Unfortunately, RSVandy didn't really tell us why he is considering RAID-0, so we can really only guess as to which would be "faster" for his needs...
Take Photoshop for instance. Here is an example of an application in which a power-user would benefit greatly from RAID-0. Redundancy is not needed, just very high speed storage for temporary (scratch) files. Seek time for this application is negligible: Once the scratch file is opened to disk, the rest of the transformation time (5 minutes or more is not uncommon) in spent in sustained transfer. By striping the data simultaneously over two decent ATA-100 drives, large Photoshop files are now much easier to work with.
For a budding graphic artist, a softRAID with two cheap IDE drives instead of a Seagate Cheetah suddenly looks very attractive.
Maybe if RSVandy can tell us more about his plans for the setup, we can be of more help.