Whats the deal with Keith Olbermann?

[Ryan]

Iadmire his ability to articulate beautifully, sometimes he can deliver a good verbal knockout

 

[piasabird]

He is portrayed as a journalist, which is a lie.

 

[daveymark]

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: nick1985
Maybe I didnt explain myself well....

I see that half the people in here are swinging from Olbermann's nuts. I have no problem with liberal shows, heck I find hardball to be quite entertaining and its pretty well known Mathews is a liberal. But Olbermann is a different kind of breed...he foams at the mouth for an hour and comes with with the most un-funny jokes trying to knock down the same conservative people night after night. Does that not get old?

/shrug

No, it never gets old. I don't watch O'Reilly for the same reason you don't like Olbermann. Olbermann appeals to my ideals, O'Reilly doesn't.

The difference is most conservatives in here don't watch O'Reilly. There are plenty of folks here who happily shout from the rooftops that they watch Olbermann

Some of if it may have to do with the fact that the left doesn't have much to choose from when it comes to watching/listening to a show where a liberal gets to opine in an entertaining fashion. Olbermann is pretty much it. Rachel Maddow is a distant second, even though she's only got her radio show(she would be a great TV host) and Bill Maher 3rd

 

[Atreus21]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Yeah he's definitely biased against Bush but then what decent citizen who's pissed at the damage Bush has done to the country whether he be liberal or conservative wouldn't be?

I'm a decent citizen. I'm not pissed.

 

[fskimospy]

Originally posted by: Atreus21

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Yeah he's definitely biased against Bush but then what decent citizen who's pissed at the damage Bush has done to the country whether he be liberal or conservative wouldn't be?

I'm a decent citizen. I'm not pissed.

Red Dawn was a little too broad. There are about 29% of Americans who still like Bush... although finding one with running water, electricity, and apparently internet access is pretty surprising.

 

[FuzzyBee]

Originally posted by: eskimospy

Originally posted by: Atreus21

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Yeah he's definitely biased against Bush but then what decent citizen who's pissed at the damage Bush has done to the country whether he be liberal or conservative wouldn't be?

I'm a decent citizen. I'm not pissed.

Red Dawn was a little too broad. There are about 29% of Americans who still like Bush... although finding one with running water, electricity, and apparently internet access is pretty surprising.

And here I thought these people were Hillary fans. Isn't that what West Virginia taught us?

 

[FuzzyBee]

Originally posted by: nick1985
Maybe I didnt explain myself well....

I see that half the people in here are swinging from Olbermann's nuts. I have no problem with liberal shows, heck I find hardball to be quite entertaining and its pretty well known Mathews is a liberal. But Olbermann is a different kind of breed...he foams at the mouth for an hour and comes with with the most un-funny jokes trying to knock down the same conservative people night after night. Does that not get old?

/shrug

Obviously, it doesn't for the people that idolize him.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: Atreus21

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Yeah he's definitely biased against Bush but then what decent citizen who's pissed at the damage Bush has done to the country whether he be liberal or conservative wouldn't be?

I'm a decent citizen. I'm not pissed.

Well you should be.

 

[Bird222]

Olberman told Bush he should shut the hell up last night. I though he was about to say STFU.

 

[Harvey]

Originally posted by: Atreus21

I'm a decent citizen. I'm not pissed.

Then you haven't been paying attention, which, believe it or not, is one responsibility of a "decent citizen."

Originally posted by: Bird222

Olberman told Bush he should shut the hell up last night. I though he was about to say STFU.

He did. In broadcast lingo, the "F" is silent.

 

[FuzzyBee]

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: Atreus21

I'm a decent citizen. I'm not pissed.

Then you haven't been paying attention, which, believe it or not, is one responisbility of a "decent citizen."

Wow. If people don't agree with you, they're not "decent citizens". That's pathetic, and smacks of the same attitude you like to mock among people you disagree with. Pathetic.

 

[Genx87]

Originally posted by: daveymark

Originally posted by: JD50

Originally posted by: Genx87
Olbermann is another loser leftie who thinks of himself as unique and amusing on the air. At least John Leibowitz can be legitmately funny.

LOL. I see what you did there.

Bwahaha :laugh:

Glad at least two of you understood it

 

[Corn]

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: UberNeuman

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: UberNeuman

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: UberNeuman
I'm looking for discourse - ideas to be shared, even if I agree with them or not.

Much like you were in the Clinton conspiracy thread you ran from? No thanks. I'd rather save the time of having ot spell it all out for you.

You could link to that thread......

but, it doesn't help your case...

No case trying to be made here. Youve already proven you run from threads you cant handle. I'm not wasting my time again. Move along...

The only waste is between your ears...

When all else fails, attack! How old are you? Grow up.

