purbeast0
No Lifer
- Sep 13, 2001
- 53,024
- 5,905
- 126
The Vikings thought they were a QB away from the Super Bowl and paid a stupid contract to bring in a QB that will never take them there. Now they are strapped for cash and won't be able to get a supporting cast to help out. If they do not win a Super Bowl next year, then the Cousins experiment will officially be a complete bust and will have set the team back significantly from before they ever got Cousins.
Would the Redskins be better with Cousins? Probably record wise, because 3 wins is utter shit. Financially they would be completely screwed though. Cousins is NOT worth the money that the Vikings paid him. Had the Redskins got him for like $20 million or something per year, then I would have been just fine with it. I'm glad they didn't pay him that money.
And Cousins being top 6 QB in the league? Yeah I disagree. I'd put him like in the pack between 10-15. He simply folds under the spotlight. Sure he finally got a "big win" this year, but that is the outlier. I mean facts are facts and his record is what it is.
Would the Redskins be better with Cousins? Probably record wise, because 3 wins is utter shit. Financially they would be completely screwed though. Cousins is NOT worth the money that the Vikings paid him. Had the Redskins got him for like $20 million or something per year, then I would have been just fine with it. I'm glad they didn't pay him that money.
And Cousins being top 6 QB in the league? Yeah I disagree. I'd put him like in the pack between 10-15. He simply folds under the spotlight. Sure he finally got a "big win" this year, but that is the outlier. I mean facts are facts and his record is what it is.