I'm 19, I'm working on my BS in CS at THE University of Texas in Austin. I will begin working at a large Austin software company developing for the PalmOS. I have extensive training in C/C++, ASM for many architectures, and some functional programming (Haskell and Scheme). UT CS has a very theoretical curriculum, so I also spend a lot of my time (too much in my opinion) working on proofs on set theory, and doing discrete mathematics. So we're taught to reason about our programs effeciency, and to analyze and prove our algorithms work for all cases. However, I am told that once one is in the industry, all that matters is "that it works," and that you get the job done quickly. Does anyone in this forum have any response to this?
Later,
Andrew
Later,
Andrew