Careful there Corbett or UN will parody you using stock photos of Hervé Villechaize and his l33t photoshop skillz..........

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: FuzzyBee

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: Atreus21

I'm a decent citizen. I'm not pissed.

Then you haven't been paying attention, which, believe it or not, is one responisbility of a "decent citizen."

Wow. If people don't agree with you, they're not "decent citizens". That's pathetic, and smacks of the same attitude you like to mock among people you disagree with. Pathetic.

So you aren't pissed that we are stuck in that quagmire in Iraq or that our debt has skyrocketed under Bush? There are plenty of Republicans who post in this forum that are, at least the real Conservative ones.

 

[FuzzyBee]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: FuzzyBee

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: Atreus21

I'm a decent citizen. I'm not pissed.

Then you haven't been paying attention, which, believe it or not, is one responisbility of a "decent citizen."

Wow. If people don't agree with you, they're not "decent citizens". That's pathetic, and smacks of the same attitude you like to mock among people you disagree with. Pathetic.

So you aren't pissed that we are stuck in that quagmire in Iraq or that our debt has skyrocketed under Bush? There are plenty of Republicans who post in this forum that are, at least the real Conservative ones.

What does it matter if I am or not? That's not the point Harvey was making at all, and you know it.

 

[Bird222]

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: daveymark

Originally posted by: JD50

Originally posted by: Genx87
Olbermann is another loser leftie who thinks of himself as unique and amusing on the air. At least John Leibowitz can be legitmately funny.

LOL. I see what you did there.

Bwahaha :laugh:

Glad at least two of you understood it

Apparently, this is Jon Stewart's real name but I fail to see what the point of using his real name was???

 

[manowar821]

Originally posted by: sprok

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: nick1985
I watch a lot of cable news shows, which means I have also seen my fair share of partisan blowhards. But this guy is truly something special...he can't go two sentences without mentioning at least one of the following:

1) Something negative about Bush
2) Something negative about Bill O'Rielly (Is he pissed he gets trashed in the ratings?)
3) Something negative about Republicans in general.

It means he's got good taste, and he's right. :thumbsup:

I dunno, I kinda wish he wasn't so anti-right. I'm soooo tired of hearing how Bush is some incompetent asshole like if the rest of the country just found out yesterday. There must be something nice to say about the guy; like how he valiantly gave up golf in a sign of solidarity with the troops or whatever.

On another note, I have to wonder what a typical workday must be like for Alan Colmes. I'm honestly curious.

What's wrong with being professionally anti-asshole?

Ignore the morons here who subscribe to authoritarian ideals, saying that there's a liberal bias (whatever the god damn hell that means, are they talking about social liberals, or economic liberals??), they're probably just upset that their predecessors lost the second world war.

 

[Harvey]

Originally posted by: FuzzyBee

Wow. If people don't agree with you, they're not "decent citizens". That's pathetic, and smacks of the same attitude you like to mock among people you disagree with. Pathetic.

No, but your post smacks of you being reading challenged. I said:

1. If you're not pissed at Bush, you haven't been paying attention.

2. Paying attention is one responsiblity of being a "decent citizen."

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: FuzzyBee

So you aren't pissed that we are stuck in that quagmire in Iraq or that our debt has skyrocketed under Bush? There are plenty of Republicans who post in this forum that are, at least the real Conservative ones.

What does it matter if I am or not? That's not the point Harvey was making at all, and you know it.

The point I was making was the same as Red's. What matters is, as of 5/15/08, 4,077 American troops have died in your Traitor In Chief's war of lies, and tens of thousands more are wounded, scarred and disabled for life.

What matters is, in starting their war of lies in Iraq, they took their eye off the real enemy, Al Qaeda, in Afghanistan, the war they were right to pursue, and the war they should have won by now.

What matters is, their war of lies in Iraq has squandered trillions of dollars in current and future debt our great great grandchildren will still be paying long after we're gone from this planet.

What matters is, this administration of traitors, murderers, war criminals, torturers and liars has shredded the rights granted to every American citizen under the U.S. Constitution. :|

What matters is, these same criminals have destroyed our nation's credibility in the world.

By now, the truth of those statements is pretty obvious to the vast majority of American citizens, including real "conservatives" who are appalled by what these criminals have done in our name. If you haven't figured it out, either you haven't been paying attention, or you may be one of the Bushwhacko criminals.

 

[FuzzyBee]

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: FuzzyBee

Wow. If people don't agree with you, they're not "decent citizens". That's pathetic, and smacks of the same attitude you like to mock among people you disagree with. Pathetic.

No, but your post smacks of you being reading challenged. I said:

1. If you're not pissed at Bush, you haven't been paying attention.

2. Paying attention is one responsiblity of being a "decent citizen."

LMAO. I call you on your crap, and I'm "reading challenged." Pathetic.

