When will we see Fury reviews?

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

desprado

Golden Member
Jul 16, 2013
1,645
0
0
Why? Some sites are so clearly anti-AMD its a waste of $ and time to send them free samples so they can continue their bashing.

All most all website are negative about AMD so tell me which are not?

This is the reason why AMD is near bankruptcy, low share, low DGPU market and non exist in CPU and mobile.

It is sign of Immature and unprofessional management of AMD.Basically AMD has hired fanboys not professional to the their job.
 

guskline

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2006
5,338
476
126
That's exactly what I'm implying. Nvidia lies all the time. They get caught. Yet, their PR team is so good, and their fan base so loyal, they're able to spin it in a way where they'll benefit from it.

I don't know if you remember; but, during the GTX 970 memory fiasco, some people were so upset that they returned the card.......Only to spend even more money on a GTX 980. LOL. That's how Nvidia roll. They're on a whole new level of marketing/PR.

Having said that, I am against cherry picking reviewers. I do, however, understands that this is the nature of the industry. Just don't do it so poorly that it backfires.. AMD, get it together!!

I completely agree. Dr. Su are your reading this?

Have the PR person who did this, call Kitguru, apologize and send them the Fury X. Period. OR don't send out any.

My goodness, whatever goodwill AMD could generate with this launch in the reviewing community could be effectively "gutted" by such a bonehead move.

BTW, Kitguru's positive review of the Sapphire Tri-X R9 290 was one of the primary reasons I eventually bought 3 of those cards!
 

iiiankiii

Senior member
Apr 4, 2008
759
47
91
Why? Some sites are so clearly anti-AMD its a waste of $ and time to send them free samples so they can continue their bashing.

Let me rephrase it. Since review units are limited, I understand that there should be a priority list. Those sites that are lower on the priority list will obviously get the card later, or not at all. The order of priority should be done at AMD's discretion.
 

desprado

Golden Member
Jul 16, 2013
1,645
0
0
I completely agree. Dr. Su are your reading this?

Have the PR person who did this, call Kitguru, apologize and send them the Fury X. Period. OR don't send out any.

My goodness, whatever goodwill AMD could generate with this launch in the reviewing community could be effectively "gutted" by such a bonehead move.

BTW, Kitguru's positive review of the Sapphire Tri-X R9 290 was one of the primary reasons I eventually bought 3 of those cards!

This.........if AMD cannot do this than of course Fury X will be a fail launch because people trust 3rd Party review not immature AMD PR.
 

sze5003

Lifer
Aug 18, 2012
14,184
626
126
Has this been posted before ??

Yea in the other thread. People were saying its not accurate because there is no AA but take in consideration these are suppose to be 4k bench results. You really would not need much AA at all with 4k. So for 1080 or 1440 these benches would probably score higher. Gotta wait until next week to verify.
 
Feb 19, 2009
10,457
10
76
Let me rephrase it. Since review units are limited, I understand that there should be a priority list. Those sites that are lower on the priority list will obviously get the card later, or not at all. The order of priority should be done at AMD's discretion.

Yup, exactly this.

The question is why the marketing person at AMD is so bad at his job that he would tell KitGuru (not a biased site at all!) they don't get Fury X for "negative content".

A good PR person would have said "we just don't have enough samples to go around, sorry!"

So, that's one head that should roll immediately and a full official apology to KitGuru be made public, clearly it was a misunderstanding and someone not doing their job right.
 

guskline

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2006
5,338
476
126
Yup, exactly this.

The question is why the marketing person at AMD is so bad at his job that he would tell KitGuru (not a biased site at all!) they don't get Fury X for "negative content".

A good PR person would have said "we just don't have enough samples to go around, sorry!"

So, that's one head that should roll immediately and a full official apology to KitGuru be made public, clearly it was a misunderstanding and someone not doing their job right.
Completely agree.
 

Skurge

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2009
5,195
1
71
Yes this PR Slide of AMD has been posted already.

It's a reviewers guide, not a PR slide. It used to compare reviewers results with AMD's internal results. If there is a large difference then it needs to be investigated.
 

Dave2150

Senior member
Jan 20, 2015
639
178
116
If those are accurate, is the R9 Fury X matching the 295X2 and other 290X Crossfire setups?

I have 2x 290X Lightnings, and if I can get the same performance without having to pay much more after selling off the current cards, with none of the multi-GPU scaling issues and waiting for game/driver support, then I'll be making every effort to make that switch.

290X resale value already plummeted and will take a further hit once Fury launches. We're talking £100-£120 second hand price once fury launches.
 

digitaldurandal

Golden Member
Dec 3, 2009
1,828
0
76
It's [H]. The crowd here either hates them or loves them depending on each and every individual review. They're either great at testing realistic situations or they're crappy because their particular card doesn't overclock well or their gaming experience opinion doesn't coincide with the beliefs of various flock. Right now since Nvidia is currently owning the high end market and is getting generally great reviews, they're hated around here. Lets see what happens to everyone's opinion about [H] when Fury reviews hit.

I love their testing style and used to swear by them. However most people's complaint is not their style or the cards they use, it is the games they are using. They are using all Gamesworks games at this point.
 

zagitta

Member
Sep 11, 2012
27
0
0

Fox5

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
5,957
7
81
Has this been posted before ??


So I see 2-4 games I would run at 4k, and the rest I would have to drop settings on.
Unfortunately, console ports are too demanding, jump from 30fps to 60fps and now the game requires an r9 290/gtx 970, then jump from medium settings to high settings and you need two of them (or possibly fury x). And this is still at 1080p.
 

tential

Diamond Member
May 13, 2008
7,355
642
121
I don't think hardocp is biased as much as the standards they have. I've seen them say games unplayable because of dips below like 45 fps.

I think they mean over 3 year of ownership or so 6fb of vram is safer than 4gb
 

garagisti

Senior member
Aug 7, 2007
592
7
81
I don't think hardocp is biased as much as the standards they have. I've seen them say games unplayable because of dips below like 45 fps.

I think they mean over 3 year of ownership or so 6fb of vram is safer than 4gb

Didn't original Titan launch with 6gb? Would you like to compare notes with where 290 was at launch compared to that, and is now?
 

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,172
3,868
136
Yup, exactly this.

The question is why the marketing person at AMD is so bad at his job that he would tell KitGuru (not a biased site at all!) they don't get Fury X for "negative content".

A good PR person would have said "we just don't have enough samples to go around, sorry!"

So, that's one head that should roll immediately and a full official apology to KitGuru be made public, clearly it was a misunderstanding and someone not doing their job right.

What is sure is that AMD are shooting themselves in the foot by supplying gear to shill sites, although i dont know for Kitguru since i get there only by accident generaly...

A safe marketing would be to send absolutely nothing to sites that did practice a double standard with FCAT, i think that it would be extremely fair from AMD part and couldnt be branded as biased, as well as getting rid of sites like Hardawre.fr for some times since they litteraly crushed AMD s GPU sales in France last year with a trolled review, that is a good review technicaly speaking but with conveniently inflated TDP metrics used only for AMD cards and never for the competition...
 

xthetenth

Golden Member
Oct 14, 2014
1,800
529
106
Btw, Guru3d complaint they didn't get an invite to NV's conferences and paid trips because they were one of the few to keep on using FCAT during the 970/980 release showing poor SLI stutters. They aren't hypocrites, they keep on using the tool good or bad.

Do you have a link to that by the way? I'd love to see more detail on that.
 
Feb 19, 2009
10,457
10
76
Probably videos like this are why AMD pulled the review card from Kitguru. I have noticed subtle bias from Kitguru towards Nvidia, but they're not terrible most of the time. This video however is a bit too much from them. He shuts AMD down for 13 minutes straight and that would probably ruffle me a bit if I worked for AMD.

Ahh okay that makes a ton of sense. I read their articles from time to time, did not notice the bias, but this video is .

Looks like someone at KitGuru has an vendetta and pissed off AMD, now they don't get their shiny Fury X, they go public with private exchanges, real nice gentlemen!
 

Creig

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,171
13
81
All most all website are negative about AMD so tell me which are not?

This is the reason why AMD is near bankruptcy, low share, low DGPU market and non exist in CPU and mobile.

It is sign of Immature and unprofessional management of AMD.Basically AMD has hired fanboys not professional to the their job.
Ah yes, it's so much better when the PR division from a company like Nvidia lies about the actual specs of a product (GTX 970) for four months. So professional!
 

Greenlepricon

Senior member
Aug 1, 2012
468
0
0
Ahh okay that makes a ton of sense. I read their articles from time to time, did not notice the bias, but this video is .

Looks like someone at KitGuru has an vendetta and pissed off AMD, now they don't get their shiny Fury X, they go public with private exchanges, real nice gentlemen!

That's why some journalists definitely should keep their opinions private until they have a good reason to reveal them! Honestly most of KitGuru is fine and I haven't found any problems with them other than some recommendations. Their benchmarks have generally been ok and that's usually what matters. However, saying AMD is entirely for low end and calling them con artists is an entirely different story.
 

gorion

Member
Feb 1, 2005
146
0
71
Yup, exactly this.

The question is why the marketing person at AMD is so bad at his job that he would tell KitGuru (not a biased site at all!) they don't get Fury X for "negative content".

A good PR person would have said "we just don't have enough samples to go around, sorry!"

So, that's one head that should roll immediately and a full official apology to KitGuru be made public, clearly it was a misunderstanding and someone not doing their job right.

This was exactly my thought when I read the news.

Which sane PR person would tell the website that they are being discarded for their content? PR people should be great in coming up with at least 3 different and credible excuses for any need.

Now AMD should really say goodbye to this employee and send the card to KitGuru.
 

Creig

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,171
13
81
This was exactly my thought when I read the news.

Which sane PR person would tell the website that they are being discarded for their content? PR people should be great in coming up with at least 3 different and credible excuses for any need.

Now AMD should really say goodbye to this employee and send the card to KitGuru.
Did you watch that that KitGuru youtube video? I completely understand AMD's decision after suffering through listening to that idiot.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |