- Nov 20, 2005
- 14,612
- 318
- 126
One thing I don't see a lot of people talking about is that there is NO WAY Nvidia can keep going on the current numbering path. In fact I see the opposite, I see people assuming Nvidia will call the GTX 980 replacement the "GTX 1080."
1080 as a number is a loaded term. It is associated with 1080p, which in 2016 translates to "not 4k." Putting out a GTX 980 replacement (that we assume will be sold on the merit of its 4k abilities) called the "1080" seems like the kind of marketing disaster that Nvidia is good at avoiding.
So given that, what will Nvidia call this thing?
My guess is that they stay in the thousands but skip the 1K number (kinda like they did when they went from a Geforce 7900 gtx to the GTX 280). So I am going guess the next line will be 2xxx. Like 2080, 2070, 2060, etc.
What do you think?
1080 as a number is a loaded term. It is associated with 1080p, which in 2016 translates to "not 4k." Putting out a GTX 980 replacement (that we assume will be sold on the merit of its 4k abilities) called the "1080" seems like the kind of marketing disaster that Nvidia is good at avoiding.
So given that, what will Nvidia call this thing?
My guess is that they stay in the thousands but skip the 1K number (kinda like they did when they went from a Geforce 7900 gtx to the GTX 280). So I am going guess the next line will be 2xxx. Like 2080, 2070, 2060, etc.
What do you think?