What? No government shutdown threads?

Page 30 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
The Constitution requires that all taxing and spending be approved by all three elected bodies of government. The House is not empowered outside of the origination of bills and even that is constantly and easily gotten around.

If you do not see a problem with the exact scenario we are going through right now repeating itself every 12 months for the rest of our lives you have a very poor understanding of how to run a government. Imagine if Mitt Romney had been elected and the Democrats were threatening a debt ceiling breach unless he put a public option into the ACA. I challenge you to even try to say with a straight face that you would have the same opinion.

It is baffling to me that you want to enable such irresponsible behavior.

It's how business was run in the past, and it's how business will run in the future.

The only way to stop it is to take the power to fund away from lawmakers.

I live in Illinois. Take a look at what is going on here right now - there is a fight between the Democratic super-majority in the legislature, and the Democratic governor, our governor used his line-item veto to axe the salaries of the legislature! Instead of dealing with the out-of-control pension system, they're going back and forth wasting time and money figuring out whether withholding salaries is constitutional or not.

Shit happens and always will happen. You need a new constitution written to prevent "hostage taking" by a political group.

So we need to have this baseline for discussion that (1) threats will always occur, (2) shut-downs will always be threatened, (3) Armageddon has never occurred any of the many previous times the fed gov't was shut down.

For the record, I do not fear a government shutdown. If it happens then it happens.




Your argument can so easily be turned right around - do we want the precedent set for one political party to dominate crafting of an extremely major piece of legislation and pushed through congress the way Obamacare was? Flawed legislation pushed through then a second piece of legislation pushed through reconciliation? Do you ever want to see Republicans control Washington that way?

(you also described the relationship between unions and business owners)
 
Last edited:

Lithium381

Lifer
May 12, 2001
12,452
2
0
The only way they lose is if they quit the fight and aren't vocal about the real reason for the shutdown - Harry Reid and Obama. The House has passed budget after budget but the Senate won't vote. Now we have a CR that the house has passed and the Senate will vote it down along party lines each time. Yet somehow it's the R's fault for not funding the worst thing since Social Security. Reid and Obama keep saying it's a principle thing and the leftists(and media) are eating it up yet somehow it's terroristic and hostage taking for the Republicans to take a principled stand and not fund obamacare.

Pat Buchannon had a piece that summed it up nicely(not posting the link because the leftists wont read it due to where it's hosted)

THE GOP doens't have a good track record of sticking to its guns recently. My reasoning is the same as Eskimo's. .. they voted to spend the money and now they're not allowing the mechanisms to operate properly to pay for it. Irresponsible.

And on the issue of compromise. . . it would be akin to the Senate to put in a provision that "marriage is now defined as 1) a man and a man or 2)a woman and a woman" and that "the border is now open and the military is defunded" and then acting suprised that the GOP in the House rejected it. . . :hmm:
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,620
50,820
136
"threatening global financial stability"?



Fern

Sigh. When your arguments are exposed as being terrible you then just go "well it won't be that bad anyway". Why is it that there is never a re-examination of your position, only new justifications for the same old one?
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
THE GOP doens't have a good track record of sticking to its guns recently. My reasoning is the same as Eskimo's. .. they voted to spend the money and now they're not allowing the mechanisms to operate properly to pay for it. Irresponsible.

And on the issue of compromise. . . it would be akin to the Senate to put in a provision that "marriage is now defined as 1) a man and a man or 2)a woman and a woman" and that "the border is now open and the military is defunded" and then acting suprised that the GOP in the House rejected it. . . :hmm:

For sure they don't have a good track record. There are too many who care what the media will write instead of what's best for the nation.
I don't care if they allowed it to pass, it doesn't mean it NEEDs to be funded in a continuing resolution - ESPECIALLY since Reid and the Senate won't pass a budget(how long has it been now?)

your last part has nothing to do with the issue. Obamacare should never be funded and would never pass again so it's nothing like trying to slip something extra into a bill like you are suggesting. It just isn't the same - not even close.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,620
50,820
136
On a slightly different note, the GOP has no real way to prevent the implementation of the ACA. Most of the funding for it is not discretionary funding so a government shutdown actually doesn't do that much to the bill itself.

Secondly, it seems like if Congress won't raise the debt ceiling Obama's best bet would probably be just to ignore it. Ignoring the debt ceiling is no more illegal than following it, as either way he is violating the law. (federal law mandates he spend X dollars that must be borrowed, the debt ceiling law says he's not allowed to borrow the money to follow the law)
 

michal1980

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2003
8,019
43
91
On a slightly different note, the GOP has no real way to prevent the implementation of the ACA. Most of the funding for it is not discretionary funding so a government shutdown actually doesn't do that much to the bill itself.

Secondly, it seems like if Congress won't raise the debt ceiling Obama's best bet would probably be just to ignore it. Ignoring the debt ceiling is no more illegal than following it, as either way he is violating the law. (federal law mandates he spend X dollars that must be borrowed, the debt ceiling law says he's not allowed to borrow the money to follow the law)

We know that you on the left like the fact that Obama is a dictator. I cannot wait until a republican comes in an pulls the same shit on you.

