Why Biden is pulling the US -- and NATO -- out of Afghanistan

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

uallas5

Golden Member
Jun 3, 2005
1,469
1,632
136
So, how will things go after the withdrawal? Taliban take over? Heroin the main export and huge? Repression, women under men's thumbs completely? Hotbed of terrorism? I mean that's the worst case scenario, right? Is that where it's heading?
Interesting how the heroine trade will be affected. Before the war, the Taliban cracked down on poppy growth and heroine manufacture but then it became a lucrative source of income to fund fighting against NATO forces so they ended up in the drug industry. I wonder if they'll kick that habit but I'm guessing not.
 

Ajay

Lifer
Jan 8, 2001
16,094
8,109
136
So, how will things go after the withdrawal? Taliban take over? Heroin the main export and huge? Repression, women under men's thumbs completely? Hotbed of terrorism? I mean that's the worst case scenario, right? Is that where it's heading?
Not the *worst* scenario; it is the expected scenario. We still have drones, and, SpecOps teams for critical terrorist targets.
 

rommelrommel

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2002
4,408
3,177
146
So, how will things go after the withdrawal? Taliban take over? Heroin the main export and huge? Repression, women under men's thumbs completely? Hotbed of terrorism? I mean that's the worst case scenario, right? Is that where it's heading?

Everything but the hotbed of terrorism I think. I suspect they’ll try to keep it down a bit as they can’t have enjoyed 20 years lost.
 

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
11,743
2,706
136
Still, at least some people made a lot of money out of it. Not really sure who - as I understand it an awful lot of funds intended for nation-building just disappeared.
Dick Cheney and his defense contractor buddies. It was a very inefficient way of lighting taxpayer money on fire though. I said over a decade ago we would have been better served just directly paying the billions to Cheney's buddies instead of indirectly via extended warfare.

2,300 American troops dead. 65,000 Afghan troops dead. At least 47,000 Afghan civilians dead. Trillions spent. Ludacris amounts of CO2 pumped.

Wtf.
Hate to even mention it, but the Iraq War numbers must be even worse.
 

Ajay

Lifer
Jan 8, 2001
16,094
8,109
136
Dick Cheney and his defense contractor buddies. It was a very inefficient way of lighting taxpayer money on fire though. I said over a decade ago we would have been better served just directly paying the billions to Cheney's buddies instead of indirectly via extended warfare.


Hate to even mention it, but the Iraq War numbers must be even worse.
The war with Iraq was much more lucrative than the one in Afghanistan. But, yeah, something like $4-6Trillion dollars spent on these two wars for, again, nothing. The Taliban taking over Afghanistan and Iraq is cozening up to Iran. A foreign policy master class in how to do EVERYTHING wrong .

So, just giving the US defense contractors $1T and calling it a day would have been waaayyy better.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
24,137
10,822
136
The war with Iraq was much more lucrative than the one in Afghanistan. But, yeah, something like $4-6Trillion dollars spent on these two wars for, again, nothing. The Taliban taking over Afghanistan and Iraq is cozening up to Iran. A foreign policy master class in how to do EVERYTHING wrong .

So, just giving the US defense contractors $1T and calling it a day would have been waaayyy better.
I seem to remember also about pallets of US money.
 
Reactions: DarthKyrie

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
11,743
2,706
136
The war with Iraq was much more lucrative than the one in Afghanistan. But, yeah, something like $4-6Trillion dollars spent on these two wars for, again, nothing. The Taliban taking over Afghanistan and Iraq is cozening up to Iran. A foreign policy master class in how to do EVERYTHING wrong .

So, just giving the US defense contractors $1T and calling it a day would have been waaayyy better.
Most Americans supported the war in Afghanistan then, and I'd still support the initial invasion today. The Taliban was harboring and supporting terrorism against the U.S. and at the least, we needed to go in and degrade AQ's capabilities to strike again. Obviously hindsight being 20/20, we know that nation-building in AF isn't really a thing since Alexander the Great did it. We also know the bogus Iraq War diverted resources away from the theatre we needed to be in to one we should never have entered. Who really knows if we had conducted a better strategy for Afghanistan from day 1 if we would have been out a lot sooner with a better overall outcome. I can only hope that when history books are written, Donald Rumsfeld's name (and those within his Iraq War cabal) goes down in infamy.
 

rommelrommel

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2002
4,408
3,177
146
Kicking their ass was a valid plan. Staying wasn’t.

4 trillion would have paid for basically all the neglect to US military equipment and a lot of domestic infrastructure to boot.
 
Reactions: DarthKyrie

Sunburn74

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2009
5,037
2,615
136
Sounds like the last of days. Afghan soldiers being executed after surrendering. Women being rounded up and basically sold into forced marriages. US pleading with the taliban to spare the US embassy days before the city holding it is supposed to fall.

All i can hope is that we honor our promises and offer a ticket out of there to anyone we promised to get out, though fat load of good that will do them when their families are killed and their sisters sold as sex slaves to horrible men.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Sounds like the last of days. Afghan soldiers being executed after surrendering. Women being rounded up and basically sold into forced marriages. US pleading with the taliban to spare the US embassy days before the city holding it is supposed to fall.

