LongTimePCUser
Senior member
- Jul 1, 2000
- 472
- 0
- 76
The fact that Democrats believed the Bush lies based on falsified CIA reports does not bean that the lies were true.
In fact, your statement shows how the Bush people suceeded in seizing power to pursue their policies based on lies.
The only current evidence at the time was from the U.N. inspectors who were not finding any WMD in Iraq.
In fact, your statement shows how the Bush people suceeded in seizing power to pursue their policies based on lies.
The only current evidence at the time was from the U.N. inspectors who were not finding any WMD in Iraq.
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
I remember those WMDs. The Democrats, and even Hillary herself, swore they were real long before Bush even came into office. Incredible plan.Originally posted by: LongTimePCUser
Remember the "weapons of mass destruction" that were created out of thin air that allowed Bush to seize control of the government for several years and to invade Irag even though all the evidence from the U.N. weapons inspectors said that there was no evidence for their existence?
It may not even take a real 9-11 event to generate the invocation of NSPD-51.
Congress and the Supreme Court need to be very vigilant over the next year to preserve what is left of constitutional elections in 2008.
This is a president who created the concept of "signing statements" so that he could refuse to execute laws passed by Congress without having to veto them. Congress simply can't over ride a signing statement.
If I were to guess what sort of events would lead to the invocation of NSPD-51 next year I would guess that it might be related to the invasion of Iran.
I hope that this will not happen.