Union laws... fuck them not enforced. Welfare laws, Fuck them, ignore. ACA, what ACA? ignored.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,620
50,820
136
For sure they don't have a good track record. There are too many who care what the media will write instead of what's best for the nation.
I don't care if they allowed it to pass, it doesn't mean it NEEDs to be funded in a continuing resolution - ESPECIALLY since Reid and the Senate won't pass a budget(how long has it been now?)

your last part has nothing to do with the issue. Obamacare should never be funded and would never pass again so it's nothing like trying to slip something extra into a bill like you are suggesting. It just isn't the same - not even close.

You realize the senate passed a budget earlier this year and then when the democrats tried to go to conference to reconcile the house and senate bills the House Republicans refused, right?

It was hilarious, they whined for years about the senate not passing a budget and then ran away when they did which shows they were never serious to begin with. You probably don't want to remind people of that.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,620
50,820
136
We know that you on the left like the fact that Obama is a dictator. I cannot wait until a republican comes in an pulls the same shit on you.

Union laws... fuck them not enforced. Welfare laws, Fuck them, ignore. ACA, what ACA? ignored.

Stop acting like a child. Congress has now directed the executive to do two mutually exclusive things. What is he supposed to do?
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,532
15,413
136
The only way they lose is if they quit the fight and aren't vocal about the real reason for the shutdown - Harry Reid and Obama. The House has passed budget after budget but the Senate won't vote. Now we have a CR that the house has passed and the Senate will vote it down along party lines each time. Yet somehow it's the R's fault for not funding the worst thing since Social Security. Reid and Obama keep saying it's a principle thing and the leftists(and media) are eating it up yet somehow it's terroristic and hostage taking for the Republicans to take a principled stand and not fund obamacare.

Pat Buchannon had a piece that summed it up nicely(not posting the link because the leftists wont read it due to where it's hosted)

More ignorance proudly displayed! The senate has voted and the bill was sent down to the house, Bhoener won't let it come to the standard majority rules vote and is instead continuing with the majority of the majority rule in order to bring things to a vote.

But don't let facts get in the way of your ignorance

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...ith-clock-ticking-to-government-shutdown.html

All it would take is Boehner working with Nancy Pelosi to get Democratic support for that clean CR. That would mean abandoning the so-called Hastert Rule, named after former House speaker Dennis Hastert, that no legislation is brought to the House floor without a majority of Republican votes. Boehner has violated the rule at least twice before, most recently to approve federal funds for the victims of Hurricane Sandy.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
48,045
37,235
136
You realize the senate passed a budget earlier this year and then when the democrats tried to go to conference to reconcile the house and senate bills the House Republicans refused, right?

It was hilarious, they whined for years about the senate not passing a budget and then ran away when they did which shows they were never serious to begin with. You probably don't want to remind people of that.

The GOP caucus can't negotiate as a cohesive body, thus no real compromise is possible on the budget. You cannot make a deal with someone who has no power to make good.
They invited the crazy in to win elections but it's poisoned the entire political process.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,532
15,413
136
lol at the desperation of the left to get this boondoggle funded. DOOM, GLOOM, SKY IS FALLING, HOSTAGES!!!

By boondoggle, I assume you mean the government, as the ACA is already funded and a government shutdown wouldn't change that.

But I'm sure you knew hat already.
 

michal1980

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2003
8,019
43
91
Stop acting like a child. Congress has now directed the executive to do two mutually exclusive things. What is he supposed to do?

Tell Reid to work with the republicans?

But we all know he's incapable of that. from the passing of Obamacare to today, Obama has done nothing but vilify republicans. He talks about compromise but never does himself.

He talks about negotiating with terrorists, but not with the republicans.

He's the one that said having to vote for a debt ceiling increase is a failure of leadership.

Guess what, He failed. Obama failed as a leader.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,620
50,820
136
Tell Reid to work with the republicans?

But we all know he's incapable of that. from the passing of Obamacare to today, Obama has done nothing but vilify republicans. He talks about compromise but never does himself.

He talks about negotiating with terrorists, but not with the republicans.

He's the one that said having to vote for a debt ceiling increase is a failure of leadership.

Guess what, He failed. Obama failed as a leader.

Work with them on fulfilling their ransom demands? I keep asking you for even a single thing the Republicans have shown a willingness to compromise on. You can't answer because you know there isn't one.

All that aside, you called Obama a dictator after I suggested he simply ignore the debt ceiling and then when I asked you to elaborate you dodged the question. If we breach the debt ceiling Obama will have two mutually exclusive legal obligations to meet. How do you suggest he does this?
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
You realize the senate passed a budget earlier this year and then when the democrats tried to go to conference to reconcile the house and senate bills the House Republicans refused, right?

