Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Well duh the RE92 sucks. You're not going to find any tire with a tread pattern like that without it sucking. The RE910 is an amazing tire, did wonders for my old Accord in the wet and the snow. I'm currently running RE950s on my 924S and they have been simply amazing. The tread pattern on the RE92 is obviously not a performance tread pattern, anyone buying it expecting a great performance tire is deluded. It's an OE all-season design used on the Toyota Camry for heaven's sake.
If you want good tires, you absolutely cannot buy a tire that is "all-season". I stick with 3-season tires and change over to dedicated snow tires in the winter. I've had all kinds of tire brands, Bridgestone and Firestone have consistantly given me the best wear and best performance.
You can't blame the whole company because of a poor class choice on your part. If you want performance tires, don't buy all-season tires. As for Firestone having quality problems, I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. If you're trying to link it up with that media-invented Explorer fiction, I will remind you that there are precisely _zero_ instances of a properly-inflated and non-overloaded Firestone Wilderness AT tire having any problem. All of the blowouts were caused by operator neglect, either through a failure to keep the tires up to pressure (_all_ tires lose pressure over time and should be checked weekly and inflated as per the sticker on the car's doorjam) or a failure to observe the loading guidlines.
ZV[/quote]
The RE92s are OEM tires on my car (a 2001 Maxima SE with 5-spd), and I certainly didn't choose them. That said, I have driven a similar Maxima SE with the Pilot Sport A/Ss, also all-season tires, and it was an amazing transformation.
Firestone admitted in 2001 that its own design and manufacturing processes had problems, particularly with the tires made in Decatur, IL (hence their massive recall in 2000 and "Making It Right" ad campaign). The NHTSA also found that the Wilderness tires made before 1998 were defective.
I don't mean to paint with too broad a brush - I don't have any reason to believe that Bridgestone/Firestone tires are defective or dangerous on the whole (though between their tremendous struggles in the 70s and their recent problems, they don't inspire tremendous confidence in me), and I don't doubt that they make some great stuff. That said, I am not impressed that they put Michelin's level of money and emphasis into their engineering. I think there are lots of good tires and bad tires (relatively speaking) by all makers, and if you have tires you are satisfied with, that's great.