I scanned through the first few pages of thread posts and found nothing about the Senator from Arizona -- a swing state.
Meanwhile, I just about broke my TV again today for becoming angry at "undecided" and "Trump supporter" focus groups. Asked about what they thought of Kamala Harris, one of them said:
"We've only had about three years with her as Vice-President, and she's hardly done anything. We think she's part of the cover-up of Biden's health decline situation . . . "
THIS -- after a week or so broadcasting Biden's meet-ups with NATO leaders. One senior moment in the debate, and he's suddenly been a doddering Alzheimer's patient all this time. I wanted to throw my coffee cup at the TV, and wore myself out screaming at those cornpone, ignorant swing-state voters.
So barring all that, I assume people are rational enough to show an affinity to a candidate based on superficial or "symbolic" indicators of competence and accomplishment. I would therefore say that Mark Kelly would be a very judicious choice for Harris' VP:
* He was a navy pilot
* He was an astronaut
* He's a US Senator from a state with a strong conservative taint
* His wife is Gabbie Giffords,, who'd been shot in the head by a lone-nut in 2010, making her and her husband Mark strong advocates of gun regulation, while Mark is a gun owner and advocate without extreme views. This has the potential to neutralize any of Trump's self-pitying attitude about his "victim-hood" for getting his ear clipped by a shooter in Butler, PA.
You'd think he would have some appeal even among the clueless Neanderthals who are either "Undecided" or staunch Trump supporters and conspiracy delusionals.
Finally, Kelly represents a balanced ticket. He's a "white guy". So the ticket wouldn't be an "in-your-face" combination of two women or a minority and a gay person -- as some have observed of other choices. The only question might be "chemistry" -- can Kelly play the role of VP in the most respectful and careful way as Harris has done serving Biden?