Really ?? I have found 90% of what he said just fine.
Umm...no it wasn't. So many errors. Consoles are limited to 720P? Wrong. AMD using HBM to save power to divert it towards a GPU to make the GPU faster by re-allocating the power reserve from memory power usage saved to the GPU - he spun this as bad. Wrong move; that's a great way to increase perf/watt of the entire product. He said all R9 200 products are HD7000 re-badges. R9 260X/290/290X/295x2 are rebadges now? Wrong. He said R9 300 series are going to be 100% R9 200 re-badges. Wrong, 390/390X are
refreshes like 680->770 was. If you want to call a product with higher GPU/memory clocks and double the VRAM a re-badge but praised 770 2-4GB cards, then you basically get what you deserve as a journalist for having double standards. You either rip all refreshes/rebadges equally or you talk about both positive
and negative aspects of these new products in an objective manner. His rant made it sound like NV didn't refresh/re-badge anything ever. LOL worthy.
He said HD7000 products are 4 years old, but no HD7700-7900 cards were ever for sale in 2011. Specifically he mentioned lower-end HD7700-7800 series that came out in 2011. Wrong, they launched in 2012 or 3 years ago, not 4. He said none of AMD's R9 200 series were competitive with NV's GPUs today - that's 100% wrong unless he is blind/biased. Are you agreeing that R9 270/270X were not worth buying over 750/750Ti for gaming despite being 30-45% faster? Are you agreeing with him that R9 280X/290 wasn't a better buy over a 960 for gaming? Are you agreeing with him that R9 290's price/performance vs. 970 is irrelevant? Are you agreeing with him that R9 295X2 wasn't worth buying over a 980 for a very similar price, if someone wanted gaming performance over power draw?
He also ripped apart all of AMD's CPU products, that includes APUs on the PC and he ripped AMD for being cheap but then he hoped Fiji would be cheaper than a 980 (not 980Ti). You might want to watch the video again. He also made an eroneous connection about how outdated the current console tech is and why as a result he doesn't see AMD having any future GPU tech that's going to impress, which is why half the time he spent comparing 980 non-Ti to Fiji. So much negative sentiment.
The unfair reviewers will simply look bad.
Are you kidding? If that were true, sites like PCPer or Legit Reviews would have been bankrupt already and have no readership. That's not how it works. The guy from KitGuru openly started saying if you have to explain something, you aren't winning. If I am a marketing manager from AMD, I am thinking wow, so this guy is going to bury our card right away because 6GB of VRAM > 4GB because he doesn't even want to bother explaining to his reader than you can't directly compare HBM to GDDR5 like that. They probably also feared such a reviewer would spin reference water-cooling as 'required' and how AMD is 'desperate' to use WC to compete.