Good Evening to Messrs CD & SSK.
You are both quite right. The settings that I suggested to CD were a starting point that I believed his rig would tolerate at 3.00 GHz with no operational problems. Since he can tweak his memory to tighter specs (as I mentioned that I thought it might), and so long as it is stable, then that's what I'd maintain, as long as he can also keep the 334x9 settings as well.
If all that works, then I'd stick with that until Gigabyte has some effective surgery for their damn near fatal case of "Inverted-Cranial-Rectal Syndrome", a/k/a "Ocular Rectitus!" I share your mutual amazement that an alleged, world-class motherboard manufacturer like Gigabyte would release a bug-ladened BIOS like the present "Final F4," knowing it will NOT support a 1333 FSB for a Quad-Core, and also won't do a simple thing like SHUTDOWN reliably. That is utterly indescribable in decent terms.
The JERKS at Gigabyte who did that ought to be shown the door, along with the ones who decided to release a Rev. 2 of the board and didn't even bother to tell their USA office and colleagues that such a newer revision was even in the works, let alone about to be released. I'm sure you all sensed the utter frustration in Gary's recent comments when he was caught absolutely flat-footed by that news. As I expressed privately to Gary in a recent PM, the whole manner in which Gigabyte has handled this situation was extremely arrogant.
Quite frankly, if the Rev. 1 board can't live up to it's advertised specs, then maybe a class-action lawsuit against Gigabyte would be in order. That's just a thought for now, but it could become a reality if they don't fix this stuff right the next time. I would suspect that such a lawsuit would get their collective panties bunched up damn quick! Enough is Enough already!
Have a nice evening. TheBeagle