is the first point of contact about payment. So there goes your premise.
Preposterous is not a synonym for false.
still have nothing.
Who really is full of shit here?
Your full of shit because your calling me a liar, and saying I'm parroting some talking points. But I've came out with that thought since Obama gave his I will not negotiate speech after/during the shooting at the navy base.
At the same time the asshole in the whitehouse is talking to Assad who just gassed his people, he's saying he wont talk to the republicans about the debt ceiling.
Yet you lmsm sheep blame the republicans for not 'compromising'. The great uniter is nothing more then the greatest divider.
What is the name of this charity? The admissions staff takes down insurance information, they do not make determinations of the patients ability to pay, nor would they be the people who would try and work out a payment plan.
If there is a charity out there that is just paying patients' hospital bills without even determining if they can pay them on their own that must be an awfully special charity indeed. I would love to learn more about it.
So the admission staff asked her if she was going to pay or not?
What is the name of this charity? The admissions staff takes down insurance information, they do not make determinations of the patients ability to pay, nor would they be the people who would try and work out a payment plan.
If there is a charity out there that is just paying patients' hospital bills without even determining if they can pay them on their own that must be an awfully special charity indeed. I would love to learn more about it.
I don't know. Employment status is certainly a question they would ask, and she didn't have a job at that time. They would also have asked whether she had sought treatment from a doctor, which she hadn't.
Can I assume that she picked up a job right after that since she had the ability and wanted to pay the bill?
You may continue to assume anything you like. Why stop now?
What do you call the delays the President has made to the ACA, such as the employer mandate? He certainly bypassed Congress there.
You're equating a decision to delay part of a constitutionally affirmed piece of legislation to threatening to shut down the federal government unless a list of demands are met? I can't see how any reasonable person who consider those two things to be similar.
I'm asking you a question. Care to answer it?
So you can call me more names, instead of continuing a civil discussion? No, thanks.
Well, I guess since you won't answer any questions of relevance, there is nothing left but to keep assuming whatever we want and that the previous called names are true. So be it.
Want to give the name and location of the hospital so that I may contact them?
It's a Catholic hospital. Pick one.
How about give the name and location so that I may contact the correct one?
Because it's none of your business which one. It's quite clear that you want to get down in the weeds on this, to find some way to dismiss everything I've said.
Doesn't change the fact that you're not offering any solutions better than what we have. Dragging everyone down to the lowest common denominator is not a viable solution.
So you don't want to answer the question? No other conclusion than you're making it all up then. So be it.
Or you could admit that you simply don't have enough facts to confirm or deny. But that clearly doesn't fit with your desired POV, so you'll go right to the conclusion that makes you feel better.
GL with that.
So you are afraid to answer the question (because it clearly could hurt your desired POV)? I'm looking for the facts but you refuse to assist in getting them.
I've given you all of the relevant facts, and you've chosen to ignore them.
My prediction is that if there is a shut down Ted Cruz will be the fall guy and republicans will blame him. This way they can deny having supported a shut down and make it look like they aren't partisan (like they would be if they blamed it on the dems), and it will have the added affect of pushing out or minimizing the tea party element of the caucus' influence.
You're approaching this as if these were rational actors instead of doomsday cultists. Failure will only convince them more of how right they are.
For Ted cruz and his supporters, you are correct. Everyone else, including republicans, know just how wrong Cruz is.