Who Else Thinks Linkin Park Makes some awesome hooks?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Kev

Lifer
Dec 17, 2001
16,367
4
81
wtf is wrong with you people. one retard says that linkin park doesn't write their own music and everyone believes him like a bunch of fscking sheep. idiots.

they write every bit of every song. from lyrics to music. this is not a matter of opinion, it is a fact.
 

HamSupLo

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2001
4,021
0
0
I guess it's a generational divide over whether Linkin Park sucks or not. I think most of the older music listeners like myself don't like the new breed of rock bands coming out. I feel that Linkin Park is neither thought provoking or musically challenging.
 

peto

Senior member
Jul 26, 2001
807
0
0
I'm not sure if they write their own music, but they were put together much like Nsync.
 

freak-o-a-l

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
587
0
0
First, I just have to say that I don't like linkin park, but I don't have anything against anyone does. Everybody has different tastes, and that is what makes like interesting. Anyway, getting to the point of this post, I don't beleive Linkin Park wrote most of their music. I know for a fact that they got a major label contract after playing their first show. Now most would say that they must have been incredibly talented to get signed after only one performace, but looking into it more I think you'll see my point. In my opinion, it seems like a record exec saw them and saw an oppurtunity to mold a band into what he/she wanted them to be. I mean they only played one show, so they weren't exactly an established band with a certain sound, image, mission, or agenda. The record company knew that they could probably make them do whatever they wanted because I don't think that anyone would turn down a major label contract that early in their career. And just like most of the MTV crowd, they were manufactured to make money. The record company wrote their songs and created their image just like they did for n'sync, backstreet boys, etc. Now don't get me wrong, all MTV stuff isn't bad, there are lots of bands who actually had to write their music, promote it, play an endless schedule of shows, and basically have to work for what they are today, DMB and Creed for example. While they might not be my taste, I'll give DMB a hell of alot of credit for being great musicians, touring endlessly, and not letting fame get to their head. Anyway, I'm going to end this because I think I really got off topic.
 
Jun 18, 2000
11,140
722
126


<< I'm not sure if they write their own music, but they were put together much like Nsync. >>


That's bullsh*t. The lead singer Chester was the only person that was "interviewed" to join the band. The rest of them were together making music for several years (1996, I think) before Hybrid Theory was released.
 

Kev

Lifer
Dec 17, 2001
16,367
4
81


<< First, I just have to say that I don't like linkin park, but I don't have anything against anyone does. Everybody has different tastes, and that is what makes like interesting. Anyway, getting to the point of this post, I don't beleive Linkin Park wrote most of their music. I know for a fact that they got a major label contract after playing their first show. Now most would say that they must have been incredibly talented to get signed after only one performace, but looking into it more I think you'll see my point. In my opinion, it seems like a record exec saw them and saw an oppurtunity to mold a band into what he/she wanted them to be. I mean they only played one show, so they weren't exactly an established band with a certain sound, image, mission, or agenda. The record company knew that they could probably make them do whatever they wanted because I don't think that anyone would turn down a major label contract that early in their career. And just like most of the MTV crowd, they were manufactured to make money. The record company wrote their songs and created their image just like they did for n'sync, backstreet boys, etc. Now don't get me wrong, all MTV stuff isn't bad, there are lots of bands who actually had to write their music, promote it, play an endless schedule of shows, and basically have to work for what they are today, DMB and Creed for example. While they might not be my taste, I'll give DMB a hell of alot of credit for being great musicians, touring endlessly, and not letting fame get to their head. Anyway, I'm going to end this because I think I really got off topic. >>



jesus some people are dense...

it's nice that you can support your opinions with a bunch of made up bullsh!t though
 

CraigRT

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
31,440
5
0
One Step Closer is the bomb.... some days at work i hear that and the day just goes so much better after that.. it's a great motivational song

seriously though. Linkin Park is some TIGHT music......
 

astroview

Golden Member
Dec 14, 1999
1,907
0
0
I'm with the older people in that the rock bands in the early 90s that I grew up on sound a lot better than Linkin Park. And its not that I'm stuck in a time warp and only listen to stuff before 1993, I like a lot of new pop punk too but most rap/metal mixes sound bad to me.

Linkin Park seems like they are trying a bit too hard to be badass...
 

PsychoAndy

Lifer
Dec 31, 2000
10,735
0
0


<< they're okay, I guess, but musically, they cannot compare to the likes of Zao or Extol. Listen to the song "To Think of You is Treasure an Absent Memory" by Zao and ask yourself if Linkin Park can make their guitars sound like that. >>



Zao vs. Linkin Park...hmm... a poppy rock band, versus a hardcore band. Music is one thing, being able to hear/understand the lyrics is another. It probably is possible with zao, but I can't, so i'll stick with Linkin Park.

As for the Linkin Park and tool debate, I like Aenima and Lateralus way better than Hybrid Theory, but Hybrid Theory has it's place. All depends on the mood.
 

