What's the big deal about the Honda S2000?

[Shlong]

Originally posted by: Jellomancer

Originally posted by: Shlong

Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN

Originally posted by: Shlong
When a S2000 rolls by, my friends would mention: hey look, S2000. There is no peep from anyone when a Camaro SS goes by, I find this common in most circles.

and that matters because?

if a Lada rolled by, people would point and say "Hey look, a LADA!".

A Lada in that it's unique, a S2000 in that it's a great car.

No... when I see an S2000 I notice it because it's unique.

I notice it because it's a great car, not quite unique anymore because I see one quite frequently now but I still think great car.

 

[mAdD INDIAN]

Originally posted by: Jellomancer

Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN

Originally posted by: Jellomancer
I love how when a car sucks, messageboard critics place so much value on "interior". You know what? The interior of my 240sx sucks, and I don't give a damn because when I'm in it I drive. I don't sit there and look at the "interior".

Watchu talkin' about Willis?? The interior on the S14 kicks ass. Its functional and looks quite good.
good looking interior

btw, LAUST, Nissan is gonna offer a S/C V8 and a Cummins diesel for the Titan in the next few years.

And about the S2K and Camaro comparision. Both are good cars in their own way. Leave it at that.

Dude... our 240sxes have no cupholders. Wtf is that? I have to put my drinks in the glove compartment or else I can't shift. And the seats suck. My neck hurts after a 150 mile trip .

It's a sports car dammit! We don't need no stinkin' cup holders! I just stopped drinking in the car after I spilled sprite once in the center console. The seats kick ass (for me). I find them really comfortable and supportive.

What are cupholders that roll up in hte window?

And are you guys insinuating the Lada is not a great car?? hmm??

 

[LAUST]

Originally posted by: Jellomancer

Originally posted by: LAUST

Originally posted by: Jellomancer

Dude... our 240sxes have no cupholders. Wtf is that? I have to put my drinks in the glove compartment or else I can't shift. And the seats suck. My neck hurts after a 150 mile trip .

Don't you have those old cup holders that you roll up in the window

No... what are you talking about?
Actually it has what Nissan calls a cupholder... a rectangular box behind the shifter. It works for short drinks, but anything bigger than 5" and it gets in the way so I can't shift.

It was a joke

They were big int he 70's and early 80's... they were just a piece of plastic you bought from places like Kmart and Target for $.29. They had a hook on them that went on the window and you put your drink in em.... Very white trash

 

[mAdD INDIAN]

Originally posted by: LAUST

Originally posted by: Jellomancer

Originally posted by: LAUST

Originally posted by: Jellomancer

Dude... our 240sxes have no cupholders. Wtf is that? I have to put my drinks in the glove compartment or else I can't shift. And the seats suck. My neck hurts after a 150 mile trip .

Don't you have those old cup holders that you roll up in the window

No... what are you talking about?
Actually it has what Nissan calls a cupholder... a rectangular box behind the shifter. It works for short drinks, but anything bigger than 5" and it gets in the way so I can't shift.

It was a joke

They were big int he 70's and early 80's... they were just a piece of plastic you bought from places like Kmart and Target for $.29. They had a hook on them that went on the window and you put your drink in em.... Very white trash

oh ok. thats before my time, that's why i never heard of it.

 

[WinkOsmosis]

So they don't make these window cup holders any more?

 

[mAdD INDIAN]

Originally posted by: Jellomancer
So they don't make these window cup holders any more?

I don't think they'd work in our 240SX since we have frameless doors. The tight rubber sealing wouldn't allow the cupholder's hook to go over the window smoothly withouht disrupting the tight sealing by the rubber.

 

[LAUST]

Originally posted by: Jellomancer
So they don't make these window cup holders any more?

I can't even find a picture on the Internet of em to show you guys :/

 

[Ultima]

Originally posted by: LikeLinus
I think that road and track article about killed this whole SS is better than S2000 argument.

