- Feb 6, 2002
- 36,289
- 28,144
- 136
Not shocking Fox needs to keep that racist base in lineFox is running with the bused in counter protesters big time, it's their talking point.
Not shocking Fox needs to keep that racist base in lineFox is running with the bused in counter protesters big time, it's their talking point.
Er, no.
There's a difference between occasional radicals and organized, large-scale radical movements. You don't see extreme elements of BLM holding massive protests demanding the deaths of police; you do see those protests from neo-Nazis.
And you see, BLM at large condemns extremists when they pop up within its ranks. I don't see you condemning these neo-Nazis at all; you're practically cheering them on. You're a spineless coward who sees overt racism and tries to excuse it rather than fight it like a decent human being.
Lol.....seriously?Part of the problem is that if these people had respectable jobs they wouldn't be marching to begin with.
Along with White House support. Everyone feel proud yet??Well the right is now their champion. Congrats.
Shit, the white house is probably scoping out some new hire material.Along with White House support. Everyone feel proud yet??
Lol.....seriously?
There's plenty of respectable jobs with the ability to work in their white supremecy
I heard White Hoods R Us is hiringLol.....seriously?
There's plenty of respectable jobs with the ability to work in their white supremecy
I wonder if spidey07 is there?
Lol, just highlighting the difference in police treatment of minorities verse whites.I just saw Jack Kingston on CNN make the argument that "These protestors are bad, but they're not as bad as BLM. From what I understand, there has only been one person arrested! BLM protestors were so violent, hundreds of them were arrested. Why are we getting all spun up about these protests when only a single person has been arrested? If they were acting so badly, surely the police would intervene"
Flawless logic there, eh? I can't see any flaws in it.
Surely the police will intervene when it becomes truly violent. Surely.
Old member, racist nutjob, strong affinity for the shoot first ask later stand your ground motto.who is this? I see him mentioned here, but never have heard of him.
Old member, racist nutjob, strong affinity for the shoot first ask later stand your ground motto.
Yea, nothing like a full on superiority complex to keep the party bumpin'Sounds like a fun guy.
Sounds like a fun guy.
Yes but respectable people with respectable jobs don't tend to march as Nazis, regardless of whether or not they have Saturday off.Don't respectable jobs offer time off on Saturday?
You're right. Removing symbols of the people who fought and died to continue the oppression of entire races in no way would help bring unity. That's what divides us. Removing them.
I am a spineless coward for comparing one violent radical to another? There are several videos on Youtube where you can see BLM calling for the deaths of members of law enforcement. You are practicaally cheering this sort of behavior on. Perhaps you are the spineless coward for not admitting that?
Nevertheless, racist radicals in the Neo Nazi movement or BLM movement should be shunned by society as non productive and weird, to say the least.
I agree. The Union should have executed the entire Confederate officer corps along with every last Confederate legislator.
We aren't talking about a statue of Jefferson Davis here... But one of Robert Lee. There are miles of separation between those two figures and if you study Lee you might think differently as to why a statue of him should not be considered offensive.
***But I forget that we are dealing with the leftists who have zero tolerance for anything just one of them finds fault with.
Er, no.
There's a difference between occasional radicals and organized, large-scale radical movements. You don't see extreme elements of BLM holding massive protests demanding the deaths of police; you do see those protests from neo-Nazis.
And you see, BLM at large condemns extremists when they pop up within its ranks. I don't see you condemning these neo-Nazis at all; you're practically cheering them on. You're a spineless coward who sees overt racism and tries to excuse it rather than fight it like a decent human being.
Some people refuse to acknowledge the underlying cause during these protests and conflate. ExampleHere's the thing: I do condemn BLM extremists, as does the broader BLM movement. Shooting police is not the answer. But every neo-Nazi is a racist radical. Doesn't matter whether they couch their terms in euphemisms, like Richard Spencer, or participate in outright violence like we've seen this weekend; if you believe in white supremacy, you're a racist extremist.
So yes, you are a spineless coward. You equivocate a handful of extremists in a largely benign movement (BLM) with a group that is nothing but extremists. You're afraid of grappling with the severity of what we're seeing, because that would involve acknowledging that extremism among white Americans is far worse. All of these neo-Nazis genuinely want genocide and segregation, and you're acting as if they're just raising valid concerns in a rude way. They shout "white lives matter" not because white people are being persecuted (they aren't, sorry), but because they believe white lives are the only ones that matter.