what to do with a really old computer

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

wpeng

Senior member
Aug 10, 2000
368
0
0
Hey, Phooey, that's the other suggestion I've heard of. Turning it into a firewall/router. How do you go about doing that? And with which version of Linux?
 

Tostada

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,789
0
0
I know for a fact I've set up a few IBM PS/2 machines that had 486's in them and 16MB RAM, and they ran very well with the 1st edition of Win95, and they were quite tolerable using Internet Explorer as long as you didn't install IE4 or Java support. I put Opera on them, and it was a little faster.

They ran IE and Office quite well until you installed IE4 with the desktop update thingy and java support it adds.
 

JonathanYoung

Senior member
Aug 15, 2003
379
0
71
Here's what I run with my 486SX2-66 and 16MB (edit: not 64MB) RAM:

Windows 95 OSR2
Netscape 4
mIRC
Doom
Doom 2
Wing Commander 1
Wing Commander 2
Massage SMS emulator
MS Office 95
Twinbridge Chinese WP

So, even though my 486 is a piece of crap relative to my Athlon XP, it's still very useful as a spare (and quiet) computer.
 

CraigRT

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
31,440
5
0
donate!!!
i give them away to my old high school.
they are COMPLETELY useless for anything in the office.
 

Bleep

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
3,972
0
0
what's a skip? is english your first language?

What a a$$!! Just because you do not know what a skip is does that make the poster ignorant?

You probably dont know what a Frap is either, so I guess you are the one that needs language training.

Bleep
 

Tostada

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,789
0
0
Originally posted by: JonathanYoung
Here's what I run with my 486SX2-66 and 64MB RAM:

Windows 95 OSR2
Netscape 4
mIRC
Doom
Doom 2
Wing Commander 1
Wing Commander 2
Massage SMS emulator
MS Office 95
Twinbridge Chinese WP

So, even though my 486 is a piece of crap relative to my Athlon XP, it's still very useful as a spare (and quiet) computer.

Well, with 64MB you're set. You could run Win98 SE just fine if you wanted to. The original poster, however, refuses to tell us how much RAM he has.

It's likely around 8 - 16MB. When Win95 was released, 8MB was pretty standard but you wanted 16MB. The best way to get decent performance is to have the original release of Win95 and strip it down a little.

I had 64MB EDO in a Cyrix in late 1996, which was pretty unheard of and cost me a little over $400 just for the memory. There's not much chance of him having more than 16MB in a 486SX unless they gave it a big upgrade around 1997-98.
 

So

Lifer
Jul 2, 2001
25,921
14
81
Originally posted by: Bleep
what's a skip? is english your first language?

What a a$$!! Just because you do not know what a skip is does that make the poster ignorant?

You probably dont know what a Frap is either, so I guess you are the one that needs language training.

Bleep

Sorry, geez, the two were unrelated.

"skip an jus exploeded in a" read like pidgen to me, I had to ask.

Seriously, tho', what's a skip?

The only Frap I'm aware of is in 'Fraps'

Don't flame, enlighten me, I wasn't trying to flame. Both were sreious questions.
 

Delorian

Senior member
Mar 10, 2004
590
0
0
for all of you looking to play old abandonware, check out dosbox. It has some incompatibilities but I've found much more of my old games will play than won't.

dosbox rules!
 

Phooey

Member
Jul 1, 2000
42
0
0
Originally posted by: wpeng
Hey, Phooey, that's the other suggestion I've heard of. Turning it into a firewall/router. How do you go about doing that? And with which version of Linux?

Just install an older version of Linux (I used redhat 6.2 on a Pentium 133Mhz w/32MB EDO RAM) then if you are not familiar with configuring IPTables on your own you could run an easy to setup script like PM Firewall. The hardest part will be installing the drivers for the ethernet cards. One ethernet card will connect to your Cable/DSL modem, the other to a local switch/hub on your network.

With a little added effort you can get a DHCP server running as well.
 

vegetation

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2001
4,270
2
0
Originally posted by: sisooktom
Originally posted by: Tostada
Originally posted by: wpeng
My parents recently ran across our old 486 computer in the basement. They said we should just throw it out. What else is there to do with old computers? I've been told you can do *something* with it, but I don't remember. I can't donate it. No one would want to buy it. It probably won't be worth anything in the next 50 years.

Should I just throw it out?

The important part is how much RAM it has. If you have a couple of old computers and you can get together more than 16MB of RAM, you can actually make a machine that runs Win95 plenty fast. Obviously it's not worth the price of buying more memory for it, though, so if it has less than 16MB, I'd just save the RAM and throw the machine away.

