Who Was The Real Talent Behind The Beatles?

[MisterCornell]

John Lennon or Paul McCartney?

 

[Proletariat]

Originally posted by: MisterCornell
John Lennon or Paul McCartney?

Lennon. Hands down.

 

[anxi80]

lennon. but then tragedy struck. and then another tragedy struck when chapman shot him.

 

[oogabooga]

Originally posted by: anxi80
lennon. but then tragedy struck. and then another tragedy struck when chapman shot him.

ouch. bazing.

 

[WarriorWithin]

lennon

 

[Yzzim]

yoko

 

[SVT Cobra]

lennon

/thread

 

[blodhi74]

ringo

 

[Miramonti]

McCartney was brilliant also. Phenomonal duo.

 

[DaveSimmons]

The four working together.

I'll grant Lennon's post-Beatles work is more interesting than McCartney's, though McCartney has written several very nice songs since the split.

 

[WildHorse]

John Lennon

 

[xeno2060]

Musically it was Paul, though John was a great lyricist.

 

[keeleysam]

Everybody but Paul

 

[bobbybe01]

drugs?

 

[Platypus]

Lennon I would say, however I cannot leave out Harrison.

 

[hdeck]

definitely the drugs

 

George > John > Paul > Ringo

 

[Schadenfroh]

John AND Paul as a team.

 

[Mean MrMustard]

Originally posted by: Son of a N00b
lennon

/thread

Lennon - writing music

Harrison - playing guitar

...depends which you like more the lyrics or the music

/thread

 

[Amused]

All of them contributed significantly to the music, lyrics and style of the band.

I find it sad how many in this thread discount Harrison and Star's talent and contributions.

 

[imported_malcontent]

Timing and the Media!

 

[Sheepathon]

Roger Waters

 

[arcenite]

Volkswagen

 

[Colt45]

john, paul, drugs and volkswagen

 

[ktehmok]

John & Paul (in that fvcking order), and George Martin for keeping their collective sh|t together.

And may Yoko's crotch spontaneously combust into a flaming fireball of crabs and Bouncing-Betty Bombs on top of Linda McCartney's grave.

Ahem, GF's/wives & good music do not ever mix...