*sigh*
Spidey, you're such a fucking tool.
Notice how your post has absolutely no content at all... it's because you're a fucking idiot and you have nothing to contribute to this forum at all.
I'm not sure why I waste my time posting since you seem to genuinely lack the ability to comprehend even the most simplest of terms laid out for you.
It's only because of Obama that everything is so fucked right now. Removing him is the first step to get the country back on track. We've seen this before with Carter, it's the exact same, following the same path and misery was at an all time high. Just like now.
The solution is simple. Get rid of fuckstain in office and we'll get back on track immediately. You saw what this president really is last night, that's how the rest of the world leaders view him as well.
A whooped, meak, mangy dog.
You misunderstand me. I meant "any less bias than they already are." Woolfe implied that the left side of the media is somehow unbiased based on the fact that they admitted Romney won.
I have no issue saying that Fox News is more bias than almost any single one of their peers, but given the collective bias of all other mainstream networks, they have to compensate somehow.
Never said they were any better. Comparing two types of apples doesn't make one an orange.
"It's only because of Obama that everything is so fucked right now."
That has got to be one of the stupiest things anyone has said on the forums. We have systemic problems that span decades, I agree Obama has done nothing to really solve any of these issues but to insinuate everything is bad because of obama is epic dumb.
You're insane. Everything he has done has harmed our country. We were going strong in the 2000s and now look at the mess Obama has us in.
Savings down
net worth down
income down
cost of energy skyrocketing
cost of everything skyrocketing
All in just 3.5 short years. We simply cannot take 4 more years of his destruction, can't do it.
You're insane. Everything he has done has harmed our country. We were going strong in the 2000s and now look at the mess Obama has us in.
Savings down
net worth down
income down
cost of energy skyrocketing
cost of everything skyrocketing
All in just 3.5 short years. We simply cannot take 4 more years of his destruction, can't do it.
You're insane. Everything he has done has harmed our country. We were going strong in the 2000s and now look at the mess Obama has us in.
Savings down
net worth down
income down
cost of energy skyrocketing
cost of everything skyrocketing
All in just 3.5 short years.
What?
2008: Obama wins debates, Fox claims McCain won.
2012: Romney wins debate, CNN, MSNBC etc. claim Romney won.
That suggests they are worse. Which is what I think the whole point is.
And this is not a 1+1=2 scenario. Those networks could have easily pulled Romney's statments apart, criticized them, and called Obama the winner.
I'm really not sure what that even means. :hmm:You misunderstand me. I meant "any less bias than they already are."
No, I'm quite certain that Woolfe meant that the "liberal media" is less biased overall than Fox News.Woolfe implied that the left side of the media is somehow unbiased based on the fact that they admitted Romney won.
I hope that wink implies you are joking with this statement.I have no issue saying that Fox News is more bias than almost any single one of their peers, but given the collective bias of all other mainstream networks, they have to compensate somehow.
Well, from that super-surprise 2007 video, I know Obama kept his promise about reforming healthcare...
How intellectually stimulating.Some of you have your mouths full... of either Obama's cock (dank69, for example) or Romney's cock (spidey07, for example).
I'm gay and I want nothing to do with either of their cocks.
I'm gay and I want nothing to do with either of their cocks.
Sounds like a great endorsement for a 3rd party
I think Hillary would have smacked Romney silly with a trout. She has bigger balls that Obama.
You misunderstand me. I meant "any less bias than they already are." Woolfe implied that the left side of the media is somehow unbiased based on the fact that they admitted Romney won.
I have no issue saying that Fox News is more bias than almost any single one of their peers, but given the collective bias of all other mainstream networks, they have to compensate somehow.
What are you talking about? The '08 elections didn't need that (Hope n Change!), neither does this one - or the ones we'll have in the future.
How long would it take for Romney to detail one loophole he would close?Romney pummeled Obama.
This is the man leading our country folks. Barrack Obama who can't even articulate well. Who doesn't have the facts. Who lost a debate to a lousy car salesman. Romney made such glaring falsities? Then why didn't Obama call him out.
Face it guys. You can't fix the economy. And Obama can't and couldn't fix the economy. It isn't a simple issue. Chances are that the solution is something that AVERAGE and above average people won't understand. Heck, it might take a PHD to understand it. Romney understands it. Does it matter if you don't understand how Romney is going to fix the economy?
The fact is, he knows his shit. He knows the economy far better than any of us. If any of us knew the economy as well as he did, then we would be worth 200million as well. And Obama doesn't understand the economy either. If Romney were to articulate in full detail every loophole he would close, spending he would cut, etc., and how it would fix the economy, it would take a 200-slide powerpoint presentation.
The answer isn't a simple one line: raise taxes on rich. It just isn't.