Originally posted by: RussianSensation
Originally posted by: Gamer X
1.They are red
2.The are less technologicaly advanced and they try to make up for that by employing higher core speeds,but in the end they are less effecient than nvidia cards,Soviet weapons were less technologicaly advanced,bigger,and less effecient than American weapons.
note:If ATI goes out of business that would be a third reason.
OK your statements are too funny.... You provided no timeline whatsoever.
I would be careful dissing Russia given that they invented the lazer, have far outpaced Americans when it comes to aircraft technology and actually hold the record for having build the largest airplane to date, and their space expertise is unparalleled. Let's not even discuss AK-47's standing as still the best all-around weapon ever made and how M16 guns jam in water....I also failed to mention that out of all the country's in the world, Russia leads in terms of having the most billionaires under the age of 40 in the top 100.
Instead you should thank the Soviet Union for showing you that alternative market systems like communism are inferior to capitalism and that no market system is perfect. Plus, without Russia and their "inferior" and "inefficient" weapons, Americans would have never defeated Hitler and many historians argue that they actually won the war and Americans helped them.
Again just because Russia is inferior economically today, doesn't mean US will remain the top empire forever...Just like Nvidia's market lead is probably going to be overcome at one point (yet again ATI leads in overall market share).
Also when you say ATI cards are less technologically advanced, what do you mean exactly? Avivo video engine and ATI's 2D output are far superior to Nvidia. Nvidia still offers no multimedia solution compared to Ati's all-in-wonder. ATI cards offer SM3.0, but let you have 14AA in crossfire mode and have 3Dc support. You can also say that that Nvidia has CineFX engine and shadow technology.
Both companies offer something the other firm doesnt. Just because one goes about a different way of achieving the end result of producing image and framerates, doesn't mean the other is less technologically advanced. They are just different....Plus efficiency can be measured in terms of output per clock cycle, performance per watt, etc. So your argument is very ambiguous.