LOL and your use of the word "sensible" like the media lately when it comes to gun control laws.
Your definition of sensible and my definition are not the same thing here. You are trying to apply an adjective that has no bearing unless a common definition can be applied. What I find sensible is the removal of the 1986 ban and the then we'll discuss thing further.
Sensible gun control laws would be the following:
1) Any law abiding American that can pass a criminal and mental health background check should be allowed to purchase and own any firearm they want (including fully automatic weapons) in their own and on their property as they see fit.
2) Unless taking a handgun to a range or another designated area for safe discharging for the intent of practice/hunting, or to take a firearm to be repaired, or to take a firearm to be sold/traded, or to place the in a personal vehicle. Public carrying of a handgun on a person requires a license. Handgun licenses require full training which would include gun safety, crisis training, and handling training. Reasonable fee for training may be given, but no additional fees to apply for the license may be incurred (ie no "tax" for the license). No fully automatic handguns for conceal carry licenses will be allowed.
3) See #2 for long guns except the license required to conceal carry as long guns aren't allowed for conceal carry protection.
4) Removal of "gun free" zones. If a person is allowed to publicly be in a place legally and they are legally allowed to carry concealed, then they should be able to carry. The exceptions would be:
Private property owners can deny legal handgun carry owners to bring their handguns on to their property
Any public place with an armed protection service in place can asked to check in a concealed carry holder's handgun for the duration that the gun owner is at that public venue.
That would be it. Leave the actual training methods and guidelines for concealed carry licenses up to the state level. To me, that would be sensible.