FrancesBeansRevenge
Platinum Member
- Jun 6, 2001
- 2,181
- 0
- 0
I am just above qualifying as retarded. Which makes me wonder if the test is accurate because I am most certainly retarded. I demand a recount.
At the same time, we compared your answers with others who have taken the test, and according to the sorts of questions you got correct, we can tell your Intellectual Type is a Facts Curator.
The first thing we can tell you about that is you've fed your brain a unique collection of facts and figures over the years. You've got a good hold on words and numbers. But that's just scratching the surface.
Originally posted by: Jellomancer
The test says 138. There were bunk questions in that test though... like the one about the fruit and one of the venn diagram type ones.
At the same time, we compared your answers with others who have taken the test, and according to the sorts of questions you got correct, we can tell your Intellectual Type is a Facts Curator.
The first thing we can tell you about that is you've fed your brain a unique collection of facts and figures over the years. You've got a good hold on words and numbers. But that's just scratching the surface.
If some Wicks are Slicks, and some Slicks are Snicks, then some Wicks are definitely Snicks. The statement is:
I can't answer that question unless I know whether Slicks are a sub category of Wicks or if there are other types of Slicks besides Wicks.
Originally posted by: Dacalo
I believe I got 144 last time I took an IQ test.... but IQ is BS.
No human mind's brilliance can be summed up by one number
Originally posted by: Gonad the Barbarian
127 in my current, quite inebriated state.
I got a 90 by guessing. That is still high enough to make me think the test is crap.Originally posted by: maladroit
I took the test in 30 seconds by going through and clicking random answers.
I got a 115.
This test is garbage.