sure, I'll take official Chinese news channel's word on China's Human Rights record...
The video is not from "official Chinese news channel". It's an independent journalist, Max Blumenthal from the Gray Zone. they are using his footage.
Amnesty international
NPR's Ailsa Chang speaks with Jonathan Loeb, a senior crisis adviser and the lead author of Amnesty International's new report on the persecution of Uyghurs and other minority groups in Xinjiang.
www.npr.org
Human Rights Watch
The 53-page report, “‘Break Their Lineage, Break Their Roots’: China’s Crimes against Humanity Targeting Uyghurs and Other Turkic Muslims,” authored with assistance from Stanford Law School’s Human Rights & Conflict Resolution Clinic, draws on newly available information from Chinese government...
www.hrw.org
Human Rights Watch is an extension of US state foreign policy masquerading as in independent NGO.
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2014/06/human-rights-watchs-revolving-door/
From Cuba to Ecuador to Syria to
Ethiopia, HRW’s edicts and positions have often been suspiciously in line with US policy.
So much for defending human rights. And isn't it ironic that Saudi Arabia, a country that's actually genociding Yemeni's, are a US ally?
French investigation of fashion houses
suspected of profitting from forced Uyghur labour
Uniqlo France among four firms suspected of profiting from crimes against humanity in Xinjiang
www.theguardian.com
You have the keyword in your very sentence. Suspected.
And it's as if you didn't even read your article. No one has proven forced Uighur labor.
"SMCP also said it would cooperate with French authorities but would prove the allegations false.
The Tokyo-based Fast Retailing said it had not yet been been contacted by French authorities but would cooperate fully “to reaffirm there is no forced labour in our supply chains”, while Skechers told Reuters it did not comment on pending litigation."
Skechers statement:
https://about.skechers.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/SKECHERS-USA-STATEMENT-UYGHURS-March-2021.pdf
Why would China need to force Uighurs to work the cotton fields when machinery (ask John Deere how much equipment they sold specifically to the Xinjiang region) does the same work so much faster.
BBC articles
China has been accused by the US of genocide and crimes against humanity against the Muslim minority group.
www.bbc.com
Uyghurs abroad describe a pattern of harassment and intimidation they say is designed to silence them.
www.bbc.com
You are not claiming those are CIA outfits as well are you? Or is it just the 2M number you object to?
Not all, but many if not most.
Ever heard of AP, or Reuters? The agencies where almost all other media companies get their info from? Their primary source is the CIA.
It is one of the most important aspects of our media system – and yet hardly known to the public: most of the international news coverage in Western media is provided by only three global new…
swprs.org
A December 26, 1977,
investigative report in the
New York Times described the scope of the CIA’s global campaign to influence opinion through media manipulation. “In its persistent efforts to shape world opinion, the C.I.A. has been able to call upon” an extensive network “of newspapers, news services, magazines, publishing houses, broadcasting stations and other entities over which it has at various limes had some control. A decade ago, when the agency’s communications empire was at its peak, [it] embraced more than 500 news and public information organizations and individuals. According to one CIA official, they ranged in importance ‘from Radio Free Europe to a third‐string guy in Quito who could get something in the local paper.’” The CIA funded those foreign “journalistic assets” generously.
Journalistic assets were useful in many ways. “In the field, journalists were used to help recruit and handle foreigners as agents; to acquire and evaluate information, and to plant false information with officials of foreign governments. Many signed secrecy agreements,” Bernstein wrote.
Bernstein pretty much corroborates what CIA whistleblower John Stockwell tells us in this interview.
And yes, I do object to the claim of 2M genocided. Please provide a source that definitively states how they came to that number.
That wiki has tons of references.
Point me to a specific one and I'll try to find a different source that debunks it, or at least provides an alternative perspective.
ask yourself these key questions.
1. Where do you get your information about China from?
I'm going to assume from US media, unless you've lived in China, or are fluent in Chinese.
2. Have US media and politicians intentionally lied before?
3. Does the US have a record of interfering in other countries, lead coups and color revolutions around the globe?
4. Does the US have a vested interest in demonizing other nations such as Russia and China?
(hint: they do -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVmliB0rVIo)
5. Have you ever been presented the other side of the story, or do you only consume (and blindly believe) US based media?
I'm not saying China is squeaky clean when it comes to this islam extremism issue. they're dealing with it via re-education camps, which IMO is far more humane than the US method of drone strike bombing and killing 1-4M brown people in the mid east over the past 2 decades. Agree?
Oh, and Merry Xmas