Do you think that somebody that's *not* pissed at Bush has a chance of being a "decent citizen"?

I'm not going to bother replying to the rest of your cut 'n' pasted diatribe that just serves as attempt to disguise your pompous insult

 

[Harvey]

Originally posted by: FuzzyBee

LMAO. I call you on your crap, and I'm "reading challenged." Pathetic.

Go ahead and call all you want. With your credibility deficit, you'll have to call collect.

You haven't disproven any of the Bushwhackos' crimes I listed. If you're having short term memory problems, I'll list them again:

• As of 5/15/08, 4,077 American troops have died in your Traitor In Chief's war of lies, and tens of thousands more are wounded, scarred and disabled for life.
  
  
• In starting their war of lies in Iraq, they took their eye off the real enemy, Al Qaeda, in Afghanistan, the war they were right to pursue, and the war they should have won by now.
  
• Their war of lies in Iraq has squandered trillions of dollars in current and future debt our great great grandchildren will still be paying long after we're gone from this planet.
  
• This administration of traitors, murderers, war criminals, torturers and liars has shredded the rights granted to every American citizen under the U.S. Constitution. :|
  
• These same criminals have destroyed our nation's credibility in the world.

If you don't comprehend them, then yes, you may be reading challenged. If you do comprehend them, and you can't refute them, you're blowing smoke. I'll leave it to you to make up your own excuses for that.

Do you think that somebody that's *not* pissed at Bush has a chance of being a "decent citizen"?

At this point in history, with so much documentation of the crimes committed by your Traitor In Chief and his gang of traitors, murderers, torturers, war criminals and liars, the answer is, unless you have the IQ of a turnip, probably not.

I'm not going to bother replying to the rest of your cut 'n' pasted diatribe that just serves as attempt to disguise your pompous insult

That's probably the only intelligent thing you've posted in this thread. :laugh:

 

[FuzzyBee]

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: FuzzyBee

LMAO. I call you on your crap, and I'm "reading challenged." Pathetic.

Go ahead and call all you want. With your credibility deficit, you'll have to call collect.

Wow. Start right off with an unbacked petty insult. Nice.

You haven't disproven any of the Bushwhackos' crimes I listed. If you're having short term memory problems, I'll list them again:

• As of 5/15/08, 4,077 American troops have died in your Traitor In Chief's war of lies, and tens of thousands more are wounded, scarred and disabled for life.

• 
  
  Where did I say I would, or, for that matter, where did I say I even disagreed? What does any of this have to do with my assertion that people that may disagree with you can still be "decent citizens"?
  
  

  Blabbering cut 'n' pasted diatribe deleted
  
  If you don't comprehend them, then yes, you may be reading challenged. If you do comprehend them, and you can't refute them, you're blowing smoke. I'll leave it to you to make up your own excuses for that.

  Well, you're the only one I see here that seems to lack the ability to comprehend. If you could comprehend,m you would see that your diatribe is extraneous to the point that I have made repeatedly.
  
  

  Do you think that somebody that's *not* pissed at Bush has a chance of being a "decent citizen"?

  
  At this point in history, with so much documentation of the crimes committed by your Traitor In Chief and his gang of traitors, murderers, torturers, war criminals and liars, the answer is, unless you have the IQ of a turnip, probably not.

  
  Is this a yes or a no?
  

  I'm not going to bother replying to the rest of your cut 'n' pasted diatribe that just serves as attempt to disguise your pompous insult

  
  That's probably the only intelligent thing you've posted in this thread. :laugh:

  
  So - you admit that your diatribe just serves as an attempt to disguise your insult. If it makes you feel better to vomit baseless insults about people on an Internet forum, bully for you.
  

 

[Harvey]

Originally posted by: FuzzyBee

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: FuzzyBee

LMAO. I call you on your crap, and I'm "reading challenged." Pathetic.

Go ahead and call all you want. With your credibility deficit, you'll have to call collect.

Wow. Start right off with an unbacked petty insult. Nice.

Glad you like it. My statement is fully backed by your own display of stupidity.

Originally posted by: FuzzyBee

Originally posted by: Harvey

You haven't disproven any of the Bushwhackos' crimes I listed. If you're having short term memory problems, I'll list them again:

• As of 5/15/08, 4,077 American troops have died in your Traitor In Chief's war of lies, and tens of thousands more are wounded, scarred and disabled for life.

• 
  
  Where did I say I would, or, for that matter, where did I say I even disagreed? What does any of this have to do with my assertion that people that may disagree with you can still be "decent citizens"?