A full install of the original Win95 can fit in 20MB if you pull out a few stupid things like MSN. You'd be surprised how fast it is for using Office 97 or earlier stuff.

The real problem is when you try to install Internet Explorer. If you install IE4 or higher, the whole machine will instantly drag to a halt, even when you're not using the browser. As long as you don't do that, it's a decent machine for some things.

If you install something like Firefox without JAVA support, the machine should be decent for some web surfing.


Uhh, no. I had a 486SX 25. The thing was a POS from the day it was released. It's not even a true 486, as the data bus is only 16 bits wide. Hence the SX moniker. I seriously doubt the box will run Win95, and even if it did, even Firefox would be unusably slow.

Actually, the SX of the Intel 486 line just lacks an FPU and is a full 32 bit path -- the SX of the 386 line was a 16 bit memory bus and none of them had an onboard FPU. I believe the Cyrix 486SX clones only had a 16 bit memory bus so you may have had one of those. Even a 486-66 is too slow for a fun web experience though. I remember slow 486's would pause noticeably just decompressing jpegs. You could disable all image loading in a web browser I suppose, but why would anyone want to go through that. If you want to play old games, then I suppose it's worth that. But running an OS to view web pages is out of the question unless you enjoy torture. The ideas of turning it into a router may have been feasible 6 years ago when routers would cost over $100 but when you can get one free after rebate, or a wireless router for $20 these days, it just makes no sense, plus wastes electricity. In my experience, the minimum for an old-machine to play around with would be at least a pentium classic -- they display web pages fast and can run up to win98 without sweat.
 

sisooktom

Senior member
Apr 9, 2004
262
0
76
Originally posted by: vegetation
Actually, the SX of the Intel 486 line just lacks an FPU and is a full 32 bit path -- the SX of the 386 line was a 16 bit memory bus and none of them had an onboard FPU. I believe the Cyrix 486SX clones only had a 16 bit memory bus so you may have had one of those. Even a 486-66 is too slow for a fun web experience though. I remember slow 486's would pause noticeably just decompressing jpegs. You could disable all image loading in a web browser I suppose, but why would anyone want to go through that. If you want to play old games, then I suppose it's worth that. But running an OS to view web pages is out of the question unless you enjoy torture. The ideas of turning it into a router may have been feasible 6 years ago when routers would cost over $100 but when you can get one free after rebate, or a wireless router for $20 these days, it just makes no sense, plus wastes electricity. In my experience, the minimum for an old-machine to play around with would be at least a pentium classic -- they display web pages fast and can run up to win98 without sweat.

No, I had a genuine Intel 486 SX. Trust me, it was a 16 bit data bus. The registers were 32 bit, therefore I guess technically it was a 486, but it was pretty crippled. You are correct that it lacked an FPU. Anyway, we pretty much agree that it is useless for anything other than a paperweight nowadays
 

eldorado99

Lifer
Feb 16, 2004
36,324
3,163
126
haha, I remember when I went to the computer store with my dad shortly after buying our first computer ever, he paid $200 for 2 MB of ram, we paid $1100 for our 486 DX 66 w/ 2 MB RAM about a month earlier.
 

JonathanYoung

Senior member
Aug 15, 2003
379
0
71
Originally posted by: Tostada
Well, with 64MB you're set. You could run Win98 SE just fine if you wanted to. The original poster, however, refuses to tell us how much RAM he has.

It's likely around 8 - 16MB. When Win95 was released, 8MB was pretty standard but you wanted 16MB. The best way to get decent performance is to have the original release of Win95 and strip it down a little.

I had 64MB EDO in a Cyrix in late 1996, which was pretty unheard of and cost me a little over $400 just for the memory. There's not much chance of him having more than 16MB in a 486SX unless they gave it a big upgrade around 1997-98.

Sorry, my mistake! I was thinking of my Pentium 200, which *does* have 64MB RAM. My 486 only has 16MB of RAM. Original post has been edited.

So yeah, even though it's old and only has 16MB of RAM, it's still pretty useful. As for the question of websurfing, even though I have Netscape on there, it's not worth using anymore because most webpages don't render correctly on that browser anymore. You could always use it for instant messaging though!

Finally, I want to point out that even though my 486 isn't that fast, it loads up Win95 very quickly, and shuts down even faster (less than a second without any open apps).
 

GullyFoyle

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2000
4,362
11
81
Remove the motherboard, and pop in a pentium 1 board (with CPU and RAM) that people can't give away on the freebies thread, and you'll have more options.
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
37,822
8,294
136
Originally posted by: sisooktom
Originally posted by: vegetation
Actually, the SX of the Intel 486 line just lacks an FPU and is a full 32 bit path -- the SX of the 386 line was a 16 bit memory bus and none of them had an onboard FPU. I believe the Cyrix 486SX clones only had a 16 bit memory bus so you may have had one of those. Even a 486-66 is too slow for a fun web experience though. I remember slow 486's would pause noticeably just decompressing jpegs. You could disable all image loading in a web browser I suppose, but why would anyone want to go through that. If you want to play old games, then I suppose it's worth that. But running an OS to view web pages is out of the question unless you enjoy torture. The ideas of turning it into a router may have been feasible 6 years ago when routers would cost over $100 but when you can get one free after rebate, or a wireless router for $20 these days, it just makes no sense, plus wastes electricity. In my experience, the minimum for an old-machine to play around with would be at least a pentium classic -- they display web pages fast and can run up to win98 without sweat.

No, I had a genuine Intel 486 SX. Trust me, it was a 16 bit data bus. The registers were 32 bit, therefore I guess technically it was a 486, but it was pretty crippled. You are correct that it lacked an FPU. Anyway, we pretty much agree that it is useless for anything other than a paperweight nowadays
My first computer I bought used and it was a 486DX33 on a proprietary local bus MB. Visa Local Bus standard hadn't been arrived at yet. This thing came with 4 MB RAM, and Windows 3.1 It's true, the 486SX lacked a math coprocessor, but mine had it. Not long afterward I bought a Cyrix 486DX66 Intel replacement CPU, and it worked fine in that box. Picked up 4 100 MB chips at a computer show and had 8 MB, upgraded to Windows for Workgroups 3.1, a significant improvement over Windows 3.1. I think it incorporated some 32 bit processing - the reading and writing to HD aspects. After a while, I upgraded that machine to 20 MB and Win95 OSR2. Something started oozing on the MB and I got rid of the box, but I still have the CPUs and RAM, including the original 486DX33! Still have my second computer, though, which I built from the ground up, a Tyan Tomcat 1. Maybe I'll bring it to Office Depot next week. My next two boxes I still use. Will Office Depot accept parts or just whole computers?
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,442
10,113
126
Originally posted by: Tostada
Originally posted by: wpeng
My parents recently ran across our old 486 computer in the basement. They said we should just throw it out. What else is there to do with old computers? I've been told you can do *something* with it, but I don't remember. I can't donate it. No one would want to buy it. It probably won't be worth anything in the next 50 years.

Should I just throw it out?

The important part is how much RAM it has. If you have a couple of old computers and you can get together more than 16MB of RAM, you can actually make a machine that runs Win95 plenty fast. Obviously it's not worth the price of buying more memory for it, though, so if it has less than 16MB, I'd just save the RAM and throw the machine away.

A full install of the original Win95 can fit in 20MB if you pull out a few stupid things like MSN. You'd be surprised how fast it is for using Office 97 or earlier stuff.

The real problem is when you try to install Internet Explorer. If you install IE4 or higher, the whole machine will instantly drag to a halt, even when you're not using the browser. As long as you don't do that, it's a decent machine for some things.

If you install something like Firefox without JAVA support, the machine should be decent for some web surfing.

Firefox? On that machine? hahahaha. Have you ever tried it, on a 486-class CPU, or on a machine with less than 128MB of RAM? Trust me, I have. It wasn't pretty. Java has nothing to do with it.

If a machine has 16MB of RAM or less, use Win95 (gold) + patches, and IE 3.02. If a machine has 16-48MB of RAM, use Win98se, and IE 5.01 SP2. If a machine has 64MB of RAM or more, either install W2K and disable all unnecessary services (still kinda sluggish), or Win98se again, and maybe Firefox, if the system has a Pentium or faster CPU. Avoid XP unless the system has 192MB or more of RAM and a 233Mhz or faster CPU.

To the OP:
Honestly? Yeah, a 486 is junk, throw it out, but do so properly so it doesn't harm the environment. Keeping it running, is a waste of energy, in the global scheme of things. If the system has a PCI video card, or a decent-sized HD, or some "big" sizes of RAM (32MB or larger SIMMs or DIMMs), you might be able to sell those parts on EBay for a few bucks, and would more than pay for the disposal of the rest of the PC.

Heck, a 486 isn't even fast enough to play MP3s on. :| (Worse yet, I've got several machines of that class sitting in storage myself, can't really decide on what to do with them either. Anyone need a boat anchor?)

To all:
Related to all of this.. how "usable" these days, is a machine of the next-higher class? like a Pentium 166-233Mhz, 24-48MB of RAM, 2-8GB of HD space, has PCI slots, etc? That would seem still almost-usable, in some cases, but not for me personally. What's a good way to get rid of (donate?) a machine like that?

Something like that can play MP3s, and some MPGs, but it struggles with DiVX video files. Web-browsing is probably alright. Emulators and games, not so great, unless they are really old DOS games. I have a couple of those "junkers" lying around too.
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,442
10,113
126
Originally posted by: paendragon
Dunno if this is your cup of tea - but here's what I did once -

One year while I was working at a medical center in Houston, we were given dozens of out-dated computers (386's & 486's with an occasional odd pentium 100/133 thrown in the mix) and told to discard them. So we took them out to the industrial trash dumpster out behind the facility and made a day out of experimenting on how those suckers came apart when dropped, beat, kicked etc etc.

We all spend so much time protecting our precious, expensive rigs, so it was just such a wild experience that cut against the grain, destroying all those machines...very surreal...and half way into it - the beast inside comes out and oh man is it fun! like being 10 years-old again, shooting B*B's at glass windows (ohyeah - don't do that...parents don't dig it...not to mention the cops).

pd

Uhm, please tell me that you've seen the movie 'Office Space'?
 

BespinReactorShaft

Diamond Member
Jun 9, 2004
3,190
0
0
Originally posted by: sisooktom
Uhh, no. I had a 486SX 25. The thing was a POS from the day it was released. It's not even a true 486, as the data bus is only 16 bits wide. Hence the SX moniker.


SX == SuX

The only time I recall ever going for the highest end was when I purchased my 486 DX4 100MHz (it's an amd, though). At that time the DX2/66MHz was still the standard. With the kind of money spent then, I could easily get a pretty respectable P4 3.2 GHz rig today. Maybe except for a X800/6800....
 

BespinReactorShaft

Diamond Member
Jun 9, 2004
3,190
0
0
Originally posted by: Delorian
for all of you looking to play old abandonware, check out dosbox. It has some incompatibilities but I've found much more of my old games will play than won't.

dosbox rules!

Yeah, it finally got Star Control 2 running with my soundcard though it still stutters intermittently. The free UrQuan Masters is pretty good too but nothing replaces the original. Other titles I'm gonna try out under dosbox include LucasArts' Full Throttle, System Shock I, and Hexen Deathkings mission pack.

Still, there are some titles that just simply require an 286 16MHz at most. Wing Commander I, Ultima VI, and the rest of Origin Systems' CRPG titles (Martian Dreams, Savage Empire, Bad Blood...) come to mind.
 

M16Grenadier

Senior member
Jul 14, 2004
203
0
0
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
my college has a big clean out of junk computers every couple of years......we jus got all brand new dell pc's with TFT's and CD-Rw, the old dell's (celeron 500's) go in the basment..called the bunker, and the ones that were in there....286's and 486's n a few pentium pro's simply went in a skip! all 100+ of them

so much fun.......how high can u throw a 286?, how far away from the skip can u manage? mine was the best i threw a 486 and it caught the corner of the skip an jus exploeded in a shower of dust and PCB


Pentium Pros and Celeron 500s aren't the PCs you should be chucking around.

286/386/486, yeah, but not Pentium Pros and Cel 500's.
 

Delorian

Senior member
Mar 10, 2004
590
0
0
Originally posted by: ming2020
Originally posted by: Delorian
for all of you looking to play old abandonware, check out dosbox. It has some incompatibilities but I've found much more of my old games will play than won't.

dosbox rules!

Yeah, it finally got Star Control 2 running with my soundcard though it still stutters intermittently. The free UrQuan Masters is pretty good too but nothing replaces the original. Other titles I'm gonna try out under dosbox include LucasArts' Full Throttle, System Shock I, and Hexen Deathkings mission pack.

Still, there are some titles that just simply require an 286 16MHz at most. Wing Commander I, Ultima VI, and the rest of Origin Systems' CRPG titles (Martian Dreams, Savage Empire, Bad Blood...) come to mind.

Dosbox has a function that can slowdown/speedup games which helps trememendously. I can still get full throttle running on xp/2000 at home though many people I know have a lot of trouble running it on their machines. Wing commander still has some problems on dosbox but still can give you a good taste of what it used to be like . Ultima VI still works on my machine as well!
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |