its not legal in most states. You can get away with it if you tint the front 50 percent. What it also does is lower the total amount of light entering a car so it makes 35 percent or whatever else you running seem a little darker too. Win Win.
Man, I wish it was legal to tint my font windshield. I'd definitely do it.
yeah, blue blockers probably dont last long. sucks to be you.
its not legal in most states. You can get away with it if you tint the front 50 percent. What it also does is lower the total amount of light entering a car so it makes 35 percent or whatever else you running seem a little darker too. Win Win.
Sunglasses like your clothes are a wear item. It's really about what one can afford. I don't know why so many are making excuses for that.
I am lucky to get 6 months out of a pair of sun glasses.
Maybe you should quit rolling in them. Waste is not a virtue.I am lucky to get 6 months out of a pair of sun glasses.
Excuse?, no, more like "common sense", if sunglass "style" is that important to you than go ahead and pay the "style" tax of $600/yr for being stylish, I only make 46-49K per year, would it be smart to blow $600 of that on friggin sunglasses?..
its not legal in most states. You can get away with it if you tint the front 50 percent. What it also does is lower the total amount of light entering a car so it makes 35 percent or whatever else you running seem a little darker too. Win Win.
You don't have to spend $600 a year. I think mine cost about $200 or so, and quite honestly, I barely use them (I think I've had them for about 2 years). It's rare that the sun bothers me enough to wear my sunglasses, but if I have to wear sunglasses, I don't want to wear crappy ones.
What happens outside the car, do you run rock to rock?
Quite honestly, I'd like to just put some 90% tint on the whole front windshield. I just want to keep most of the heat out, and tinting everything BUT the front windshield only goes so far. I don't have a problem with wearing sunglasses if the sun bothers me.
$7 pair i got at Napa.
their also safety certified polycarbonite lenses. can't beat that price. i think the expensive brand name ones are a bad joke that only stupid people get
Oh no man, us cheap folk are missing out on the technology Oakley offers, here's from their website, :" The pure Plutonite® lenses meet ANSI standards of impact protection while filtering out 100% of all UV and harmful blue light."
See, ours don't have "Plutonite" lenses, we're still living in the Flintstones age of sunglass technology... :'(
I use to want Oakley's back when I was in high school. Now I couldn't care less about the brand on my sunglasses or clothes.
Oh no man, us cheap folk are missing out on the technology Oakley offers, here's from their website, :" The pure Plutonite® lenses meet ANSI standards of impact protection while filtering out 100% of all UV and harmful blue light."
See, ours don't have "Plutonite" lenses, we're still living in the Flintstones age of sunglass technology... :'(
Meh, I've tried on some Ray-bans and they are nice sunglasses just not enough of a difference (IMO) to justify the extra $100. Here in FL sunglasses get used a lot so they have a tendency to get beat up or lost quickly..
I would tell you but I refuse to converse with infantile, dipwads that use "rolling" and "rocking" in this manner.
Sunglasses like your clothes are a wear item. It's really about what one can afford. I don't know why so many are making excuses for that.
I am lucky to get 6 months out of a pair of sun glasses.
Quite honestly, I'd like to just put some 90% tint on the whole front windshield. I just want to keep most of the heat out, and tinting everything BUT the front windshield only goes so far. I don't have a problem with wearing sunglasses if the sun bothers me.
I think it has to do with preference rather than affordability. One of my clients is a 40-something corporate litigation lawyer, head of one of the largest firms in Texas. Needless to say he could afford whatever sunglasses he wants, but I've only ever seen him wearing Wayfarers, which are relatively cheap. I find the same thing with very rich people and cars, by conservative estimates I think he must pull in 75-100 million/year, but his regular car is always just a current-year S-class. He could drive a new Bentley or Rolls or whatever he wanted, but I don't think he really cares that much. Now get him talking about golf, well he'll spend $40k on some golf gear inside half an hour. Passion.
I personally just tend to lose the damned things, lol. I can afford to spend maybe $75-$150 on a pair every couple of months without noticing at all, so I'm not rich or poor, but I've noticed the quality of cheapies has gotten much much much better over the years, so I'm not really concerned about brand names at this point. I have nobody to impress other than my eyes I like the feeling of losing the pair and completely not caring. There are other items which I am much more picky about, and am willing to spend a premium on, but sunglasses just aren't one of those items. Ditto watches, I love cool watches, and some of the brands are badass, I have a Tag that's a good one for the price, and an awesome Vollmer, but some of the best watches I've ever gotten have been $10 understated knockoffs from Canal St, which sometimes last for years and years, despite being made with slave labor in some Chinese hell.