B b0mbrman Lifer Jun 1, 2001 29,471 1 81 Apr 17, 2007 #76 Mind you, I'm in pretty good shape, but I don't think I'll ever have lots of definition...genetics or something Oh, I also love booze
Mind you, I'm in pretty good shape, but I don't think I'll ever have lots of definition...genetics or something Oh, I also love booze
T tfinch2 Lifer Feb 3, 2004 22,114 1 0 Apr 17, 2007 #77 34" waist It's flat and a 2-pac, but a little insulated. I need to lose about 5 lbs.
M mobiblu Senior member May 30, 2005 363 0 0 Apr 17, 2007 #78 28" for me. I suspect all the one under 30" are asian.
M manowar821 Diamond Member Mar 1, 2007 6,063 0 0 Apr 17, 2007 #79 Originally posted by: LordNoob 84", 18 pack. I am 9'4", 650 lbs. Who am I? Click to expand... OH OH, I know. Goro?
Originally posted by: LordNoob 84", 18 pack. I am 9'4", 650 lbs. Who am I? Click to expand... OH OH, I know. Goro?
Z Zysoclaplem Diamond Member Sep 26, 2003 8,803 0 0 Apr 17, 2007 #80 28-30 size pants. Depends on the brand. I have never just measured. Where do you measure a man's waist anyway?
28-30 size pants. Depends on the brand. I have never just measured. Where do you measure a man's waist anyway?
K1052 Elite Member Aug 21, 2003 47,323 35,459 136 Apr 17, 2007 #81 Currently 30" and a 2 pack Stopped cardio for a couple months to put on more mass. Going back on now that summer approaches.
Currently 30" and a 2 pack Stopped cardio for a couple months to put on more mass. Going back on now that summer approaches.
JDub02 Diamond Member Sep 27, 2002 6,210 1 0 Apr 17, 2007 #82 36-38 6'3" - 230 I have to lose 20-30 lbs before some packs start showing. Probably won't happen. I don't think I'm genetically inclined to have a BF% that low.
36-38 6'3" - 230 I have to lose 20-30 lbs before some packs start showing. Probably won't happen. I don't think I'm genetically inclined to have a BF% that low.
C Chrono Diamond Member Jan 2, 2001 4,959 0 71 Apr 17, 2007 #85 33" no packs. Just fat oozing all over the place. I'm working on a 6-pack of beer right now.
D DaShen Lifer Dec 1, 2000 10,710 1 0 Apr 17, 2007 #86 2 packs it used to be more defined, but I have let myself go. No time anymore. **EDIT** 33" last time I checked, probably a 34" now. I am 5'11.75" (closer to 5'11" now because of a leg injury)
2 packs it used to be more defined, but I have let myself go. No time anymore. **EDIT** 33" last time I checked, probably a 34" now. I am 5'11.75" (closer to 5'11" now because of a leg injury)