Chevrolet Camaro SS
Price as tested $30,025
Engine type 5.7-liter ohv V-8
Horsepower 325 bhp @ 5200 rpm
Torque 345 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Transmission 6-speed manual
Tires Goodyear F1, 275/40ZR-17
0?60 mph 5.5 sec
Braking 60?0 129 ft
Lap time 2 minutes, 16.46 sec
Slalom 60.0 mph
Skidpad 0.87g

Honda S2000
Price as tested $32,477
Engine type 2.0-liter dohc 16V inline-4
Horsepower 240 bhp @ 8300 rpm
Torque 153 lb-ft @ 7500 rpm
Transmission 6-speed manual
Tires Bridgestone Potenza S-02; 205/55R-16 89W f, 225/50R-16 92W r
0?60 mph 4.9 sec
Braking 60?0 134 ft
Lap time 2 minutes, 17.66 sec
Slalom 65.9 mph
Skidpad 0.90g


S2000 has a quicker 0-60 AND has better Skidpad. It also went through the Slalom at 5.9MPH quicker. The lap times were .8 seconds different (Camaro winning).

The problem is this is against an SS which has more TRQ/HP. So against a Z28, the S2000 wins hands down?

From the same publication, run at the same track on the same day and from the same driver.

Numbers speak for themselves?

You're forgetting that after a few 4.9 second runs in the S2000 the car will be sitting by the side of the road with a fried clutch or worse.

 

[AncientPC]

Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
And I don't care if you can corner twice as fast, that only means you'll hit a deer at twice the speed. Around where I live 90% of corners I take in my Dakota are visibility limited. Do I care about increasing handling when I won't be able to use it? Not really.

That situation applies to you. Perhaps the Camaro is a better suited car for you than the S2000, not everyone lives in your part of the country where all the corners are visibility limited.

Top end horsepower? Who cares if you have to be at 50MPH to feel it, are you gonna downshift to 2nd on the freeway just to feel it? I want it down low where I can feel it from every stop sign, stop light, onramp, and while in 5th. I can feel the torque whenever I want. I got 295LB/ft of it in a smallish truck.

1) Driving style. (Is downshifting too difficult? If so why not just get an auto tranny?)
2) Earlier point proven, once again a domestic driver trying to drive an S2000 like a domestic big block.

"But you can take the S2000 road racing!" Are you GOING to? I can spend $20 and a friday night and go drag racing. I have. Drag racing is quite popular and the torquers almost always kill the twisters. (though the twisters often kill thier half shafts)

An alternative would be autocrossing, which albeit popular, isn't as common as everyone makes it out to be. If it's popular, it must be the best, right? Hey, it's your town -- I don't know what's popular there. Then again, I doubt you could say much about the popularity of drag racing across the US.

By your logic, who in their right mind would buy a lighter, slower car with great handling (i.e. Miata) and even bother "road racing"?

And consider that you really should be comparing the S2000 to the Corvette. They're closer in price and in the same class. Think the S2000 can outrun a car w/ 345HP and possibly BETTER handling?

http://www.chevrolet.com/corvette/index.html
http://www.chevrolet.com/camaro/index.htm

Yes, Corvette's $43k is closer to S2000's $30k pricetag than S2000 is to Z28's $23k or SS's $28k.

Most car buyers today place the priorities as such:
1: Image
2: Cup holder count
3: Rim size
4: Impressive sounding numbers
5: Cup holder size
...
12: Performance

Yes, and since the majority of the car buyers today drive an automatic, let's just assume everyone in America drives automatic.

The Mitsubishi Eclipse is a 3200LB car, but people _THINK_ of it being a small car. The Camero is a 3500LB car but people _THINK_ of it as a big heavy car. Those "little" cars are often not as light as you think. 300LBs won't cover a 100HP deficit unless you're in the 1000HP range.

We're not comparing Eclipses. We're comparing the S2000's 2,809lbs and Camaro's 3,439lbs, and spell the goddamn car name right.

 

[AncientPC]

Originally posted by: Ultima
You're forgetting that after a few 4.9 second runs in the S2000 the car will be sitting by the side of the road with a fried clutch or worse.

If that's the case than my Prelude would've gone through at least a couple of clutches from me launching at 5,000+ rpms and my engine would've at least broke a few rods from shifting at 8,200 rpms, but it hasn't. So my car must be a lemon right?

I've said it once, I've said it a billion times, stop trying to drive small displacement, double cam profile engines (since the word VTEC gets thrown around too much) as though they were big block domestics and expect the same results.

