Which is better?????

[BlackJack21]

Which would you choose?
A K6-3+ 450 running smoothly at 600Mhz at 2.3v (6x100)
or
A K6-3+ 450 running smoothly at 560Mhz at 2.1v (5.5x112)

The difference; one has a 7% increase in cpu clock speed, the other has a 12% increase in bus speed. Which one would you choose?

I was thinking that 600Mhz would be better, coz I has to have my L3 cache DISabled anyway to get the chip running. So the bus bandwith advantage should be minimal.
I tried 616Mhz (5.5x112) but couldn't get it stable, even at 2.6v!! The default voltage is 2.0v.

Any suggestion or help would be great! Thanks!!

 

[koldklock]

Go with 6x100.

 

[jinsonxu]

Wow! Could you run RC5 on that 600Mhz K6III? Since it's only testing the integer performance, i'm interested to see how it stacks up against the Duron!

 

[Tetsuo316]

i'd say the 560 would be faster since overall bus is increased. try benchmarking winbench or quake3 or something to see some results.

 

[Viperoni]

I'd personally go for the bus speed.
it'll make more of a difference than speed.

 

[Teatowel]

I had my old K6-III 450 overclocked..the increase in bus speed made negligible difference.

 

[Train]

try the faster with RC5 for a good 24 hours, if its still stable, your good to go.

 

[BlackJack21]

Thanks you all for the comments.

I'd say that I go with the 600Mhz (6x100) .. I read a few past K6-3 articles and it seems that the bus speed has negligible increase in performance since the K6-3 has its L2 at full speed.
What sucks is my L3 .. I had to disable it in order for my K6-3+ to run. I'm using a FIC PA-2013 ver2.0

Does anybody know about this L3 issue?

Has anybody got their K6-3+ 450 to run at 616Mhz or above?