All i can hope is that we honor our promises and offer a ticket out of there to anyone we promised to get out, though fat load of good that will do them when their families are killed and their sisters sold as sex slaves to horrible men.

Please. If Afghan govt soldiers believed they'd be executed after surrender then they'd put up a better fight. They might be wrong but the evidence of that is extremely sketchy at best.
 
Reactions: Zorba

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
33,893
7,913
136
We needed to leave Afghanistan the moment we decided that we were not willing to kill every last Taliban.

It does not matter the numbers of enemy KIA that would require, if you are set upon victory then an opponent must be defeated. Otherwise you should yield the field to those who are willing and able to die and to kill for their cause. For they won the moment you decided to lose. And delay would change nothing. Afghanistan belongs to the Taliban, it always has, and it always will. For none among us desire it to be any different. Not truly.
 

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,181
10,732
136
It seems like this proves the population was never behind the new government, and that wouldn't have changed no matter how long we stayed.

Obviously the US sucks at nation building, and we should learn to stop trying.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
33,893
7,913
136
Obviously the US sucks at nation building, and we should learn to stop trying.

Hot topic. Iran is the reason ISIS was stopped from taking over Iraq.

Certainly not the Iraqi military we formed, who under-manned Mosul and abandoned it at the approach of the first pickup truck.

Between Afghanistan and Iraq. It must be argued that the United States does not understand armed conflict. For the forces we build are horrifically crushed. There must be an underlying reason for that failure. Could it be we handicap them from the onset? We pretend they have our strength to uphold our values, as opposed to allowing them the freedom to handle their situation in a manner befitting their limited resources?

We build foreign armies that fail.
 
Reactions: DarthKyrie

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
23,931
13,426
136
We needed to leave Afghanistan the moment we decided that we were not willing to kill every last Taliban.

Yep.
Taliban obviously has funding and I cant imagine that intelligence is unaware of the cash and materiel flow, but for reasons, jfc, wont go after the source and glass it over.

One little nuke in some fucked up mountains woulda sent a strong signal too.

If you are going to do something do it proper well and maximum effort, or dont do it at all.

Yes I know im gonna catch flak for the nuke bit but then US, allies, should never have been there to begin with.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,151
16,553
136
Hot topic. Iran is the reason ISIS was stopped from taking over Iraq.

Certainly not the Iraqi military we formed, who under-manned Mosul and abandoned it at the approach of the first pickup truck.

Between Afghanistan and Iraq. It must be argued that the United States does not understand armed conflict. For the forces we build are horrifically crushed. There must be an underlying reason for that failure. Could it be we handicap them from the onset? We pretend they have our strength to uphold our values, as opposed to allowing them the freedom to handle their situation in a manner befitting their limited resources?

We build foreign armies that fail.

I agree and seems the same thing is happening here. Didnt see but I heard about an Afghan post being abandoned because there was one taliban dude shooting at it. They literally hoped in a car and drove away. Couple dudes left flagged down another car and left.
I don't want to be an arm chair general, above simply sounds wrong. There is an obvious lack of expectations, lack of commitment running up and down the chain, lack of will to fight for something that matters because well nothing matters it is all the same no matter who is the grand pooh-bah.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
23,931
13,426
136
Yes, it would have sent the signal that anyone that has a little nuke is free to use it against whatever enemy does not.

Yea, that's why they've been like bird droppings since fat man and little boy.
You know why they have not? Cause the US dropped them. Biggest military complex blablabla.
Gonna swing the dick swing the fucking dick.
 

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,181
10,732
136
Hot topic. Iran is the reason ISIS was stopped from taking over Iraq.

Certainly not the Iraqi military we formed, who under-manned Mosul and abandoned it at the approach of the first pickup truck.

Between Afghanistan and Iraq. It must be argued that the United States does not understand armed conflict. For the forces we build are horrifically crushed. There must be an underlying reason for that failure. Could it be we handicap them from the onset? We pretend they have our strength to uphold our values, as opposed to allowing them the freedom to handle their situation in a manner befitting their limited resources?

We build foreign armies that fail.
We create armies based on our culture, education, and money. That doesn't work well for countries that have none of that.
 

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,181
10,732
136
Yea, that's why they've been like bird droppings since fat man and little boy.
You know why they have not? Cause the US dropped them. Biggest military complex blablabla.
Gonna swing the dick swing the fucking dick.
Nukes save lives because of the MAD assumption, if you open the Pandora's box on their casual use it's going to be extremely hard to reclose.

I also seriously doubt nuking a random mountain side would've done anything to change the situation.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
27,491
26,509
136
Yep.
Taliban obviously has funding and I cant imagine that intelligence is unaware of the cash and materiel flow, but for reasons, jfc, wont go after the source and glass it over.

One little nuke in some fucked up mountains woulda sent a strong signal too.

If you are going to do something do it proper well and maximum effort, or dont do it at all.

Yes I know im gonna catch flak for the nuke bit but then US, allies, should never have been there to begin with.
The taliban is funded by the ISI .
 
Reactions: DarthKyrie
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |