Doesn't the OP believe that Clinton has major health issues b/c he's some kind of doctor or something?
i've never said she's unfit to be president because of her health. Matter of fact, I'm calling the public out on ageism, and reinforcing her not being more transparent.
Thanks, though, nice of you captain caveman, really informative post, I ask a reasonable question and get attacked. Fuck off.
You're the one that came here trolling that you're a medical specialist claiming that Clinton had a serious medical conditions as you jumped on that other idiot's bandwagon. And if you call that an attack, you have thinner skin than Trump.
1. ban all guns
2. force gun owners into gayafication camps
3. give all the gunowners homes to syrian terrorists
Would probably get better responses if you changed the question to "presuming Hillary Clinton gets elected, what do you think her #1 priority should be in the beginning of her term"? Forget the 100 days since that's an arbitrary number and realize that most Presidents only have enough political capital for one major initiative, in Obama's case it was Obamacare - I know some will argue for the stimulus too but that was really a continuation of the Bush stimulus measures.
If she is elected, she would be smart to learn how to work with people that do not have your same viewpoint instead of calling them names. If she does she Might Get something done. Nobody wants to work with an asshole that calls you deplorable and other names.
If she is elected, she would be smart to learn how to work with people that do not have your same viewpoint instead of calling them names. If she does she Might Get something done. Nobody wants to work with an asshole that calls you deplorable and other names.
This. When the boss at work gets mean and calls me mean names I take it out on the whole company by doing a shitty job and undermining her and her team at every turn.
I totally agree.If she is elected, she would be smart to learn how to work with people that do not have your same viewpoint instead of calling them names. If she does she Might Get something done. Nobody wants to work with an asshole that calls you deplorable and other names.
If she wanted another $50, she could just give some more speeches.The only thing she'll accomplish is enrich herself another 50 million, or so, by doing what her masters pay her for. Anyone who can't see this shit is blind, dumb, or complicit. Let her get elected and it won't take long to see it. She'll get nothing done in congress, as her hate of republicans will cause nothing but rebellion. The only things that will get done will be by executive order.
She'll get nothing done in congress, as her hate of republicans will cause nothing but rebellion. The only things that will get done will be by executive order.
You guys are just being obtuse.
Maybe. Maybe not. Obama has turned immigration 180 degrees without any input or cooperation from Congress. Hillary will be in at least as strong a position. If the Dems manage to take the Senate too, then by the end of her first term we'll probably be seeing SCOTUS mandates for a lot of the far left ideas, like community standards, the Fairness Doctrine, and imputed income taxation.Depends on turnout and down ballot results.
She will enjoy a strong popular and electoral college lead, but that doesn't necessarily translate into a mandate, especially if turnout is historically low.
If the Dems don't take the Senate, she is essentially politically dead on arrival.
Also depends on what the Republicans learn post Trump
I think that rebellion depends more on its perceived political usefulness than on the actual or perceived hatred from the other side.The only thing she'll accomplish is enrich herself another 50 million, or so, by doing what her masters pay her for. Anyone who can't see this shit is blind, dumb, or complicit. Let her get elected and it won't take long to see it. She'll get nothing done in congress, as her hate of republicans will cause nothing but rebellion. The only things that will get done will be by executive order.
I would say acute, but most CongressCritters are bordering on fugly, so . . .Nah, I think they're being oblique. Can we get a third opinion?
lol "Effective foreign policy" such as more nations locked in bloody civil war, more territory ceded to Communist China, a more resurgent and aggressive Russia, more mortal enemies paid off and appeased to no avail, and more long time allies running away from us?With no majority in either house, I perhaps forsee the Republicans let her renominate Garland and get him through as a measure of contrition for having nominated Donald Trump. Beyond that, the house impeachment machinery will be getting warmed up from November to January ready for her to take office. The next four to eight years will be a total shitshow so long as the GOP holds both houses. See the Benghazi hearings as an example of what to expect stuck on a loop for her entire term(s).
With a Senate majority (or at least a tie), I forsee her getting a SCOTUS judge or two. However, an even bigger issue is that of the judiciary as a whole. Republicans have been dragging their feet for many open federal judge-ships for the past eight years, to the point where a continuation for another four or eight years would put the entire federal court system in jeopardy. I also forsee some effective foreign policy with regards to treaties, etc. moving forward as the House isn't involved in that. Other than that, she will face the same deadlock that hampered Obama for budget issues.
With Democratic control of both houses, I forsee new scotus judges to turn the court to its pre-Thomas/Scalia balance. Obamacare could finally be tweaked to fix its issues, including a public option. The floodgates of progress will finally be unleashed for two years, and she will need to coast on that for another six years like Obama did. GOPers won't let that last long.