thats what that asshat bush did during the final days of the 04 election, threatening that gays will take over if he wasn't reelected.
Right... nor do I accept any religious or spiritual theory about how the universe formed.
Well to be fair, scientists don't accept theories either. They gather evidence and test hypothesis and allow the evidence to lead them to a specific result. A proper scientist will only accept the known and provable portions of a given theory. Such as gravity, scientists accept it exists and it's basic functions, but the why and how are still up for debate. Abiogenesis, evolution, big bang theory are all very similar. There's parts that are known and fully accepted, but there's parts that are still being investigated.
Check my sig for my views on the formation of the universe. Because science works, bitches.
IMO: Being gay is not a minority. It is a genetic defect
I think darwin would agree. Gay folks have fail DNA that eliminates their base instinct that tells them to propagate their DNA through offspring.
Until people start to reproduce from a method other than heterosexual intercourse I'll stick to this opinion.:awe:
Actually the gay guys I know are more interested in having children than most of the straight guys I know.
IVF?
The Canadian education system on display, folks!By that logic its cool if some dude gets married to his dog and pays a woman to host an egg fertilized by his semen.
IVF is just a scientific means around a disability. I feel bad for the gays, they have a disability similar to autistic folks. They lack the ability to reproduce but yet they have great fashion sense (which also does not contribute to survival ability).
I don't hate, I just think of them like a useless appendage or growth on the human race.
By that logic its cool if some dude gets married to his dog and pays a woman to host an egg fertilized by his semen.
IVF is just a scientific means around a disability. I feel bad for the gays, they have a disability similar to autistic folks. They lack the ability to reproduce but yet they have great fashion sense (which also does not contribute to survival ability).
I don't hate, I just think of them like a useless appendage or growth on the human race.
By that logic its cool if some dude gets married to his dog and pays a woman to host an egg fertilized by his semen.
IVF is just a scientific means around a disability. I feel bad for the gays, they have a disability similar to autistic folks. They lack the ability to reproduce but yet they have great fashion sense (which also does not contribute to survival ability).
I don't hate, I just think of them like a useless appendage or growth on the human race.
By that logic its cool if some dude gets married to his dog and pays a woman to host an egg fertilized by his semen.
IVF is just a scientific means around a disability. I feel bad for the gays, they have a disability similar to autistic folks. They lack the ability to reproduce but yet they have great fashion sense (which also does not contribute to survival ability).
I don't hate, I just think of them like a useless appendage or growth on the human race.
The Canadian education system on display, folks!
Actually the gay guys I know are more interested in having children than most of the straight guys I know.
IVF?
They could acquire children, but they cannot have children. They are guys.
It's so cute how you think you're providing a valuable service to the forum!
Since when did procreation require love?
Since when did procreation require love? Are you saying becuase the two don't produce one together via intercourse it doesn't count if they produce a child through another avenue?
Well I think what he means is that they can't biologically reproduce if they only have sexual intercourse with same sex partners, which they can't. It doesn't make gay people useless in a biological sense of helping the species, either, unless you possess a very incomplete and shallow grasp of how biological systems interact.
No.
A dude can't "Have" a child. Gay or otherwise.
What I'm saying is I don't see the point of the argument. If we are arguing nature in it's purest form, procreation for survival of the species, that happens all the time outside of pair bondings. Gays can reproduce like any one else.
Thank you for the wisdom and humor. I normally don't bother with this topic here any more but I liked that "extra" part.What about bisexuals surely they are beyond straights, extra abilities
The Canadian education system on display, folks!
LOL you're hilarious, especially your last sentence. Underlying premise: the sole use of a human being is in producing more human beings. If you don't reproduce, you're useless. Because what the world needs is many, many more people, of course. And because people contribute nothing to human-kind by way of their intellect, industry or creativity, only in the offspring they produce.
Also, you contradicted yourself here, by first saying that hetero intercourse was the only means of reproduction, then acknowledging that gays can do it via artificial insemination. Oops.
The primary biological purpose of humans(or any animal) is to reproduce and propagate their genes. What real purpose do any of us serve, not much of one in the grand scheme of things. Let do the environment a favour and just kill all humans.
LAUNCH THE NUKES JIMMY WE GOTTA SAVE THE PLANET!