Originally posted by: halkebul
SiS's and VIA's dual channel DDR solutions are looking better on paper than granite bay at this time. But granite bay will arrive first.
Originally posted by: fkloster
Originally posted by: halkebul
SiS's and VIA's dual channel DDR solutions are looking better on paper than granite bay at this time. But granite bay will arrive first.
Please elaborate how a sis or via chipset could be 'better' than and Intel chipset?
Originally posted by: fkloster
Sunner, I only reflect on chipsets made for Intel chips by Via and Sis...when Intel chipsets for Intel parts have most always pleased and seem for the most part, trouble free. Via and Sis chipsets for Intel parts are just not up to snuff imho. Not near as stable or level of quality. That is all... i.e. We all know who makes the best chipsets for AMD cpu's.... AMD does. No one makes a better chipset for Intel cpus than Intel. Please correct me if I'm missing something...
better in what way?
Originally posted by: fkloster
fklosters grades for chipsets for Intel cpus...... 1 being lowest 10 being the best:
1) Intel: Price: 4 Stability: 10 Features : 7
2) Sis: Price: 9 Stabiltiy: 7 Features: 9
2) Via: Price: 9 Stability: 6 Features: 8
Via and Sis win total score every time...but I would by the Intel beyond a shadow of a doubt for the stabiltiy
Better on paper. Sis and Via dual DDR P4 chipsets will officially support up to DDR333 while GB up to DDR266