What's your windows experience index?

[ManyBeers]

 

[aigomorla]

Hope you see an ES before summer ^_^

i think the better statement is..

YOU GUYS BETTER HOPE i see an ES b4 summer. :sneaky:

 

[Castiel]

 

[deimos3428]

7.3. My lowly Phenom II 955 is really bringing the number down.

 

[nemesismk2]

AMD Athlon II X2 240 (2.8ghz) with Palit GeForce GTS 450 Sonic scores:-

Processor: 6.2
Memory: 7.0
Graphics: 7.1
Gaming Graphics: 7.1

Don't have time right now but will test my AMD Athlon II X4 645 tomorrow!

 

[996GT2]

7.3. My lowly Phenom II 955 is really bringing the number down.

I think it's strange how there's so much variation in the numbers. MY i5-2500k only gets 7.6 at 4.2 GHz, which isn't far off from the 7.3 you're getting with your Phenom II 955. A Core 2 Quad at 2.5 GHz also gets around 7.3. Someone had a stock i7-2600 get a 7.7.

Most benchmarks would show an overclocked 2500k as being about 2x as fast as a Phenom II 955. I guess Microsoft's rating scale gets VERY nonlinear towards the top end

 

[Golgatha]

7.5
7.6
7.9
7.9
7.9

My computer is in my signature.

 

[mnewsham]

i think the better statement is..

YOU GUYS BETTER HOPE i see an ES b4 summer. :sneaky:

Im sure we all want that.

 

[mv2devnull]

"My windows experience?" wondered a Linux user. "Not as horrid as I'd like it to be.", he answered. Besides, Vista would not go to 7.9 anyway.

 

[Attic]

I'm wondering why the 460 scored lower than expected here from what i've seen in other scores of comparable cards.

 

[podspi]

Getting a 5670 soon to bring things up a bit and then done for a little while, anyway...

 

[mnewsham]

Getting a 5670 soon to bring things up a bit and then done for a little while, anyway...

don't do much gaming do you?

 

[slayernine]

This is the computer in my sig

http://slayernine.com/img/screenshots/WEI_mainsystem2011-01-12.PNG

Had to re-run the assessment as my Intel 160gb only showed as 5.9 at first. I used to run Windows on my Intel 80gb but this week I reinstalled everything.

 

[podspi]

don't do much gaming do you?

Up until now, almost none!


All I want to do is play Starcraft II and the original Bioshock @ 1440x900. From what I've read the 5670 should be enough (please, please correct me if I'm wrong before I spend any money!). The last non-integrated graphics I had was the Abit Siluro Ti4200. Ah, the days...

I also want a decent card to play with OpenCL on. I like threads

 

[mnewsham]

Up until now, almost none!


All I want to do is play Starcraft II and the original Bioshock @ 1440x900. From what I've read the 5670 should be enough (please, please correct me if I'm wrong before I spend any money!). The last non-integrated graphics I had was the Abit Siluro Ti4200. Ah, the days...

I also want a decent card to play with OpenCL on. I like threads

The 5670 I don't think will do SC2 justice.

 

[Wreckage]

I'm still using Vista which I don't think goes above 5.9

 

[nemesismk2]

Just benchmarked my other computer and got:-

AMD Athlon II X4 645 (3.1ghz) with Palit GeForce GTS 450 Sonic scores:-

Processor: 7.3
Memory: 7.3
Graphics: 7.1
Gaming Graphics: 7.1

 

[Rifter]

http://img683.imageshack.us/img683/8221/windowsindex.png


7.7

Specs in sig

damn CPU and SSD slowing me down

 

[pukemon]

The 5670 I don't think will do SC2 justice.

At 1440x900 it should be able to handle High graphics with a fast enough processor and 4GB RAM. I'm able to with an old Geforce 9800GT with a C2D E7400 running completely stock, no OC.

And for the OP, I get 5.9 on all my boxes that use regular ol' hard drive. Interestingly the one machine where I have an Intel X25-V I get 7.8 which is surprising considering it's not exactly the world's fastest SSD.

 

[Daedalus685]

What storage devices do you have to get 7.9?

I'm only at 7.6 with gen 1 vertex in Raid 0... /cry

At any rate:
CPU: 7.4
RAM: 7.4
GPU: 7.9
Gaming GPU: 7.9
Storage: 7.6

This with a q9550 @ 3.6GHz, 6970 @ 950Mhz/1435MHz, and 8GB of Ram @ 1400ish MHz, and 2 OCZ Vertex 120GB in Raid 0

 

[mnewsham]

What storage devices do you have to get 7.9?

I'm only at 7.6 with gen 1 vertex in Raid 0... /cry

At any rate:
CPU: 7.4
RAM: 7.4
GPU: 7.9
Gaming GPU: 7.9
Storage: 7.6

This with a q9550 @ 3.6GHz, 6970 @ 950Mhz/1435MHz, and 8GB of Ram @ 1400ish MHz, and 2 OCZ Vertex 120GB in Raid 0

What is your drives read write speed?

 

[Mr. Pedantic]

CPU: 7.5
RAM: 7.5
GPU: 7.4
Gaming GPU: 7.4
Storage: 7.5

Core i7 920 at 3GHz
DDR3-1333 6GB
HD4870 512MB
60GB OCZ Vertex 2

 

[ther00kie16]

CPU: 5.0 T7200
RAM: 5.0 2GB (would go to 4 but no 64 bit drivers for some laptop components)
GPU: 5.6 go 7600 gt (OCed from 500/600 to 590/735)
G.G: 5.2 Bios lock on GPU speed maybe? Temps are fine but anything over 600 gives video driver error. If anyone knows anything about this, I'd be interested.
HD : 5.5 scorpio blue 160gb (sata 1.5 sadly), looking to either raid or cheap boot SSD in future

GPU at stock speed gave 5.2/4.9 if I recall so pretty balanced laptop overall.

Interesting how the GTS450 Sonic scored higher than 2 people's GTX460

 

[Daedalus685]

What is your drives read write speed?

Writing at 290-300MB/sec and reading at 480-490MB/sec right now.

Edit: Using ATTO, from 16K up, obviously below that is much slower.

 

[mnewsham]

Writing at 290-300MB/sec and reading at 480-490MB/sec right now.

Edit: Using ATTO, from 16K up, obviously below that is much slower.

Does it support TRIM?