It was hilarious, they whined for years about the senate not passing a budget and then ran away when they did which shows they were never serious to begin with. You probably don't want to remind people of that.

lol, you keep believing that if it helps you sleep but it wasn't even close to a real budget. BTW, the budget doesn't come from them...but anyway...

oh and where has Reid been on trying to reconcile the House bills? Yeah... that's what I thought - he won't come close to touching them so don't even try to make this an "R" thing.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Work with them on fulfilling their ransom demands? I keep asking you for even a single thing the Republicans have shown a willingness to compromise on. You can't answer because you know there isn't one.

All that aside, you called Obama a dictator after I suggested he simply ignore the debt ceiling and then when I asked you to elaborate you dodged the question. If we breach the debt ceiling Obama will have two mutually exclusive legal obligations to meet. How do you suggest he does this?

lol at your desperation. "ranson demands"? get a clue. This isn't a "crisis", the world won't end, and the sky isn't falling. If BHO and Reid truly thought it was a crisis they would allow the delay in funding obamacare to preserve the rest.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,620
50,820
136
lol, you keep believing that if it helps you sleep but it wasn't even close to a real budget. BTW, the budget doesn't come from them...but anyway...

oh and where has Reid been on trying to reconcile the House bills? Yeah... that's what I thought - he won't come close to touching them so don't even try to make this an "R" thing.

What are you even talking about anymore? Budgets can come from either the house or the senate as they don't actually appropriate any funds. It was absolutely a budget, and didn't you read my earlier post? Reid and the Senate Democrats asked the House to go to conference on their budgets (which is how you reconcile the two bills) and the House refused.

You clearly have no idea what you're talking about and you said something obviously, unequivocally wrong. Just own up to it and move on.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,620
50,820
136
lol at your desperation. "ranson demands"? get a clue. This isn't a "crisis", the world won't end, and the sky isn't falling. If BHO and Reid truly thought it was a crisis they would allow the delay in funding obamacare to preserve the rest.

There's no desperation as to the fate of the ACA, as I said before most of the funding isn't subject to government shutdowns. The Republicans really can't do much to it. My worry is for the fate of our economy as a whole and the world economy.

I'm nearly certain I'm going to win on the ACA part, I'm just trying to make sure the crazies don't fuck up the world economy on their way down. If you understood the debt ceiling you wouldn't be laughing.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
More ignorance proudly displayed! The senate has voted and the bill was sent down to the house, Bhoener won't let it come to the standard majority rules vote and is instead continuing with the majority of the majority rule in order to bring things to a vote.

But don't let facts get in the way of your ignorance

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...ith-clock-ticking-to-government-shutdown.html

lol talk about ignorance... nothing you posted goes against what I did. Your article is nothing more than the other side's view(vs Buchannon's). but give yourself a high-five if you must... :\
 

Juddog

Diamond Member
Dec 11, 2006
7,851
6
81
Basically another "let's screw the country for political gain" move by the GOP.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
There's no desperation as to the fate of the ACA, as I said before most of the funding isn't subject to government shutdowns. The Republicans really can't do much to it. My worry is for the fate of our economy as a whole and the world economy.

I'm nearly certain I'm going to win on the ACA part, I'm just trying to make sure the crazies don't fuck up the world economy on their way down. If you understood the debt ceiling you wouldn't be laughing.

Uhh... The economy won't crash due to this, nor will the world's economy. Your doomsday BS is nothing but stupidity. We've had shutdowns before, this isn't something new.
The only "crazies" fucking up our economy is BHO, Reid, and Pelosi - they've been doing it for quite a few years now and Obamacare will ensure more fail in the years to come. It must be stopped.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,620
50,820
136
Uhh... The economy won't crash due to this, nor will the world's economy. Your doomsday BS is nothing but stupidity. We've had shutdowns before, this isn't something new.
The only "crazies" fucking up our economy is BHO, Reid, and Pelosi - they've been doing it for quite a few years now and Obamacare will ensure more fail in the years to come. It must be stopped.

We have never had a debt ceiling breach before, which is what I have clearly mentioned is what will cause our economy to crash. The CR nonsense is small potatoes compared to that, but they are clearly intimately related.

You can't stop the ACA. You already lost that fight (repeatedly). The only thing you can do is fuck up the country on your way down. What's sad is that you might be stupid and childish enough to think that's a good idea.
 

Juddog

Diamond Member
Dec 11, 2006
7,851
6
81
We have never had a debt ceiling breach before, which is what I have clearly mentioned is what will cause our economy to crash. The CR nonsense is small potatoes compared to that, but they are clearly intimately related.

You can't stop the ACA. You already lost that fight (repeatedly). The only thing you can do is fuck up the country on your way down. What's sad is that you might be stupid and childish enough to think that's a good idea.

That's what's happening here - "I'm going to take my ball and go home" by little Timmy because he threw a temper tantrum and didn't get what he wanted.

Risk crashing and burning the entire countries economy because they had a temper tantrum - gotta love the GOP.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |