Me and a friend of mine are having a (friendly) argument about the upcoming Mustang core from AMD.
There is the Corvette variant that is for mobile.
There is a version for high end, the "Athlon Ultra" I believe.
I've read somewhere that the layout of the pieces is optimized so it will use less power or some such thing. Or maybe run at higher clock speeds due to shorter traces or la la la la. But the big question is this:
The Mustang will have versions to replace the Duron and Athlon.
What will a desktop Mustang core have over the Thunderbird core.
Maybe 512k on die cache instead of 256? Perhaps it will be 256bit cache instead of 64? Maybe it's just tweaked for better peformance, but no major differences.
I think that because it's got a version that is targetted at the WS/Server market it will have faster cache.
So I'm guessing for 128 or 256bit bus.
What do you guys think ?
Like I said general speculation welcome
There is the Corvette variant that is for mobile.
There is a version for high end, the "Athlon Ultra" I believe.
I've read somewhere that the layout of the pieces is optimized so it will use less power or some such thing. Or maybe run at higher clock speeds due to shorter traces or la la la la. But the big question is this:
The Mustang will have versions to replace the Duron and Athlon.
What will a desktop Mustang core have over the Thunderbird core.
Maybe 512k on die cache instead of 256? Perhaps it will be 256bit cache instead of 64? Maybe it's just tweaked for better peformance, but no major differences.
I think that because it's got a version that is targetted at the WS/Server market it will have faster cache.
So I'm guessing for 128 or 256bit bus.
What do you guys think ?
Like I said general speculation welcome