PsychoAndy

Lifer
Dec 31, 2000
10,735
0
0


<< I guess it's a generational divide over whether Linkin Park sucks or not. I think most of the older music listeners like myself don't like the new breed of rock bands coming out. I feel that Linkin Park is neither thought provoking or musically challenging. >>



It's none of those. I just listen to it because it's good chillaxin music to me. Tool is definitely thought provoking and challenging...but sometimes i'm not in a mood. And thats whre LP comes in...
 

freak-o-a-l

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
587
0
0
Excuse me, I didn't say that I was right. I was just saying what I think they are and putting it out there for some people to consider. I can't prove that they were manufactured just like you can't prove they weren't. And yes they did get signed after their first show, the singer or the guitarist said it in an interview in some magazine. Also, if you want to carry on this discussion in a mature manner, I'll be more than glad to listen to what you have to say. And Hey I don't care if you like them, there's nothing wrong with that, I think that life would be prety boring if everyone liked the same damn thing. Just don't call me dense because I stated what I beleive. There's a very good chance that I am wrong and I realize that. Thanks
 

SiLEighTy

Banned
Aug 22, 2001
1,116
0
0
man, talk about going off topic. I just wanted to know who agreed with me that Linkin park's hooks are awesome.

Then it came a flame war about them not writing their own songs, then it came calling them molded like a boy band.

Interesting views though.
 

MisterPants

Senior member
Apr 28, 2001
335
0
0
I don't understand the popularity/acclaim of/for Tool and The Strokes. Both seem relatively generic. I don't think Linkin Park is very impressive either, but their songs are rather catchy (in an irritating way).
 

LikeLinus

Lifer
Jul 25, 2001
11,518
670
126
You compair Linkin Park to Zao or Extol???? Jesus. Thats like compairing them to Backstreet Boys. Totally different music. Zao in my opinion is suck. First off their music is just sh!tty. Secondly, you wanna talk about being manufactured??? Their first album as a band had a certainline. Then in 1998 for their second album (Where Blood and Fire Bring Rest) they had a WHOLE NEW LINE UP. Talk about being manufactured. They cant even keep a band together and they have to add new members to write an album. Then more members left before their last album. Yeah thats a stable band! One that every album i need to learn the name of the new members..LOL

But on a more serious note. I like to actually hear the words and listen to the music. Bands like Zao, Nile, Napalm Death, Nile, Earth Crisis....it's all just fast senseless music with screaming. Theres really NO point to it and no musical talent to boot. I've seen 12 year old kids in guitar stores playing as fast as they do. It takes TALENT to write melodic melodies and bring mood into music using different tempos and diverse elements. Sitting around screaming and play as fast as possible does not represent musical talent. (FYI i've been playing guitar for over 15 years now).


Linkin Park do write their own music. While i don't "love" their music, it's standable in these times of bubblegum pop and sh!tty wannabe grudge bands like Creed, Puddle of Mudd, Godsmack. Their guitarist is quite a good guitarist and writes the majority of their music within the band. Just because they got signed after one show represents nothing but talent and doesnt mean they are constructed. You are making huge consipiracy theories here. Don't try to take away the talent a band represents because you don't like their music.
 

Flat

Banned
Jan 18, 2001
929
0
0
I can assure you Linkin Park has good solid music. I was skeptical at first, but they really do have a nice sound and good musical depth. The lead singer has a very relaxed voice, quite operatic.

Not that they challenge god, Billy C.
 

zsouthboy

Platinum Member
Aug 14, 2001
2,264
0
0
But on a more serious note. I like to actually hear the words and listen to the music. Bands like Zao, Nile, Napalm Death, Nile, Earth Crisis....it's all just fast senseless music with screaming. Theres really NO point to it and no musical talent to boot. I've seen 12 year old kids in guitar stores playing as fast as they do. It takes TALENT to write melodic melodies and bring mood into music using different tempos and diverse elements. Sitting around screaming and play as fast as possible does not represent musical talent. (FYI i've been playing guitar for over 15 years now).

WTF?? Melodic melodies???? Yeah.... sure....

/me goes to write a bunch of sh!tty music using mainly HARMONICS since I obviously can't write anything else that sounds good. *rolleyes*

Boy is their music challanging to play...*yet another rolleyes*

zs

EDIT: BTW I don't hate them, it's just that their songs are overplayed....cough....Nickelback....cough....cough....

I liked One Step Closer when it first came out, I still like crawling.....but......after a while....it just gets old.....


 

skace

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
14,488
7
81
I like Linkin Park like I like early Metallica (And justice for all..., Master Of Puppets). While Metallica's early stuff deffinitely is more epic than Linkin Park they both do very well at conveying emotion without having to turn into screaming until their voice cracks (can't stand that type of music). I hope Linkin Park continues to write CDs that I can listen to every song on the CD without having to skip craptracks and that they continue to mature as a band.

The song I like most from Linkin Park is Papercut.
 

drewshin

Golden Member
Dec 14, 1999
1,464
0
0
craaawwwliingg iiiin my skeeeeeenn, theeeeeeezzzzz wooooooooonds they wiiiiiill nooooot heeeeeel

LOL, good music, but the lyrics make me cringe. it's too wannabe "im not wannabe"
 

Cessna172

Member
Jan 8, 2001
183
0
0
They're allright. The main singer is okay, but they need to get rid of that cheesy white-rapper guy.
 

Spooner

Lifer
Jan 16, 2000
12,025
1
76
um, excuse me, but LINKIN PARK is the friggin best!!!!!!!!!!!

can't wait for their new album
 

Modeps

Lifer
Oct 24, 2000
17,255
44
91
Linkin Park sucks. They took what Limp Bizkit brought to the mainstream (rap-rock) and made a whole bunch of songs that sound the same. Now they inundate the only semi-decent radiostation in Connecticut (dont know about anywhere else, so I wont speak for anywhere else). For the record, I would like to say, the orignal limp bizkit was good, back on '3 Dollar Bill'. After that, they are suck.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |