meloz
Senior member
- Jul 8, 2008
- 320
- 0
- 76
Some amazing performance leaps in this thread.
I once went from a Pentium III (Coppermine, anyone remember?) to Sandy Bridge i3-2100. Being senile I cannot recall the exact MHz of that olde Coppermine P3, but IIRC it was a very weak processor. Around 533 MHz or so, if not lower.
So I used a Pentium three for ten years as my desktop. And it worked, sorta, because I used that PC for browsing, email, programing and gettting my toes wet in the linux world. The system was utterly inadequate for gaming or any 'power' use, but for my limited usage it worked. I should have dumped the P3 system around 2006 but like a masochist kept using it for another four years. I develop some weird sentimental attachment to old hardware which is hard to explain.
Moving to Sandy Bridge was easily my biggest performance upgrade, and also my second biggest tech regret. I had the option to buy i5-2500K and passed on it for a cheap i3 thinking in 12 months or so I will upgrade again, and that would be the time to splurge on a 'big' processor. Why "waste" money on a stopgap Sandy Bridge when Intel are making such fabulous performance leaps....
Four years later, I am still using i3-2100. Sandy Bridge was the last time Intel made a significant improvement in CPU performance. Although the iGPU improvements since are tantalizing, I cannot justify a new build, yet. Maybe Kaby Lake....and that to take advantage of chipset features like Sata Express more than anything else.
I can see this Sandy Bridge with me for another ten years or more. I have come to love it, cannot see myself ever selling it. I will demote it to a test bench or something when I do upgrade in future.
I once went from a Pentium III (Coppermine, anyone remember?) to Sandy Bridge i3-2100. Being senile I cannot recall the exact MHz of that olde Coppermine P3, but IIRC it was a very weak processor. Around 533 MHz or so, if not lower.
So I used a Pentium three for ten years as my desktop. And it worked, sorta, because I used that PC for browsing, email, programing and gettting my toes wet in the linux world. The system was utterly inadequate for gaming or any 'power' use, but for my limited usage it worked. I should have dumped the P3 system around 2006 but like a masochist kept using it for another four years. I develop some weird sentimental attachment to old hardware which is hard to explain.
Moving to Sandy Bridge was easily my biggest performance upgrade, and also my second biggest tech regret. I had the option to buy i5-2500K and passed on it for a cheap i3 thinking in 12 months or so I will upgrade again, and that would be the time to splurge on a 'big' processor. Why "waste" money on a stopgap Sandy Bridge when Intel are making such fabulous performance leaps....
Four years later, I am still using i3-2100. Sandy Bridge was the last time Intel made a significant improvement in CPU performance. Although the iGPU improvements since are tantalizing, I cannot justify a new build, yet. Maybe Kaby Lake....and that to take advantage of chipset features like Sata Express more than anything else.
I can see this Sandy Bridge with me for another ten years or more. I have come to love it, cannot see myself ever selling it. I will demote it to a test bench or something when I do upgrade in future.