Doom Machine
Senior member
- Oct 23, 2005
- 346
- 0
- 0
the hatred towards it comes from several different areas. and i beg anyone to disagree with me
1. its not the perfect OS that many enthusiasts has been hoping for.
80% of computer users only care about typical things like photo/video editiing,gaming...etc, its the enthusiasts who tend to care too much as many expected too much. its like a star trek nerd convention...they get together and argue about geek stuff that majority of people would say.."who cares?" or perhaps laugh at the thought.....i know i laugh at trek/star wars nerds as likely as my neghbor *steve* would laugh at this conversations of text.
2. its not revelutionary or very different in many ways compared to previous versions or other OS's.
especially seeing how so many linux distro's look just like windows and OSX ...similar enough, in other words theres nothing thats truely different about how the user interacts and i think many enthusiasts want to interact with things differently ....somehow in thier fantasy land i guess.
3. many enthusiasts want to see MS fail. they dont like the idea of "big daddy" some think they have no control despite the fact that they have every control except viewing/changing code and being under a license...its like a new techno hippy ideaology. you just have to learn how to make it do what you want despite its not always obvious or easy. many of these new "techno hipies" have fallen in love with the idea's that linux distro's follow and they tend to want to force windows/OSX users to think like them as apparant from so many threads, total freedom is nice but not for everyone and it has its many downfalls as well...just as many faults as any OS, same B.S. just a different texture is all.
4. many users have experienced alot of problems using vista. despite most of them not being vista's fault...if any.
some like to ignore/forgets that even hardware quality/brands...etc play a huge role in how stable and well an OS like vista wants despite its "recommended hardware specs"
like any OS vista isnt perfectly coded nor could anything be imo. one persons problem isnt founded by everyone so obviously something else is cause in relation.
5. now add in the fact that its taken what now? 6 years for MS to release it...and the companies who make drivers cant grasp a perfect driver yet?...the he** you say! ...this "its not fair" attititude along with retards trying to run it on cheap brand hardware parts like PNY ram and stuff and they expect miracles...its just not fair is it?
just learn from history, a couple years down the road, when drivers stabilize and then turn to better performance..as the cycle goes each time, MS works out some kinks with certain hardware type issue's..etc this all will be long forgotten untill the next OS arrives, meanwhile i'm going to play some oblivion, afterwhich i have a LIFE to attend to, not much of one but its better than caring about the drivel of OS nerds arguing over which is best.
1. its not the perfect OS that many enthusiasts has been hoping for.
80% of computer users only care about typical things like photo/video editiing,gaming...etc, its the enthusiasts who tend to care too much as many expected too much. its like a star trek nerd convention...they get together and argue about geek stuff that majority of people would say.."who cares?" or perhaps laugh at the thought.....i know i laugh at trek/star wars nerds as likely as my neghbor *steve* would laugh at this conversations of text.
2. its not revelutionary or very different in many ways compared to previous versions or other OS's.
especially seeing how so many linux distro's look just like windows and OSX ...similar enough, in other words theres nothing thats truely different about how the user interacts and i think many enthusiasts want to interact with things differently ....somehow in thier fantasy land i guess.
3. many enthusiasts want to see MS fail. they dont like the idea of "big daddy" some think they have no control despite the fact that they have every control except viewing/changing code and being under a license...its like a new techno hippy ideaology. you just have to learn how to make it do what you want despite its not always obvious or easy. many of these new "techno hipies" have fallen in love with the idea's that linux distro's follow and they tend to want to force windows/OSX users to think like them as apparant from so many threads, total freedom is nice but not for everyone and it has its many downfalls as well...just as many faults as any OS, same B.S. just a different texture is all.
4. many users have experienced alot of problems using vista. despite most of them not being vista's fault...if any.
some like to ignore/forgets that even hardware quality/brands...etc play a huge role in how stable and well an OS like vista wants despite its "recommended hardware specs"
like any OS vista isnt perfectly coded nor could anything be imo. one persons problem isnt founded by everyone so obviously something else is cause in relation.
5. now add in the fact that its taken what now? 6 years for MS to release it...and the companies who make drivers cant grasp a perfect driver yet?...the he** you say! ...this "its not fair" attititude along with retards trying to run it on cheap brand hardware parts like PNY ram and stuff and they expect miracles...its just not fair is it?
just learn from history, a couple years down the road, when drivers stabilize and then turn to better performance..as the cycle goes each time, MS works out some kinks with certain hardware type issue's..etc this all will be long forgotten untill the next OS arrives, meanwhile i'm going to play some oblivion, afterwhich i have a LIFE to attend to, not much of one but its better than caring about the drivel of OS nerds arguing over which is best.