I like Fox News. Because everything they say is a specifically constructed lie, once you reverse the spin they're actually a good source of information.
It's a shame conservatards lack the intelligence to be able to replicate this feat.
Holy moley - how do people watch either of these channels? Their biases are insane.
MO matter what you say . This was in that transcript
Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts
Obummer got lucky and used the terror word Big deal in the context of where we stand on terrorism . The above was also in their . This was about degrading their religious prophet .
Does it really matter what the WH said at the time of the attack on the American embassy in Libya??? Who cares whether it was a terrorist attack... or a mob attack.. Americans died and the instigators must be brought to justice.
I am sure during the chaos of that night, and the fact that the youtube video was widely seen that same day, people would assume the attack was due to the video, not an attack by militants (or perhaps the militants attacked during a protest)
In the end, it doesn't matter what the root cause of the attack was - we have better things to worry about than the semantic of the origination of the attack.
The truth often does that to people that are in denial.
I like Fox News. Because everything they say is a specifically constructed lie, once you reverse the spin they're actually a good source of information.
It's a shame conservatards lack the intelligence to be able to replicate this feat.
You've convinced me that you are lacking the basic English skills to participate in this argument, let alone understand the words you're reading.
My opinion of people who thought romney won here is about the same as those who thought obama won the first debate........perhaps you are taking too many meds?
You've convinced me that you are lacking the basic English skills to participate in this argument, let alone understand the words you're reading.
WHAT?????? The commander in chief shouldn't know what happened????? What an asinine thing to say. The fact of the matter is that it TOOK TOO LONG for the real story to come out. And I want to see some damn accountability...whoever denied security in Libya should be sacked. European embassies/consulates have marines...but LIBYA DOESN'T??? And diplomats feared for their security, asked for help, and it was denied. Who denied it???? Add 1 (or more) to the unemployment line.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...9a411c-1258-11e2-ba83-a7a396e6b2a7_story.htmlHouse Republicans cut the administration’s request for embassy security funding by $128 million in fiscal 2011 and $331 million in fiscal 2012....Last year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Republicans’ proposed cuts to her department would be “detrimental to America’s national security” — a charge Republicans rejected.
Ryan, Issa and other House Republicans voted for an amendment in 2009 to cut $1.2 billion from State operations, including funds for 300 more diplomatic security positions. Under Ryan’s budget, non-defense discretionary spending, which includes State Department funding, would be slashed nearly 20 percent in 2014, which would translate to more than $400 million in additional cuts to embassy security.
......aaand, as usual, it breaks down into this: the exact reason I seldom post in P&N.Break down the article into sections lets really look at who is full of shit here . You all profess to being english majors . lets break down the article into context . Lets see what shit for brains really said.
Break down the article into sections lets really look at who is full of shit here . You all profess to being english majors . lets break down the article into context . Lets see what shit for brains really said.
I just love it when people are in denial...hahahaaaRomney. Not because of what he said but simply because Obama didn't deliver. They both seems OK with flinging horseshit back and forth while everything smells like BS.
I blame a lot of the BS on the format and the moderator.
Romney just wins by default because this debate didn't change anything. Basically, tie goes to the challenger. Perhaps the next one will actually change something.
The truth that you are a shit and run cry baby? Yeah, you were pegged as one years ago and the fact that you haven't caught on by now let's us know that it's not just another river in Africa. You are clearly in denial... Your Obama kicked Romney's ass tonight. Everyone knows this.
ecoKOOK the fuck back under whatever bridge you call home...
Romney won. He may not have buried Obama as he did in the first debate but his points were damning. That he hammered on the economy made him more on point with what matters.
Crowley should have STFU with her interruptions and let Romney respond to the unfounded statements being made by Obama. She gave Obama 9% more time to speak, even more than the other Obama apologist moderators. At least she said after the debate that she was wrong about what Obama said about Benghazi - she will be remembered for her partisan error.
Obama was definitely more engaged than before, but he came across as less than presidential.
I score it 6-4 in favor of Romney. Look for his small but significant lead to continue until the next debate.
My opinion of people who thought romney won here is about the same as those who thought obama won the first debate........perhaps you are taking too many meds?