Originally posted by: ToeJam13
My issue is when a fringe religion becomes more of a club than a spiritual faith.
No the problem is you have your perceptions backwards, all fringe religions start off as more of a club and build their way
into spiritual faith by gathering followers and influence.
Who says that the
Cult of the Cow is any less of a religion than
Wicca?
Without delving too deep into it, The Cult of the Cow is viewed by most as a parody of regular religous practice, which does
not give lifetime spiritual, moral and ethical advice.
While Wicca is built upon a foundation of various pagan practices that trace their origin to tribal rituals from the early ages
of civilization, and (as some claim) may even pre-date christianity in the bulk of its creation. Wicca also attempts to provide
lessong to guide thier believers on a spiritual, moral and ethical lifestyle, but one that does not share all the same concepts
as other established religions.
Granted, there are also people who claim to be pagan or Wiccan, but seem to be using it more as a statement against
established religion than as an actual practice of personal belief.
What if I were to start the Zionists Church of Cannabis Creationism, in which members must be under the influence of marijuana in order to truly understand the word of God?
You mean like
Rastafarianism? You could try that, but you would need
to be able to provide evidence of more to your beliefs that just an excuse to smoke a bowl. It might help to have
an encyclopedia entry that explains where your church got its start, and what its common beliefs and practices are.
Modern religions are becoming more and more outlandish and unbelievable.
As compared to what? The ancient Greeks and Romans? The Norse? Or maybe the Eqyptians, who had to fend off a cult
of thier own, when on of the Pharoahs (Ankhenaten) turned away from the common belief in people with the heads of
animals as the real gods of Egypt, and starting teaching a belief that there is only one true god who exists above all
things high in the sky.
I mean we have religions that believe that
we?re descended from aliens
And we have had religions that believe god meant us to reject the benefits of modern science (Amish) and medicine
(Christian Scientist). (I won't even touch Catholicism).
Of course the moonies seem kinda whacky on the surface, but they might equally argue that they are just taking the
"sanctity of marriage" to its logical end.
Who's decision is it to say when an organization or group establishment becomes a religion?
That's a very good question, and it is one that even the Founding Fathers did not have a good answer to. Which is
why they tried to create a system that would be open to the possibility that other religions were equally valid along
with the teachings of the Church of England.