• 
  
  You said, "I call you on your crap..." If you're going to "call me" on my "crap," then you'd better be prepared to prove that what I said was false... Or if you had the slightest whisper of common sense, you may want to consider a large helping of STFU before you embarrass yourself further.
  
  

  Originally posted by: FuzzyBee
  
  

  Originally posted by: Harvey
  
  Repost of documented heinous Bushwhacko crimes deleted
  
  If you don't comprehend them, then yes, you may be reading challenged. If you do comprehend them, and you can't refute them, you're blowing smoke. I'll leave it to you to make up your own excuses for that.

  
  Well, you're the only one I see here that seems to lack the ability to comprehend. If you could comprehend,m you would see that your diatribe is extraneous to the point that I have made repeatedly.

  
  There you go, again, working your ass off to prove you are, in fact, reading challenged. :laugh:
  
  

  Originally posted by: FuzzyBee
  
  Do you think that somebody that's *not* pissed at Bush has a chance of being a "decent citizen"?

  
  

  Originally posted by: Harvey
  
  At this point in history, with so much documentation of the crimes committed by your Traitor In Chief and his gang of traitors, murderers, torturers, war criminals and liars, the answer is, unless you have the IQ of a turnip, probably not.

  
  Is this a yes or a no?

  
  Yes, it is. And you said you weren't going to reply. Why did you lie to us? :laugh:

 

[FuzzyBee]

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: FuzzyBee

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: FuzzyBee

LMAO. I call you on your crap, and I'm "reading challenged." Pathetic.

Go ahead and call all you want. With your credibility deficit, you'll have to call collect.

Wow. Start right off with an unbacked petty insult. Nice.

Glad you like it. My statement is fully backed by your own display of stupidity.

Originally posted by: FuzzyBee

Originally posted by: Harvey

You haven't disproven any of the Bushwhackos' crimes I listed. If you're having short term memory problems, I'll list them again:

• As of 5/15/08, 4,077 American troops have died in your Traitor In Chief's war of lies, and tens of thousands more are wounded, scarred and disabled for life.

• 
  
  Where did I say I would, or, for that matter, where did I say I even disagreed? What does any of this have to do with my assertion that people that may disagree with you can still be "decent citizens"?

• 
  
  You said, "I call you on your crap..." If you're going to "call me" on my "crap," then you'd better be prepared to prove that what I said was false... Or if you had the slightest whisper of common sense, you may want to consider a large helping of STFU before you embarrass yourself further.
  
  

  Originally posted by: FuzzyBee
  
  

  Originally posted by: Harvey
  
  Repost of documented heinous Bushwhacko crimes deleted
  
  If you don't comprehend them, then yes, you may be reading challenged. If you do comprehend them, and you can't refute them, you're blowing smoke. I'll leave it to you to make up your own excuses for that.

  
  Well, you're the only one I see here that seems to lack the ability to comprehend. If you could comprehend,m you would see that your diatribe is extraneous to the point that I have made repeatedly.

  
  There you go, again, working your ass off to prove you are, in fact, reading challenged. :laugh:
  
  

  Originally posted by: FuzzyBee
  
  Do you think that somebody that's *not* pissed at Bush has a chance of being a "decent citizen"?

  
  

  Originally posted by: Harvey
  
  At this point in history, with so much documentation of the crimes committed by your Traitor In Chief and his gang of traitors, murderers, torturers, war criminals and liars, the answer is, unless you have the IQ of a turnip, probably not.

  
  Is this a yes or a no?

  
  Yes, it is. And you said you weren't going to reply. Why did you lie to us? :laugh:

• 
  
  
  
  Please, please, please try to stay on track. *Surely*, a forum member of your standing can do that, right?
  
  1. The "crap" I'm calling you on is you implying that people that disagree with you are not "decent citizens." Your response is that I'm stupid. Nice.
  
  2. Here you go: peeople that disagree with you can be "decent citizens." I guess, though, that anybody that disagrees with you should, in your words "STFU". Nice.
  
  3. Although, I continue to try to get you admit or refute your own statement, you continue with your strawman diatribe, and try to cover it up by questioning my reading ability. Nice.
  
  4. Finally, I ask you to answer the question I've posed (notice I ignored your C&P diatribe once again), and you call me a liar. Nice.
  
  It appears that your MO here is to do nothing but attempt to insult people and spew off-topic hatred.

 

[Harvey]

Originally posted by: FuzzyBee

It appears that your MO here is to do nothing but attempt to insult people and spew off-topic hatred.

Nah. You do a fine job of insulting yourself on your own. :laugh:

 

[umbrella39]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Yeah he's definitely biased against Bush but then what decent citizen who's pissed at the damage Bush has done to the country whether he be liberal or conservative wouldn't be?

Look a few posts above your own for examples.