 

[zCypher]

Originally posted by: AncientPC

Originally posted by: LAUST

Originally posted by: sniperruff

i know that GM doesn't make t-birds. i don't care for whether it's GM or ford or whatever. i put them in one big category known as AMERICAN CARS

We put you in one huge catagory known as TROLL

that was mean and uncalled for. ford and GM are both american car companies. now tell me that is wrong

Yes they are both American Cars, which you automatically put into a catagory that ZERO of their vehicles produced are any good. Yes there are MODELS of GM that I do not like and would never own, but there are also models that are superior to import counterparts (Trucks, Vette), I and many others here have the ability to break models down to pro's and con's, Yeah the NSX is nice but how much does it cost? and why does the Z06 automatically handle just okay? From the events I've been to they handle great, the only thing people are doing is replacing the diff and brake fluid with higher grade fluids.

You say "it's what YOU want in a car", but yet all you list is biased opinions and just steriotype every domestic car instantly, hmmm thats funny. Where is the proof that Vette's are only good for pure power?[/quote]

It comes from people who haven't drove a Vette and like to jump on the bandwagon and quote what other people say. Kind of like how domestic drivers try to drive small displacement engines like their domestic, then comment on how little power they have on the low end. That's how the mother f$#@ing car's designed.

All that miles per gallon quote is pure crap too, it all depends on how you drive. When I drive my Prelude up to Dallas / Austin on I-35, I get 28 mpg because I leave it in 5th and stay at 75mph. I know it's possible to get just as high mpg with a Vette driving in low 6th gear most of the way.[/quote]I'm pretty sure edmunds assumes best gas mileage possible for each vehicle so your argument is pretty empty there. Just had to pick on that, it stuck out to me. The numbers are "optimal"... there really isn't anything to argue about my MPG comparison. The S2000 gets 20mpg "optimally driven". You think it'd get 40mpg like a Swift if you drove it softly? No.

 

[Rent]

Originally posted by: AncientPC

Originally posted by: Ultima
You're forgetting that after a few 4.9 second runs in the S2000 the car will be sitting by the side of the road with a fried clutch or worse.

If that's the case than my Prelude would've gone through at least a couple of clutches from me launching at 5,000+ rpms and my engine would've at least broke a few rods from shifting at 8,200 rpms, but it hasn't. So my car must be a lemon right?

I've said it once, I've said it a billion times, stop trying to drive small displacement, double cam profile engines (since the word VTEC gets thrown around too much) as though they were big block domestics and expect the same results.

I've driven both Vette's, Camaros, S2ks, and even Preludes.

The 5k launch you do isn't a dump. You slip break the tires loose and slip it (modulating) for the remainder. My friend who moderates kill stories on PreludeOnline patented it as the "LC" launch.

He still had to replace his stock clutch @ 65k. A lot of S2k owners do as well. You should be more worried about the defects inherent in the Prelude transmission.

 

[AncientPC]

Originally posted by: Rent
The 5k launch you do isn't a dump. You slip break the tires loose and slip it (modulating) for the remainder. My friend who moderates kill stories on PreludeOnline patented it as the "LC" launch.

I'm not referring to the LC launch. Doing a 5k dump will stress the transmission, yes; but it's not as bad as what domestic lovers would like to believe (sort of like how import lovers believe the Corvette can't handle worth bunk).

He still had to replace his stock clutch @ 65k. A lot of S2k owners do as well. You should be more worried about the defects inherent in the Prelude transmission.

Yes, the Prelude inherently has plenty enough of transmission problems that Honda isn't willing to admit. 4-5 grinds and trouble putting it into first when the car's cold are among the top, not to mention the SS's.

And BTW, I do know who 99Prelude_LC is, I grew up in Plano, and yes his launch will kill the clutch. Last I heard he supercharged the Lude. I have the same SN on PO.com as well.

 

[Shrooms420]

just remember when comparing: S2000=4 cylinder Camaro=8 cylinder

any motor will last long even if you push it to its limits!! as long as you take care of the motor and keep up with the services.

 

[LS20]

What's with all the number throwing here? unless you go to the track every weekend or brag on the internet everyday its kinda dumb to pick a car because it puts up better numbers on paper.

ive driven a S2000 and a Z28 and the s2000 was just plain funner to drive to me. The chassis was awesome (and its a convertible!), the braking and steering was so accurate it made for a sublime package. in the s2000, it felt as if i was driving with the car, in the z28, it felt as if the car was driving me.

for day to day driving experience, id derive more pleasure from the s2000. however its all personal preferences.


i know Rent = cooter (LC's friend with a 2dr chevy). who are you , AncientPC? im guessing you go to UT?