OK, BooneRebel, you arguments have all been clearly and adequately and thoroughly addressed by Feathers flavio and skace and earlier by me, but I know you can't see that because of your blindness. Your position looks right because it feels right. The point you can't see is that your feelings are irrational. Those of us who aren't irrational in the same way can see who you are quite clearly. Those who are similarly irrational to you cannot. I haven't tried to specifically address every aspect of your irrationality because I have focused on the overall characteristics of your illness, the inculcation, prior to the age of reason, where you can apply intelligence and analysis before buying into an opinion or belief, of an irrational attitude bias and fear. Generally you get that from your parents, teachers, and the general culture. Call it brainwashing, if you will, but it is very difficult to see because you are surrounded by it and the sickness is the norm. That is why healthy people look sick in that surrounding.
The whole belief structure of illness is sustained by sometimes elaborate rationalizations. I used the example of white supremacy as an example because it's possible to see a different example of bigotry if it's one you don't have personally. Bigotry is the mote in your eye that classy has but quotes scripture about anyway not seeing his, but seeing the similarities, having them pointed out clearly, makes it easier to see if there is any willingness at all. Naturally, usually there is not. That may require more time and other impacts. Some people just don't want to be bigots even though they are and determine to change. Since bigotry causes such immense harm in the world, that's a good idea. I'm not a bigot against heterosexuals or bigots even. I just see what it does, how it works and some of who has it. I'm a bigot, I guess, for a better world where we do something about our blindness so we don't pass it on wholesale to our kids.
You have, as I said, been answered by others here, but because you can't see your own eye I'll reflect some of your points back again just for good measure in case it helps:
--------------------
BooneRebel:
I'm not assuming that Moonie is gay. I simply said he seems to be a bigot against heterosexuals. He may be a heterosexual and hate himself. But he continues to blather on about our 'irrational' position without providing any real argument as to why we should be considered irrational. Furthermore, I have presented several rational, logical explanations as to why I feel the way I do against gays. The only response has been namecalling and pitiful attempts to legitimize the homosexual 'lifestyle' by trying to compare it to being black, blue-eyed, etc. I drew a picture of the process of bigotry and left it for you to work out your own specifics)
The fact is, homsexuality is detrimental to society, much as smoking is. In the long run you are putting your own lifespan at risk, in addition to increasing the risk of those around you. Just like any other detrimental trait, it will result in you being 'culled from the herd', leaving the strongest to survive.
(This is what we can call putting your bigotry before the horse. You believe or started from the premise that homosexuality is detrimental and then proceed to rehearse a series of examples you can see to prove that. I'm tempted to start a big classy style rebuttal of your comparison of smokers to gays, sacred gay struggle vs. fools who smoke. Oh man. Anyway, as flavio said there are huge risks to any kind of sex and many other behaviors we try therefore, by law, to confine to consenting adults. Gay and straight sex are both as dangerous or as safe as the participants wish it to be. This is not a function of orientation, but education, income, mental health, etc.
As to your last point that homosexuality will be culled leaving the strongest, lets look at that. In the first place this is a confession that you thing homosexuality is genetic. If homosexuality is an environmental factor, hormone levels in the mother produced by stress, etc. then homosexuality will not be bread out of the population.
Secondly, if it really is genetic then what kind of a bigot is it that passes moral judgment on them? Do you feel that way about people with other genetic expression. Shall we rant on about people with sickle cell anemia?
Thirdly, the notion that homosexuality, obvious in our closest relatives, the Bonobo, indicates that homosexuality has been around for a long long time. If it is genetic, it must confer some survival adaptation to humanity that perhaps has passed notice. One thing about gayness that has fascinated me is the seemingly high proportion of them who exhibit extraordinary talent, as if what ever it is about being gay, maybe just the prejudice itself, causes gays to excel in many professions. Since we are and have been a social animal for millions of years perhaps the genetic material for homosexuality is transmitted by the brothers and sisters of gays who survive better in a competitive world due to the exceptional and unburdened (by children) skills of these brothers and sisters. A swish sitting around the campfire with his sisters decorating baskets is going to be a lot harder to take down in a raid or something than his sisters alone, especially if he's Neanderswish.