So if it's so necessary why are any exemptions being written against it?
No, he decided the other way was too hard.
Bitch.
Liar.
The individual mandate is a necessary function for the law to work. How hard is this to understand?
So if it's so necessary why are any exemptions being written against it?
I know what a straw man is. It is a misrepresentation of your opponent's position. Unfortunately for you, sportage never claimed any of that was michal's position. He was simply showing parallel logic.Sure was. Maybe you should? :hmm:
So now you can read Obama's mind?
wise and beautiful woman.
Hey, we can play this game all day!
I know what a straw man is. It is a misrepresentation of your opponent's position. Unfortunately for you, sportage never claimed any of that was michal's position. He was simply showing parallel logic.
No, they've been talking about it all morning, people noticed.
The individual mandate is nothing more than forced servitude.
Markets are up! Wall Street likee.
and violates numerous state constitutions, wait until those hit the USSC. The Democrats will shit bricks.
It was part of the initial demand along with the Contra funding issue. Compromise was eventually reached by Dems backing off the Fairness Doctrine issue and negotiating on the Contra spending issue. To frame it as tertiary is bullshit...it was one of major disagreements that Dems cited as justification for the shutdown.No it was not, and it was a tertiary demand, not the source of the shutdown.
Wouldn't take long, he doesn't have much of one.
Fuckstain.
Why would the ACA violating a state constitution matter?
No, he didn't. He asked if he supported his position, why not support these others as well.The hell he didn't, are you blind? He purposely set up ridiculous parallels, as if the person he was quoting would support them too.
Because the current USSC won't let it trump states' rights, Roberts won't let that happen.
Don't believe the stuff you hear when Cruz & Lee are stuffing it into you, they're just mad at Obama.
Shithead.
Markets are up! Wall Street likee.
Because the current USSC won't let it trump states' rights, Roberts won't let that happen.
Such as?
You're clueless. The constitutionality of the ACA has already been upheld by SCOTUS. That's the end of the story. The only question was if the ACA was a valid exercise of federal power, and it was ruled to be so. If the federal government's exercise of power is valid, it immediately overrides anything the states do.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supremacy_Clause
After you get out of economics class, head across the hall to civics 101.
It appears we can add Civics to the list of subjects you know little to nothing about.