- Jul 2, 2006
- 5,595
- 1
- 76
They're less than a year old. How long have you been there?
What's less than a year old? We've been in this house for 9 months
They're less than a year old. How long have you been there?
..What's less than a year old? We've been in this house for 9 months
Tango, the only relevant info here is
He signed the back of the check.
End of story. If he lost it after that, that's his problem. After all the shit he's put your through, I'd tell him to take a hike. He lied about receiving the check, and he's a shitty LL.
As for Alky's idea that you are somehow still liable for paying this man, again...
Ok, so there are 3 banks involved - Citi (mine), HSBC (his) and Chase (???). Should I call Chase and tell them that a check I wrote to someone got deposited into a account that is not his? That really sounds like something the LL should be doing, right??
How is this a question, ask the LL to do all the work.
^ Truth. I'd ignore him.
You really believe is a person lost a check you gave them, you are no longer responsible for payment?JDawg said:^ Truth. I'd ignore him.Lifted said:He signed the back of the check.
Good luck with that.
Lawlz.
100% ignore acknowledgment of receipt of check and proof of endorsement for the troll.
Keep'm coming, your constant thoughtless fail is keeping this thread squarely inside "lawlzy".
Like I said, good luck if it ended up in a court room.
Like the idiots that think a $1000 mis-directed deposit is their's because it was in their accounts. People argue that all the time.
"So that solves the question as to if his wife cashed the check. She did not."
You caught him in a lie on page one. Why do you believe anything this guy says?
Well, I have him in writing that he has no knowledge of anyone he knows that could have deposited the check. After he fills out the police paperwork and the bank does the investigation if it turns out that it was any of those people listed he will have some legal issues to deal with.
We were bored.:|I'm not sure why there is so much argument on responsibility of the check. Tango provided the check to the land lord, which was verified, and therefore he has fulfilled his obligation. After the land lord received the check and signed it, the check became bearer paper and whoever holds it has the right to it. It sounds like they signed it, lost it (which is mind blowingly stupid. never presign your checks before deposit) and someone found it and deposited it in their own account.
I'm not sure why there is so much argument on responsibility of the check. Tango provided the check to the land lord, which was verified, and therefore he has fulfilled his obligation. After the land lord received the check and signed it, the check became bearer paper and whoever holds it has the right to it. It sounds like they signed it, lost it (which is mind blowingly stupid. never presign your checks before deposit) and someone found it and deposited it in their own account.
Wow, these follow up messages are great
Me: Life Lock is $275, Identity Guard is $225 and Identity Force is $225. Let me know what you want to do.
LL: K let me look into. Life lock is $110 for the year. There premium service is $275 which gives you daily access to your credit score. This person does not have your social security # to open credit in your name. You will still be guaranteed up to $1,000,000 in protection.
Me: The regular lifelock service will not alert me if new checking or savings accounts are opened. It also scans for changes to contact info on existing checking and savings accounts. Sorry I will need the ultimate service
LL: And lifelong will reimburse you for any damages suffered. Bank accounts cannot be opened without social security number.
Me: http://www.fairloanrate.com/2009/03...k-account-without-social-security-number-ssn/
Me: Seems like you can
LL: I don't know what that is supposed to say. I'll pay for the $110 one. It protects you against any damages. That is the point. I am not paying so you can monitor your credit
Me: The ultimate service will scan for changes to contact info on existing checking and savings accounts. The $110 service will not. Since you are familiar with the lingo you can look this one up. Under the Code of Federal Regulations, under Title 26 CFR 301.6109-1 (c), banks are not legally required to acquire SSNs from all their applicants.
This is exactly the case. I have 2 sources (bank, police) telling me that my obligation to the LL has been satisfied. What we are doing right now is recovery of the funds which is NOT my obligation.
I made a request to the LL to compensate me for my time wasted and any future help. He is now trying to bargain and make counter offers with me. At this point I really don't care what he decides. He can find his own way to recover his money or he can compensate me, save time, aggravation and get his money back fast.
I'm starting to think that you want to keep doing the leg work for him so as to give you more leverage for compensation.
BTW, I know having sensitive information stolen sucks, but if you think about it, how many thousands of people have that same info? Any time you use a check, who knows how many people could copy down your name, address, bank #/routing #.
What you should do is just forget any compensation and just cut off all communication about this matter with him. The next time he will get a check from you is when you pay for April's rent.
What you should do is just forget any compensation and just cut off all communication about this matter with him. The next time he will get a check from you is when you pay for April's rent.
i agree.
Also make sure you hit the memo line as saying "april's rent"..witch you should be doing anyway.
also did i mention moving the fuck out ASAP? lol